Which is the better of the two: a president who wins the election by popular vote or a president who wins by the electorial vote? What are the safeties and dangers of the two?
How about the current one who won by both.
Reagan did too. How do you like him?
I prefer the popular vote, even though that could be an administrative nightmare in practice., as the voice and the will of the people are more direct. The danger is the contention much like occured in the election of 2000.
Greetings, Mr. Savage. Thank you for launching this thread.
U.S. Constitution, Article II…
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”
There have been many proposals in the past to abolish or to revise the Electoral College. It is an issue that comes up every four years ad nauseam. In spite of the frequently of these efforts, they have ALL failed largely because the alternatives to the EC are far more problematic than is the College itself. The nation would face a number of negative ramifications from changing a system that has worked for over 200 years and is not at all broken.
What do Andrew Jackson (1824), Samuel J. Tilden (1876), Grover Cleveland (1888), and Al Gore (2000) have in common? After 220 years, 56 presidential election cycles, and 44 elected presidents, these four men are the ONLY candidates for President of the United States to win a plurality of the popular vote and to loose in the EC. This 4-out-of-56 record clearly shows that the system is overwhelming effective in electing candidates not only favored by the majority of the nation's population, but also favored by the majority within the individual states. The EC strikes a brilliant balance between federalism, states' rights and individual equality. To eliminate the EC to promote individual equality places the principles of federalism and state's rights at risk when it is all three that make our republic unique. {1}
History shows us that the EC functioned remarkably well for over 200 years; achieved all of the Constitutional objectives for which it was created; and has agreed with the sentiments of the majority of voters in 52 out of 56 elections. More importantly, it is one of the last surviving vestiges of states' rights.
In practice, the Electoral College combines both the size of a candidate's popular support with the distribution of that support among the states. It represents two majority votes not just one! The system is overwhelming effective in balancing the majority of the nation’s popular vote with the majority of the populations within each individual state. Doing away with the EC just to promote individual equality places another principal of states’ right at risk. When all state’s rights have been eliminated the 3–legged stool of federalism, states’ rights, and individual equality collapses along with all of our safeguards against tyranny.
The purpose of the EC is to stabilize the whole election process. Without it, the presidential election could be unfairly influenced by the nine states with over 50% of the population leaving little or no influence in those 25 states with a combined population of only 17% of the total nation. {2}
In my opinion, if it ain’t broke don’t try to fix it!
{1} http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781450.html
{2} http://exploredia.com/population-of-us-states-2011/
Those four mentioned presidential candidates would have changed the course of history for the better. The federation does not operate as a republic for the people when the electoral college has impeded the popular vote for one single vote- one single election is too many.
Listen, if you only make up 17% of the population, then you only account for 17% of the vote.
The electoral vote failed 11% of the time. If an elevator failed that many times you would have to be an idiot to gamble your life to get to the top.
Not only is electoral voting ineffective, inefficient, non-democratic-republican; it is a violation under any nation under martial law with a ruling military power investing its efforts into restoring the constitution, or law, of the said nation.
It is the means to keeping the under-privileged of a nation in the belly of the beast.
The system is either bought out, or broken... Either way it is not going to last if it is not able to change. Like communism, it only works in one's subjective imagination, and ultimately fails in objective reality. Based off of your presentation of data and opinion, you are more likely a subjectivist, rather than an objectivist.
Hi, Mr . Savage. Thank you for your prompt reply.
In your last sentence, (“you are more likely a subjectivist, rather than an objectivist.”) you falsely accuse me of being something I am not. In your first, (“Those four mentioned presidential candidates would have changed the course of history for the better.”) you make a totally subjective claim which, by its very nature, you can not possibly prove.
It is hard to believe you wrote the following:
“The federation does not operate as a republic for the people when the electoral college [sic] has impeded the popular vote for one single vote- one single election is too many.”
My dear friend, the United States has conducted its elections as a republic in full and faithful compliance with its constitution since its founding. Our Constitution calls for the election of the president and vice-president by the states and not by a popular vote. Your personal viewpoint is hardly a good reason to change the Constitution.
“The electoral vote failed 11% of the time,” you said. “If an elevator failed that many times you would have to be an idiot to gamble your life to get to the top.” Surely, you are not suggesting that a political process that is 89% successful is hazardous to my health! Your comparison leaves me speechless.
Your wrote:
[i]“Not only is electoral voting ineffective, inefficient, non-democratic-republican; it is a violation under any nation under martial law with a ruling military power investing its efforts into restoring the constitution, or law, of the said nation.”
It is your expressed opinion the Electoral College…
…is ineffective when it is historically consistent with the popular vote in all but four cases. {1}
…is inefficient when in a truly close election, counting all the final ballots, absentee ballots, and provisional ballots would take a huge amount of time and would seriously delay the final results. {2}
…is non-democratic-republican when our particular republic empowers the states to elect the president based upon the popular vote within each individual state. {3}
…is a violation under any nation under martial law when our country is not now nor has it ever been under to martial law. (Even pro-popular-vote advocates will raise an eyebrow over this one!)
Thank you Mr. Savage for sharing your views. It is my experience that reasonable points sometimes need to be clarified but they never need to be repeated. Have a great night.
{1} http://www.history.com/topics/president … tion-facts
{2} http://articles.latimes.com/2012/dec/15 … e-20121214
{3} http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0749819.html
by ptosis 11 years ago
"A constitutional amendment, which requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress (or a Convention under Article V of the Constitution) and ratification in three-fourths of all fifty states, would be required." - https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti … e/GZQtFSPVCheck out...
by Faith Reaper 7 years ago
I may be a bit naive on this topic, but I believe that my vote should count. I understand the history and all, but I still think one's vote should count, and the candidate who receives the most votes should win. What are your thoughts. Please help me to understand why the...
by Dan Harmon 7 years ago
It seems that at least two electors from Texas have decided to cast their electoral college vote not for the man they promised to, but someone else.Christopher Suprun is one of those faithless electors:"That was also the last time I remember the nation united," Suprun wrote. "I watch...
by Mike Russo 7 years ago
People are protesting President Elect Trump? Because Hillary won the popular vote by .3% Trump = 47.4%, Hillary = 47.7%, but she lost the electoral college. That means more people voted for Hillary's platform than for Trump's. The electoral college must go. It is outdated and was for a younger...
by Credence2 11 years ago
excerpt from a recent article"After back-to-back presidential losses, Republicans in key states want to change the rules to make it easier for them to win.From Wisconsin to Pennsylvania, GOP officials who control legislatures in states that supported President Barack Obama are considering...
by ga anderson 5 years ago
Let me channel Jake for a moment...BIG BREAKING NEWS! Bombshell announcement! A CONSTITUTIONAL crisis!Deleware has voted to join eleven other states in awarding their 3 electoral college votes to the national popular vote winner!The votes of state voters in these 12 states no longer matter! YOUR...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |