ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel
  • »
  • Technology»
  • Computers & Software»
  • Computer Software

LaTeX versus WYSYWIG: Usability, security and enjoyability

Updated on January 30, 2016
Latex may never give you anything like this but...
Latex may never give you anything like this but...

LaTeX is a typesetting markup language originally developed by Donald Knuth who wanted to produce high quality documents together with software to convert it into a number of output formats. It has been around for more than thirty years and is now capable of just about anything specialist printers can do, except perhaps for setting letterpress fonts in a printing machine. It can also handle cross references and bibliographies.

LaTeX users tend to cluster in Academia, mostly in the hard sciences, including mathematics, though there are users in “softer” disciplines [1]. It is however almost totally absent in enterprise settings. One reason for this is that in enterprise settings there is little call for elegant typesetting and even less appreciation of it. Documents are considered functional and time taken making them look elegant is begrudged.

LaTeX is unlikely ever to penetrate the business world, even software engineering. This is not necessarily a bad thing: it is probably good to preserve the few remaining barriers between Academia and Business.

... This should be a doddle
... This should be a doddle


Knauff [2] conducted an experiment involving four groups of subjects: novice and expert users of Microsoft Word and novice and expert users of LaTeX with three types of document, short continuous text, tex containing a table and equation text. Users were given 30 minutes to transcribe the text into either LaTeX, using a variety of LaTeX Editors, or Word. The results indicated that for short continuous text both novice and expert Word users transcribed more text than either novice or expert LaTeX users in the time allowed while word experts produced more than LaTeX experts and Word Novices produced more text than LaTeX Novices. The number of orthographic and grammatical errors did not differ significantly between Word and LaTeX users but Word experts made significantly fewer formatting mistakes than LaTeX experts and Word novices made significantly fewer formatting mistakes than LaTeX novices and indeed Word novices also made significantly fewer formatting mistakes than LaTeX experts Word experts wrote significantly more text than LaTeX experts and Word novices wrote significantly more text than LaTeX novices.

For the table text Word users (both novices and experts) made significantly fewer formatting mistakes and wrote more text within 30 minutes than LaTeX novice and expert users. Word experts made significantly fewer formatting mistakes than LaTeX experts and Word novices made significantly fewer mistakes than LaTeX novices. Word experts wrote significantly more text than LaTeX experts and Word novices wrote significantly more text than LaTeX novices. Word novices made significantly fewer formatting mistakes and produced more text than LaTeX experts.

Thus for the type of document prevalent in enterprise settings, short texts, or texts with tables LaTeX gave no productivity advantage.

The situation changed for the equation text which contained four numbered equations separated by blocks of text that included cross references. Here LaTeX users (both novices and experts) made significantly fewer formatting mistakes and wrote more text within 30 minutes than Word novices and experts. However, LaTeX users made significantly more orthographic and grammatical errors than Word users. LaTeX novices made significantly fewer formatting mistakes and also wrote more text than Word novices. Overall, however, the performance of LaTeX experts and Word experts did not differ significantly.

Thus for documents with reasonably complex mathematical content LaTeX offered no advantage over Word for experts but some advantage for LaTeX Novices.

The study seems fairly conclusive but needs replication. It would also be beneficial to test users who are expert/novices in each system with similar types of text to determine whether an expert/Novice in both Word and LaTeX could be more productive using one system than another.

This is what Word saves you in business and LaTeX saves you in Academia
This is what Word saves you in business and LaTeX saves you in Academia


Word users rated word as less efficient than LaTeX users but LaTeX users rated their system as harder to learn. However Knauff does not mention any control for the tendency of users to boost their ego by claiming to be proficient in using a more difficult tool. LaTeX users reported the work as less tiresome and less frustrating than Word users and LaTeX users reported enjoying working with LaTeX significantly more often than Word users reported working with Word.

It would seem then that Knauff's research indicates a tradeoff between productivity and the enjoyment of document production that must be considered if specifying a document production system for an organisation, whether in Academia or not. Knauff notes that it may be possible to improve the usability of LaTeX by improving the usability of the editors.

Latex vs Open Office: Personal Experience

Open Office is a free Office suite that provides most, if not all, the features available in Word and allows saving a document in Word format. It seems likely a replication of Knauff's experiments comparing LaTeX and Open Office users would yield the same results regarding productivity but personal experience suggests Open Office users would find their system more enjoyable, than Word even for mathematical equations.

Entering equations into Open Office is relatively easy, though handling cross references in Open Office is somewhat less pleasant and a bit harder than in LaTeX. Bibliographic references are however significantly less pleasant and either require bibliography item in a separate file (which is inelegant unless the bibliography is to be used for more than one document) and more complicated processing, or moderately advanced knowledge of how LaTeX works in order to keep bibliographic references in the same document.

When writing blog posts it is better to prepare texts offline and cut and paste into the blog. I use Open Office to prepare texts and, since hardly any (revenue sharing) sites support mathematics Open Office does the business for me with no need for LaTeX. I find the same for maintaining my CV (resumé for US readers). In particular it is easier to include hyperlinks in Open Office files than in LaTeX.

LaTeX is however more fun to use but can conflict with getting the job done and conversion between LaTeX and Open Office sometimes requires post processing (justification in LaTeX does not always carry over properly when converting to Open Office and LaTeX Equations look ugly in Open Office and cannot be edited in Open office.


LaTeX has an advantage over Word in that a LaTeX document is a pure text file so there is little need to worry about malware in the file should the file contain sensitive information ( unless the malware is hidden stenographically, which would require a compromised version of LaTeX to exploit or uses a package that can run say R, which could be mitigated by inspection)

The problem with LaTeX files that must hold sensitive information ( a rare use case) is confidentiality: The file must be readable only by those authorised to read it. A first layer of defence is disc encryption though this is an obstacle rather than a barrier to a determined attacker. The file must be encrypted with it own password or some other authentication mechanism. In contrast Word and Open Office allow documents to be saved password protected, but not when saving in text format. Once password protected the document can be sent over the internet without toomany worries.

A text document can be encrypted easily when using the command line editor vi, which most technically minded people either understand or can pick up easily but is not suitable for non technical people and would probably significantly diminish productivity compared to using Word or a more sophisticated text editor.

Thus when it comes to protecting confidential information, especially in transit, Word and Open Office have an advantage over LaTeX.

Why LaTeX will not displace Word

Word is the incumbent in the enterprise. Even if LaTeX offered significant advantages it would have to overcome corporate inertia and the sunk cost fallacy (“We have invested too much in Word to throw it away”).

For the bulk of documents produced in business LaTeX offers no real advantage and may even decrease productivity. Beautiful typesetting is not important. If a document has to look good specialist designers are hired. And few documents are long enough to crash Word.

Non technical people using LaTeX cannot protect sensitive information in their documents.

For all these reasons and more, for example the large number of slightly different LaTeX Distributions LaTeX will remain something for academics in certain disciplines where publishers require submissions in LaTeX.

Personally I think this is a good thing. Using LaTeX can be fun and whenever Business adopts a technology it ceases to be fun. But that's what business does.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    No comments yet.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: ""

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)