ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

The Problem with Paranormal Evidence

Updated on March 10, 2014
Jeannieinabottle profile image

Jeannie is a huge fan of Halloween and loves everything that is ghoulish. You can often find her reading or writing horror stories.

Look at this ghost that lives in my house.  Oh wait, no, that is just me using some simple photo enhancement software.
Look at this ghost that lives in my house. Oh wait, no, that is just me using some simple photo enhancement software. | Source

YouTube and Reality Shows

If you know anything about me at all, you know I absolutely love learning more about paranormal beliefs and the occult. Some people would even say I am downright creepy. That is OK. I've been called worse. If there is a YouTube video that catches a ghost on film or a new paranormal reality show, I am there! I want to see it. I want real evidence. But is any of this stuff actual valid evidence?

The problem with paranormal evidence is very simple, in my opinion. If the evidence looks too real, everyone believes it is a fake. If the evidence is not that clear, well, no one is interested... and the skeptics still say it is fake. So that is the problem. Perhaps there is legit evidence, but if I am not actually sitting there and the ghost taps me on my shoulder, I tend to not believe it either. I think that is the case with many viewers, both the skeptics and believers.

The believers want to believe those YouTube videos cover actual paranormal activity. You know the kind I am talking about. On a fairly regular basis, people post security footage of supposed ghosts on YouTube. With the popularity of ghost reality shows, plenty of folks go out ghost hunting with just a flashlight and their iPhone. Naturally they want to post their findings online. Can we really believe any of this footage is accurate? I don't even know these people, so why am I trusting them?

There seems to be a bit more trust put behind some reality shows that have been airing for a while. For instance, a few of the most popular paranormal shows use scientific instruments and are very technical in their research. But it is TV. Am I to believe every single person on those shows don't have a moment or two when "amping up" the evidence isn't the most logical thing to do on a slow night? I mean, it is entertainment, so give the people what they want.

When the Evidence Is Too Good

To believe or not to believe... that is the question! I applaud any of you that watch these shows just for entertainment purpose. You totally get it. You watch those videos and shows, and you have a good laugh. I wish I could be like you. But I really do want to know how much of this evidence is real, how much is exaggerated, and how much is just totally fake. I have a feeling I am not the only one out there that wants actual proof.

The problem with evidence that is too good is no one actually believes it. There is plenty of free software out there so anyone can fake a ghost photo. You can also add anything you'd like to add to these photos... gnomes, elves, vampires... anything you'd like to fake today. Not only can you easily use computer graphics to enhance any photo or film, you could just go low-budget and have your friend dress like Bigfoot in the forest. After that, a simple 20 second, gritty-looking YouTube video is plenty enough to get you some hits on YouTube.

You might not believe that people are capable of such fakes or you may be the trusting type that can't believe society is so full of liars. However, you never know what some people will do for attention or for money... or better yet... for both attention and money. I've known some pretty honest people to do some uncharacteristically dishonest things when times are tough.

The shame of all of this is, what about the real evidence? Is there some evidence that is actually true, but no one believes it because it looks so convincing that skeptics insist it must be fake? What if the most realistic footage is so realistic because it simply is real paranormal evidence? I want to believe!

Is that a monster caught on a FLIR camera in the middle of the night in the Inner Harbor?  Of course not!  Once again, photo enhancement software added the obviously fake monster to a photo taken in the middle of the day.
Is that a monster caught on a FLIR camera in the middle of the night in the Inner Harbor? Of course not! Once again, photo enhancement software added the obviously fake monster to a photo taken in the middle of the day. | Source

When the Evidence is Not So Good

One of the most frustrating aspects of paranormal evidence is that nothing is really good enough. If the evidence is clear, then it must be a fraud. Obviously computer graphics have been added to the photo or a voice has been added to the tape. So naturally, you would think evidence that is not so clear would be the most respected. This is not true either.

No one wants to look at "evidence" of orbs (small balls of light) because the assumption is either the camera was having lighting issues or it just captured some bugs. If you have to circle the "ghost" in the photo, then people basically laugh it off as not believable. Real evidence should be obvious enough for anyone to see. As far as EVPs (Electronic Voice Phenomenon) goes, the voice on the recorder often must be cranked up to the highest volume and enhanced just to hear it. To skeptics, that is further proof the sounds are just some type of interference.

In many situations, the most unclear evidence probably has a simple explanation. I can't even begin to count how many times I've been watching a paranormal reality show that features some "major" incident that has a logical explanation. Sometimes they debunk the incident themselves. On other shows, I am left thinking about how the image was obviously a shadow or that sound of something falling was probably just a rat knocking something over in the rodent-infested abandoned building.

One theory that explains seeing faces or ghosts in images is an experience called Apophenia. It is also known as "matrixing." Basically, one looks at an image and sees something else in it that does not exist. For example, how many times have you heard about people seeing the image of Jesus in burnt toast? How many times have you seen a face appear in the clouds? I myself used to always see a face in the wood grain in a door at my parents' house. Did this mean anything? Of course not! The mind plays tricks on people and often looks for the familiar in unfamiliar objects.

An orb or just a lamp post in the distance?
An orb or just a lamp post in the distance? | Source

So Now What?

So now, what are we left with after discussing this topic? I don't know about you, but I still crave more knowledge. It would be a huge disappointment to me to think every YouTube video, every reality show, all the photos, and all the EVPs featuring ghosts and other mystery creatures are frauds. I must believe at least some are unexplained mysteries. I myself have experienced some paranormal happenings, so therefore, there must be real evidence out there.

This leaves me with hope. I hope one day there is paranormal evidence I can trust. I want to see the footage that is going to blow my mind. As I said before, I want to believe. I suppose I am a hopeful skeptic when it comes to paranormal evidence. For now, I guess that is all I have.

Copyright ©2014 Jeannieinabottle


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)