Does Dan Gilbert and David Blatt deserve credit for Cav's success?

1. 0

   Stevennix2001posted 8 years ago

   According to ESPN and various other sports writers,  it seems LeBum. Princess....er...um...I'm sorry I mean LEBRON James is supposedly the unofficial owner, gm, and coach of the cavaliers.  In fact, it's gotten so much to the point that whenever the Cavs lose it's all David Blatt's fault for making lousy coaching decisions, yet when they win LeBron gets all the credit because he's not only the team captain, but he's the unofficial coach, gm, owner and etc.  Therefore, Blatt didn't coach the Cavs to the nba finals.  No no no.  Don't be so f**king stupid.  That was LeBron James.  Hes' the unofficial coach of the team, and don't you forget it.   
   
   Besides, David Blatt is ONLY the coach of the Cavaliers whenever they lose.   
   
   As for Dan Gilbert who's supposedly the owner of the Cavaliers, ESPN and various sports writers say he deserves ZERO CREDIT for the Cavs success last year making it to the nba finals because LeBron is the real unofficial owner of the team.
   
   This brings me to ask....is this fair?  Do you really think it's fair to say that LeBron James gets all the credit as the unofficial gm, owner and coach of the team while David Blatt and Dan Gilbert get none?  Or do you think this is another case of the media blowing smoke up our a**es?  Please discuss.

   replyreport