It's all in the news about how much the Clintons are spending on Chelsea's wedding. The "experts" say the cost is between $2 and $5 million. As a reference, the Bushes spent $100,000 on Jenna's wedding, and the average cost of a wedding in the US is $24,000.
What do you think?
A. It's a flagrant waste of money in the midst of all the economic suffering in America right now.
B. The Clintons earned that money, and Chelsea is their only child. They should feel free to give her the wedding of her dreams.
B - Let them do whatever they want to do
Habee - my thoughts.
It does seem like a lot of money to spend but it's their money, their child, their event so they can spend it how they like.
Personally, I doubt I would spend that amount of money on a day, but I don't have it so its a non issue for me!
I really have mixed feelings about this and can see both sides. Part of me thinks that they could have had a fabulous wedding for just $1 million and could have donated the rest to charity. That would have fed a lot of hungry folks!
That's very true but they already give money to charity.
You could take that argument down to an individual level. What if I earned a modest amount, anyone could say that I could live more frugally and give the rest to feed others. I guess the point I'm trying to make is if one makes judgments about the rich then where does it stop?
I believe that it's a persons right to spend their own money how they choose.
Thanks for your big heart for donating Clinton's money to fed a lot of hungry folks!
As I said, I have mixed feelings. I could never spend that much money for a single event, even if I had it. I agree that the Clintons have donated a lot to charity. I'm not judging them for how they spend their money - they earned it. I'm just saying how I would feel.
Well B. is the right answer. Chelsea is their only child & they can spend that kind of money. Bill Clinton alone can make that money in a day or two.
What would be your options if you only have one child and you are in same position like Clinton's?
Aren't they paying the father in law's debts along with the wedding costs?
It's not about the money.... it's about finding someone who would be crazy enough to sign the Pre-Nup
B..it is for clinton's to spend their earned money in way they want to...
B. Although I do think it's indescribably tacky to spend that much on a wedding!
B. is my initial response. It is their money and should be able to spend it as they see fit.
I would like to say that I would not choose to spend it that way but since I have never had it to spend I do not know that I wouldn't.
B. They can spend their money however they wish.
That doesn't mean that I personally don't think that it's wasteful and tacky. However, my personal opinion doesn't and shouldn't matter to them.
by screaming 10 years ago
TO every Republican who are voting for Romney, not because you like him, but because you dislike President Obama! Listen to President Clintons speech! You might find yourself rethinking, and voting for President Obama in November! Many of you have written that you would vote for Democrat Hillary...
by Susie Lehto 6 years ago
My name is Danney Lee Williams, I'm the son of the 42nd President of the United States Bill Clinton. All I want to do is shake my father's hand. I have requested a DNA test.* https://www.facebook.com/Danney-William … 276415563/Danney says he was banished by Hillary Clinton. Black lives...
by ga anderson 5 years ago
This should be a hot one. The much anticipated Special Counsel's first indictments have been unsealed - and they aren't about Pres. Trump and Russian election collusion, (yet???)But like a lyric from a song; 'whoo eee, whoo eee babyyy...' It sure paints an ugly picture. And one that seems to be a...
by Stacie L 10 years ago
By Alexander Abad-Santos | The Atlantic Wire Bill Clinton May or May Not Have Called Obama an 'Amateur'... Edward Klein's story of how Bill Clinton called Obama an "amateur" and told his wife to quit the amazing job she was doing as Secretary of State if, you know, the Clintons weren't...
by Demas W Jasper 6 years ago
If "Stronger Together" is what the Clintons are promoting, why the Wikileaks that show they don't?
by Dr Billy Kidd 8 years ago
Now that the 2014 elections are over (hooray!), it's time to look ahead at the 2016 campaign. Senator Rand Paul started it off 5 months ago by declaring that the Clintons are immoral. Now the billionaire stealth money will turn against Hillary. Will it start at Thanksgiving, Christmas, or January...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|