Is the Queen of England the descendant of Jesus Christ?

1. 42

   Emmanuel Marosiposted 10 years ago

   Is the Queen of England the descendant of Jesus Christ?

   replyreport
2. 82

   Attikosposted 10 years ago

   Show me the complete chain of certified birth records back to Year 0, and I'll consider the question.
   
   Oh. Wait a moment. There aren't any.
   
   I guess there's no fact-based answer to this one, then.

   replyreport
3. 0

   JThomp42posted 10 years ago

   Jesus Christ had no children, therefore how could this be possible? It cannot.

   replyreport
   1. 82

      Attikosposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      In all fairness, we do not really know that. The Gospels make no comment on it one way or the other.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      JThomp42posted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Jesus was "Deity" in the flesh. If there was something of this importance it would definitely be in the 4 gospels. It is ridiculous to even think Jesus Christ had children. He was free of sin!! This act would have required fornication, Jesus was not

      replyreport
   3. 82

      Attikosposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Fornication would not necessarily have been involved. We do not so much as know He was never married. In truth, we know little of Jesus and His life.

      replyreport
   4. 0

      JThomp42posted 10 years agoin reply to this

      We know enough to know he did not have children. Look how important the child of Jesus Christ would have been looked at. Jesus even told his disciples to put "ALL" things aside if they were to follow him. It is pure nonsense to think Jesus had a chil

      replyreport
   5. 82

      Attikosposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      He was considered a rabbi, a teacher, at the time. He was even called by that title. That would not have conferred great status on His children. Most rabbis had families. Try looking at this through the facts we have, not the lens of custom.

      replyreport
   6. 0

      jonnycomelatelyposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      JThomp42 , your idea that the sexual act is inherently sin is the epitome of stupidity and the reason christianity will die a natural death.  It's highly likely that Jesus did have sex and did have children.

      replyreport
   7. 0

      JThomp42posted 10 years agoin reply to this

      jonnycomelately......... Your idea that Jesus Christ did have children is one of the most stupid assumptions I have heard. If you would actually read the bible instead of books written by "pagans" such as yourself you would be much more intelligent!

      replyreport
4. 0

   Justsilvieposted 10 years ago

   If we could get DNA samples from both we would know the answer.  I have read that Queen Elizabeth, is a direct descendant of King David of the Old Testament.

   replyreport
   1. 82

      Attikosposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      The same problem arises there, too, of course. There are neither reliable records nor DNA source material. May as well say she descends from a space alien. That too has no proof or refutation.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      Justsilvieposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      I Know, but it was interesting reading!

      replyreport
5. 0

   jonnycomelatelyposted 10 years ago

   Emmanuel, I am trying to respect you for your question, and maybe there is background to your understanding, coming from Papua New Guinea, that influences your question....
   The lineage of the monarchs of England is very long and well documented.  We understand that there is a direct genetic link in them all since 1066 (William ("The Conqueror") of Normandy.
   Before that, in the British Isles, the various kings are documented, I believe, but I am not a historian and therefore not qualified to talk about it.
   There seems to be, even to this day, an inherent desire amongst British people to look up to a Sovereign person, a focus for inspiration and leadership.
   You will find a similar need amongst people who need a spiritual leader.  Maybe this is the basis for your question.
   As others have answered here, there is no way anyone could give a conclusive answer to your question but on the world scale apparently we are ALL linked genetically.  On that basis you are my ?th cousin.  Welcome.

   replyreport
6. 67

   Lady Guinevereposted 10 years ago

   I am not sure if she is or is not but there is a book by Laurence Gardener that gives the lineage of Jesus.  Part of the book is on-line at this site:  http://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/conspi … 0Grail.pdf

   replyreport
7. 70

   connorjposted 10 years ago

   
   
   If she is indeed linked genetically she certainly did not display many similar qualities. I believe she is not; however, I certainly have no proof on either side of this argument. Now many kings and queens tried to elevate themselves to a similar state of God; yet, it was futile and bordered on the ridiculous...

   replyreport
   1. 0

      jonnycomelatelyposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Except that Queen Elizabeth did not "elevate" herself.  She was born to it, no choice.  She is there only by the will of the people and she has declared her self Servant of the People right from the start.

      replyreport
8. 67

   WalterPoonposted 10 years ago

   Is the Queen of England the descendant of Jesus Christ?
   
   Not, unless the Queen of England is a Jew, in which case, we still have to trace her ancestry. But if she is not a Jew, then there's no need to waste our time because it is obvious that she's not. Reason: Jesus was never a Christian. He was a Jew.

   replyreport
   1. 42

      Emmanuel Marosiposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      then how come christianity came into existence?

      replyreport
   2. 0

      jonnycomelatelyposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Not at the instigation of that man Jesus, that is for sure.

      replyreport
   3. 67

      WalterPoonposted 10 years agoin reply to this

      Jonnycomelately, you are right. Jesus was never a Christian. Christianity was founded by St. Paul, after Jesus' death. Paulianity would have been more apt a name for the religion that he founded.

      replyreport