jump to last post 1-7 of 7 discussions (20 posts)

a report that claims to provide the numerous SS numbers of Obama..

  1. SparklingJewel profile image66
    SparklingJewelposted 7 years ago

    for any of you that know how to do extensive research...check this out and let us know how true it is...

    http://fs7.formsite.com/C4Strategies/fo … index.html

    1. profile image0
      Brenda Durhamposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I is skeered to follow links......some have led to bad bad viruses.  Not sayin' that one will, but...

      Anyhow, I'm interested in checking it out if/when I can..

      1. AdsenseStrategies profile image72
        AdsenseStrategiesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Brenda, you hit the nail on the head. I mean, why should you give away your email address to some website...

  2. profile image61
    foreignpressposted 7 years ago

    To avoid a potential virus, highlight "the numerous SS numbers of Obama" and then Google it. That will provide numerous (virus screened) links to the actual data. I have a definite personal bias toward Obama (I think he's a Chicago crook with a shady background), but if you, Brenda, could provide more information on this particular link you're referring to that would help. In the meantime, I'd like to learn more. I'm presently following an article re: Scotland Yard and Obama.

    1. profile image61
      foreignpressposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Sorry, I meant if SparklingJewel could provide more info.

  3. Doug Hughes profile image61
    Doug Hughesposted 7 years ago

    Do you all go to the same asylum  - oris there a mail-order course in wingnut conspiracy theories? You got tired of the 'he's not president cause he wasn't born on this planet' bit. Try something new.. That's good - we all need a laugh.

    1. Arthur Fontes profile image89
      Arthur Fontesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      Doug, if Obama had several ss#'s and aliases would that shock you?

      1. Doug Hughes profile image61
        Doug Hughesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        This is such a distraction. Bush left this country in a mess.. He did it with the GOP formula. Low taxes - no regulation. Exactly  the same lead-up to the Great Depression. So we are  doing open heart surgery to save the nation and you guys want us to worrry about trimming toenails.

        I do not know, nor do I care about the SS# and alias story. It's just something shiny to distract the masses. After we pass cap and trade - and get things right with unions - and make progress on education, fair taxes to get the deficit down, then bother me with something silly. I will be in a mood to indulge you.

        1. Arthur Fontes profile image89
          Arthur Fontesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          It was not such a silly subject that you ignored this thread was it?

    2. AdsenseStrategies profile image72
      AdsenseStrategiesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I mean, for God's sake.. the Democrats can be criticized on a ton of REAL issues (as can the Republicans). This horseshit just makes people look like dumbasses. If you're going to criticize your government, please do so intelligently... for the sake of your entire political system (which, sitting here on the outside, just looks wacko, if these threads are anything to go by).

      1. Doug Hughes profile image61
        Doug Hughesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Adsense it's not wacko - it's deliberate - it's orchestrated and it's brilliant. The idea is to keep the average guy entertained and distracted so he doesn't catch on to the truth. Whether it's the birth certificate thing - which this is a variation of - or any number of silly claims - it works.

        1. AdsenseStrategies profile image72
          AdsenseStrategiesposted 7 years ago in reply to this

          I see you joined during my absence. And thank God you did. Everything I've read from you today knocks the spots off what most of the rest of us usually write on these forums.

  4. ledefensetech profile image78
    ledefensetechposted 7 years ago

    Don't worry about it Doug.  When it's all said and done, Obama is going to go down as the worst President since Jimmy Carter.  About the only thing he hasn't done that Carter did is institute price floors and ceilings.  Still, he has a few years in office yet and he's already shown he's willing to hold the food supply of this nation hostage in order to push through legislation he wants.

    1. Ralph Deeds profile image69
      Ralph Deedsposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      I would have supposed that a libertarian like you would like Carter because, under the influence of the Chicago Boys, he deregulated the Airline and Trucking industries, nearly breaking the back of the Teamster's Union and bringing pilots' wages down close to the minimum wage today (slight exaggeration).

      1. ledefensetech profile image78
        ledefensetechposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Sure Ralph, he might have done that, but he did worse damage by instituting price floors and ceilings.  Looks like the government economists didn't learn anything from when Nixon did that in 1973 to control the massive inflation that occurred after he took us off the gold standard.

        Just because I agree with a particular action doesn't mean that I can forgive the sins of Carter.  He did more things wrong than he did right.  One other good thing he did, for example, was to appoint Paul Volcker to the Fed.  His prescription was painful, to say the least, but it never would have been done in a second Carter administration.  It took a trained economist like Reagan to understand the need for the Fed to raise interest rates to 15% and hold them there until all the excess liquidity of the past decades was destroyed.

    2. The Dix View profile image61
      The Dix Viewposted 7 years ago in reply to this

      It was Nixon who set price floors and ceilings, and that was durning one of our worst bouts of inflation.  Wasn't Nixon a republican?
      Regan spent us into the recesion that was so deep, Bush sr. had to raise taxes.
      Wern't those two Republicans also?

      I won't even comment on W, who will no doubt go down in history as our worst president.

      How is it that the menories on who did what gets so twisted?  All of this stuff is written history.  All youhave to do is check.  Nixon froze prices,  not a federalist, states rights kinda thing, is it?  What kind of social government do you call it when the leader can freeze prices?

      1. ledefensetech profile image78
        ledefensetechposted 7 years ago in reply to this

        Carter did the same thing, only with gas prices.  That's why we had lines for gas in 1979.  You also might consider that you don't know as much about politics as you think you do.  Progressive policies, which is what inflationary economic policies are, have been used by both parties since the start of the 20th century.  Teddy Roosevelt (R) started it followed by Wilson (D), followed by Hoover (R) followed by FDR (D). 

        Perhaps you should be less partisan and more open to the realities of history.

        Doug, think again.  Hoover started many of the programs that FDR turned into the New Deal.  Accept that fact that your teachers in history lied to you and didn't teach you what really went on.

        http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard184.html

        So much for do-nothing Hoover.  Are you even aware that FDR ran under a platform to eliminate the interventions Hoover began?

        http://reason.com/archives/2008/04/10/t … roosevelts

        But then again why let the truth interfere with good propaganda.

  5. Uninvited Writer profile image82
    Uninvited Writerposted 7 years ago

    Wouldn't the FBI and CIA have checked that out?

  6. Arthur Fontes profile image89
    Arthur Fontesposted 7 years ago

    Did Clinton inhale?

  7. Arthur Fontes profile image89
    Arthur Fontesposted 7 years ago

    Did Bush show up for his National Guard duty?

 
working