sort by best latest
Tim Mitchell says
Dana Tate says
Yes Dana, it seems that really for the ego to mean something negative you have to put a modifier on it. I was wondering why it gets such a bad wrap when we all have one.
I am beginning to think that we use ego to mean that part of self that is for everyone else. And in that I think we can make real progress with our self by tempering it both rationally and spiritually. I am so mellow I might need to boost my ego ;-)
Sparlea, it is good to hear from you. I can tell you are doing well and that is good. I googled it also. It seems that ego really just is, Too much is bad. Too little is bad. But it does seem just about the same as "self". Thank you.
Very hectic, behind in everything...Husband very ill New Years Day, landed in hospital with blood infection. 14 days of IV antibiotics at Infusion Center, doing well...hoping to get back on track. Holidays hectic too. :)
- See all 2 commentsHide extra comments
Josh Cantrell says
So you think that when we say ego it means the negative portion of the self?
Not necessarily. We all have an ego. But confidence in ones self is different than showing everyone your ego.
Josh, that is why I am asking this question -- what do you mean by showing your ego. What is the ego that is different than the self? I know we have words like egotistical that have negative stuff attached. But why?
Showing your ego would be posturing or pea cocking. Letting everyone know how good you are. The self is knowing that you can achieve great things without having to tell everyone how great you are.
So Ego is the outer self, which we show off. So I gather ego is part of the self in your way of thinking.
- See all 5 commentsHide extra comments