Why does N America need 'dirty' energy or nuclear reactors?
Curious to know rationale of promoting these sources of energy when we have 'Green' energy that does just as well in providing source of energy.
Dame Scribe, I guess I have to take issue with the question, although reluctantly. I say reluctantly because I really want green energy to work. We do have some very clean types of energy, and we should be using them wherever and whenever the will work for us. But I don't think we can say they do as well as fossil fuels and nuclear energy at this point in time. By "as well" I mean they won't generate the amount of energy that we currently use. Of course we may simply be using too much energy, so conservation is certainly needed.
There is one type of nuclear energy which would be exciting as far as I am concerned. I have two hubs on the subject and they have to do with using helium3 in nuclear fusion. Helium3 is not radioactive and there would be no radioactive waste. The viability of the concept has been confirmed at the University of Wisconsin. There is one problem though. Helium3 is rare on earth, but plentiful on the moon. Many countries as well as private companies are making plans to mine helium3 on the moon. A simple search on the web will confirm this. I have reservations about mining on the moon, but helium3/nuclear fusion has been referred to as the perfect energy source, so I am open to the idea.
by Eugene Hardy5 years ago
Are Small Nuclear Reactors The Answer For Some of our Energy Problems?Just read an article about an upstart company named NuScale and their 64 Mega Watt nuclear power plants, and their technological improvements.What Do...
by Aaron Babb7 years ago
I know technologically America has lost its ground. We're being surpassed by countries like Japan and China in the computer, robotics, and renewable resource field, and the gap is widening every day, but what about...
by thebest0107 years ago
A form of pollution associated with nuclear power reactors is
by Hugh Williamson7 years ago
Nuclear energy is supposed to be part of the new U.S. energy strategy. We are assured that the new plants will be fail safe. How safe are they in the event of an unforeseen disaster, like the Japanese quake?From Yahoo...
by Arthur Russ4 months ago
Why Are so Many Americans in Denial of Human’s Contribution to Climate Change, and the Harm its Doing to the Planet?The evidence is so clear, just to name a few:-• The correlation between the burning of...
by Stacie L6 years ago
US licenses first nuclear reactors since 1978The licensing covers two reactors estimated to cost $14 billion that the Southern Company wants to add to its existing Vogtle nuclear plant in Georgia. Preliminary work has...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.