|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
I'm interested in this topic. It is very close to my heart. In most organisations discrimination is not obvious. Age, gender, disability or religion are never given as a reason 'not' to progress or employ somebody.
However, if you were personally sure that you are being disdvantaged on the grounds of discrimination, would you be brave enough to raise it? Would you be better off ignoring it or would you tackle it with the risk it could end your relationship with your employer?
no, descrimination of any kind should not be tolerated or even allowed. anyone who says otherwise is selling something. as rod serling once said in an episode of the twilight zone, "in a system that promotes inequality, then perhaps that system is flawed."
i wouldn't discuss the topic because of course it would be denied by the employer and it would make work more uncomfortable, etc...if you want to make a point, it would be best to build a case privately - lots of concrete evidence and then bring it out but with legal backing. I guess it depends on the discrimination etc. Some issues are really hard to prove and it depends on how smart/savvy the employer or boss is. And if you don't want to bother with revealing concrete evidence...find other work where you are happy rather than staying in a job that you feel discriminated in.
I think too, you have to be sure it is discimation you are facing and not a lack of experience or knowledge that is hindering promotion. If you aren't sure that it is discrimation, then having a discussion with your boss about what you need to do to get ahead/promoted could be the answer. Basically discussing the issue without revealing you feel like you are being discrimated - because that may not be the case. I guess you could look at it a few ways.
It is a tough one because you can never be 100% sure and in my own experience it has never come directly from my boss but from people senior to him who wouldn't have the same knowledge about the person's skills or ability.
I guess the fundamental question is, do you rock the boat? A person's reputation is a very fickle thing and your perceived negative actions are remembered for a long time.
Stevennix2001 - in an ideal world I agree with you but I guess we all have to weigh up what is going to give us the best outcome in the long run.
if other people depend on my salary I would pretend that everything is fine and just go on.
I used to run retail stores, and I remember sitting around with other managers from other stores who would complain about being passed over because of their race or their gender or their age. They would always point out that their stores had such-and-such averages and that they did this or that better than most other stores, etc.
What they NEVER mentioned, not once, ever was the stuff they didn't do well. The stuff about them that was average, the stuff that they sucked at, and the stuff that they didn't even know.
You (broader "you" not you specifically) don't know what you don't know, so, if you are being held back and don't know why, it is very natural to assume that there is some external reason. It's the old internal locus of control versus external locus thing. It's almost reflexive to assume that if we can't see why something isn't going our way, it has to be a conscious effort by someone else.
I'm not saying it isn't, but more often than not, people don't advance because they aren't ready for (or worthy of) advancement. A meeting with superiors in which a person asks, "Hey, I feel like I should be moving up, and I am not. What am I missing? What do I need to fix or learn?" can often yield amazing information if you have the right attitude and ask it respectfully.
yeah, i can agree with that. that's another reason why i feel that's why our economy is suffering these days. as americans typically have a sense of entitlement and always brag about how we're allegedly the best at everything. yet it's the other countries that are outsourcing us, and are working a heck of a lot harder than us. while putting even more pride into their work. not saying that some americans aren't like that, but the vast majority aren't as hard working as they claim to be. hence, that's why i think if things continue the way we're headed, america will no longer be the dominant super power within the next 10 to 20 years from now.
Often we dont realize that SITUATION would choose SOMEONE for certain reason & may not be necessarily a case of discrimination. i.e. If my office decides to make a Basketball team theres a high chance that I wont be selected because Im not that tall.
If my office decides to arrange a TV show, theres a chance that my beautiful lady colleague would be the TV hostess because of her charm despite the fact that I possess more command on the the related subject...Being a smart male employee, I can consider it as Gender discrimination but I wont.
Thus defining the borderline of discrimination is very important...because theres no fixed borderline. Its relative from time to time. What is applicable in my scenario may not be the same in urs.
Now if there is really a case of discrimination, then whether to raise voice against it or not depends on two things:
1) the situation of the employee & 2) the culture of the organization
If raising voice suits both 1 & 2, then I guess he/she should respond against it. However, if any of 1 or 2 is not in favorable condition i.e. (1) the employee cant risk his/her job or (2) the culture is unfair & cannot be changed with single complain etc. then it is better to keep ur mouth shut.
by Grace Marguerite Williams13 months ago
What would you say to a recently terminated/fired employee? What is the MAIN ADVICE you would giveto him/her? Be factual in your response.
by thirdmillenium3 years ago
On the other hand, a plain/outright ugly girl OK if efficient?
by Annie6 years ago
Should employers, have a say in if their employee lose weigh or not?According to a survey a lot of employee called in sick, due to ilness related to weigh gainwhat do you think?
by Marlena Oechsner6 years ago
"I'm very punctual." That was my response when a woman asked me why I am a good worker during a phone interview. "Okay," she responded, "but what would your current supervisor have to say about...
by ahorseback4 weeks ago
Prof. Randa Jarrar "I am a tenured professor so you cannot fire me for whatever I say " This college professor went off the handle when Barbara Bush died making some pretty nasty public remarks ,...
by Dave Mathews6 years ago
Do you think it legally right and proper for any Human Resources Manager holding job interviews to hire a new employee, to inquire about a candidate's smoking habits, and is it right for them to refuse you employment...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.