Washington state is an "AT WILL" state and most employers are under the assumption that they don't have to have a reason to fire an employee. One employer actually told me that he could fire a person because he didn't like the patch on her shirt! Because I was not at all sure that was true I made some phone calls, spoke with a judge and an assistant general attorney and found out that yes an employer does have to have a viable reason to fire employee. Are you working in an AT WILL state? What do you think of this policy?
The "at will" stipulation must be on the application, so that the person who is filling out the application knows. Employers must make sure that employees know this beforehand.
I live in Mass and "at will" employment is part of it, but is on each application.
On a side note- "at will" employment gives too much power to the company.
It is called "Right To Work" here in Arkansas. Employers tell you they can fire you "at will" anytime they please. I have seen it done many times.
But...Federal Labor Laws/EEOC rules do apply. This is why the chart is displayed on Employers wall.
It is often difficult to prove the employer broke the law when they will have employees that want to keep their jobs lie to back them up if needed. False paperwork can be easily written to cover the tracks of the employer.
Just as a former employer is not allowed to "trash a former worker"...easy way around it. Commonly known here that all the former employer has to say is..."No Comment" and it is understood!
A better way around it is for a new employer to ask an old employer if they would re-hire the employee. The old employer can tell the new employer..outright- "No, we would not re-hire them".
So much for not "blacklisting", huh?
Got that right! I remember a young guy who was fired last summer. he just wasn't cut out for commercial electrical construction on a fast-paced job.
The young guy applied to am "electrical supply house" for a job position. I think he would have probably fit there. He had the computer skills needed and the knowledge of the materials.
I was in hearing range of the boss when he got the call from the supply house for a reference. I was Amazed at how bad he trashed the young man. Call him totally worthless and sorry!
Just because the young man was not cut out for our job, does Not mean he is Worthless!!!
That’s not exactly correct, First the AT WILL phrase relates to Employers and their rights to choose the type of employees they want hire, mostly it allows the employer the right to hire union or non-union workers or both. The Right to Work state states are geared more towards employees in that an worker has the right to work without being forced to join a union. Many states have laws supporting both.
An Employer in either scenario still can terminate the employment of any employee for any reason “other” than those specifically listed and protected by federal law, namely age, sex, creed, or religion.
It is what employers in Arkansas call it, Right to work. They use this as their excuse to do whatever they want to believing Federal Laws do not matter. I work here and have seen it and heard those words from so many employers in Arkansas. Whether that is the "original use" of the term or not, it is what they call it here.
Plus, Arkansas is not a big Union state either.
I understand that MW I was just explaining the difference between the two and if memory serves, Arkansas when I used to run crews there, qualified as both.
I see what you are saying. Arkansas is different than most states. The problem here is that in most cases, even lawyers and legislators will back an employer's rights over those of any employee. It is almost next to impossible for anyone to win a legal action against an employer here.
Wow, that is a real shame! And probably not enough witnesses to make a case either, huh.
The others around would not have said anything. I had no choice but to let it go.
Hey Bellamie, that's why I said what I said. Many states have in place a no "blacklist" law, which means that an employer cannot say anything negative about a previous employee to a future employer.
The way around it is for the new employer to ask the singular question- "Would you re-hire the individual?" - if the previous employer says "No!", then that's all the new employer needs to know and can turn down the applicant.
Yes it is true, an employer can fire you simply for not liking the cut of your jib. However, there are protections given to you under the law. An employer may not fire you if, you are injured, filed workers comp, whistle blower, race, gender, creed, or sexual orientation. If you believe you are being discriminated against for any one of these reasons, I would do my best to document all that you can. If you are in fact fired because of one of these reasons, you have a right to sue on grounds of wrongful termination.
AH, Worker's Comp. I was fired immediately after the Workman Comp. people sent me a check after "They Chose" to close my case. I had no say in that.
Of course I was back to work and doing the job, but when the Office staff groups together you have no recourse. Illegal, yes, but that is the way it goes in Arkansas. Worker's Comp laws here are written to protect employers, not the employees from illegal and harmful work conditions.
In many states an employer is allowed to fire you for your sexual orientation. I don't know how many at the moment, but a few years ago it was 33. Quite disturbing.
As I recall the laws there are just about the same as here in FLA and a lot of the southern states.
I'm not sure AT WILL is so bad. Of course it can be abused but the other side is loser, lazy employees that can't be fired without the company having to pay for them.
by Marlena Oechsner6 years ago
"I'm very punctual." That was my response when a woman asked me why I am a good worker during a phone interview. "Okay," she responded, "but what would your current supervisor have to say about...
by goldentoad8 years ago
Say you were getting a new job and the former employer,the owner of your company was not only a cheat, but a low life human being who made people work unpaid Overtime, gave no benefits, received kickbacks, and made...
by shopgirl178 years ago
Employers are asking for more and more. I'm currently a Store Manager that has to work a MINIMUM of 45 hours a week, but only get benefited for 40.I have to run the Store, get a minimum of 90% on Secret Shops, dust the...
by nmdonders5 years ago
What was your experience and how did you handle it (quit, suck it up)?
by Credence24 years ago
It has got to be an employer's market, a cousin of mine called and said that he got a job. The employer said that he was to work part time and was expected to be on call virtually at all times the store was open. Of...
by Grace Marguerite Williams5 years ago
There are times when an employee gets the boot so to speak. Reasons for being terminated can be either tangible or intangible. It is reasonable that an incorregible, untrustworthy, subpar, insubordinate, and...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.