what OWS is about and data behind it

1. 66

   SparklingJewelposted 12 years ago

   my son in college found this
   
   http://imgur.com/a/U4FR4#5

   replyreport
2. 60

   Moderndayslaveposted 12 years ago

   Maybe this has something to do with it.
   http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/10/17 … tes-obama/

   replyreport
   1. 77

      lovemychrisposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      "Are we saying Obama may not be “Bush 2″ after all but that those who report this may have another agenda, one meant to confuse the American public and provide cover for years of Republican wrongdoing? Is this why Obama supports “Occupy?”
      ******
      Yes, exactly. Obama is nothing like Bush, but the Bushites (daddy) still control.
      This is why they are now saying "both parties are to blame"...it gives them cover to attack Obama, while looking like they are "fair and balanced". Come on...when did Repubs EVER say Booh about Repubs when they were in charge????
      
      I think Obama also knows what Fort Hood was all about...nothing to do with "a crazy muslim shooting people up". He once said in a speech, "We've been Hoodwinked."--that is the term used by people who don't buy the Ft Hood media story. Ft Hood had to do with stolen gold, according to them. They always use violence, and "bad muslims" as  cover for their crimes. Gives them a two-fer! 1.They get to do bad things
      2.They have a perpetual enemy to blame...whom others will glory in hating.
      ****
      
      "Let’s look at what we know.
      
      Obama didn’t close “Gitmo” but are they getting new prisoners?  The news has a forced blackout on that.  Why?
      
      When Obama and Geithner “smacked down” Wall Street, why wasn’t it reported?  It happened.
      
      I don’t think they went far enough but Wall Street hardly supports Obama as “the controlled alternative press” continually states.
      
      They are totally behind the GOP and spending millions on the nutty new Republican candidates.
      
      Why is the press not reporting this?  Who does it help?  Who controls the press?"
      
      ****
      DUH! Press has never been "liberal".....even the "liberal" press hammers Obama.....
      
      Who speaks up for him? Reverand Al....and he is branded another one "with a deep-seated hatred of white people."
      
      Psychopaths Rule. They are sick twisted beings. Any one decent does not stand a chance.....and the real sick ones are given hero treatment. IMO

      replyreport
3. 77

   lovemychrisposted 12 years ago

   "What am I saying?  Most people are evaluating what President Obama has done based on information from sources we know to be pathologically inaccurate, owned and controlled by the organizations the world has risen against.
   
   It’s not just the OCW (Occupy) movements but the Arab Spring and the news suppressed uprising in Israel, its Jewish population demanding the removal of Netanyahu’s military dictatorship?
   
   You  mean you never heard Israel called a military dictatorship before, the “only democracy” in the Middle East? 
   
   Then ask yourself, how can 500,000 Israeli Jews demonstrate without any reporting at all reaching North America or Europe?"
   ****
   
   Halleluyah! Jews don't like Ziocons either!!!
   And they can't be called Anti-Semites for it.

   replyreport
4. 77

   lovemychrisposted 12 years ago

   "Why is the press not reporting this?  Who does it help?  Who controls the press?"
   *****
   Republicans Getting a Pass on Their Jobs Plans
   —By Kevin Drum
   Tue Oct. 18, 2011 9:18 AM PDT.Greg Sargent wants to know why the media is giving Republicans a huge pass on their various "jobs plans":
   
   "Obama and the Senate GOP have both introduced jobs plans. In reporting on the Senate plan, many news organizations described it as a “GOP jobs plan.” And that’s fine — Rand Paul said it would create five million of them. But few if any of the same news orgs that amplified the GOP offering of a jobs plan are making any serious effort to determine whether independent experts think there’s anything to it. And independent experts don’t think there’s anything to it — they think the GOP jobs plan would not create any jobs in the near term, and could even hurt the economy. By contrast, they do think the Obama plan would create jobs and lead to growth.
   
   Why aren’t these facts in every single news story about the ongoing jobs debate? Why aren’t they being broadcast far and wide?
   
   I’m trying to think of the reasons for this....[One] possible reason: Reporters and editors don’t take the GOP jobs plan seriously enough to have it evaluated by independent experts. But if this is the case, isn’t this something readers and viewers should know about? News consumers who read or view stories about the GOP jobs plan without being told this vital information risk coming away thinking that both sides are making an equally serious contribution to the debate. If reporters and editors don’t believe this, isn’t that pertinent info for their customers?"

   replyreport