One of the things I try and improve is my average visit duration. I've moved it from about 35 seconds to close to a minute. What do you consider a good Average Visit Duration? Is it worth culling some hubs that seem to get a low AVD?
Good topic, and I'd like to hear some discussion.
Where are you getting AVD? I use "Average time on page", accessed from Analytics, content, content drilldown. Is that the same thing?
I think it's probably an average of those figures. I simply go to 'Home' when logging on to analytics and voila - there it is!
OK, how do you separate out the junk? The slide show views, the visits to ----=done, the translations, etc.? I find a tremendous number of views to those kinds of things that show up in the "time on page" and if not removed they will skew the results horribly.
Use the Content > Site Content > Content Drill-down to look at /hubs/. As you mentioned, Average Visit Duration includes things that are not Hubs.
Oops, I missed one category. You're right - that's what I use and then ignore all the visits that aren't to the actual hub.
If you allow all the non-hub visits to be included in an average the results are nearly worthless. I see nearly as many views that are NOT to the hub as there are to the hub, and all those other views are mostly of zero duration or very low.
Thanks, Derek. I didn't know that. The average visit duration showing on my Standard Reporting page is only 1:01, but when I used Content > Site Content > Content Drill-down to look at /hubs/ as you suggested, my Avg Time on Page is 1:56... so much better. Cool!
I would like some tips on how to increase the on page time as increasing that and reducing bounce rate would be good. Unless of course they are leaving to go to Amazon or by clicking on an ad.on the page.
Remember some people do not read a hub all in one go. Instead they take a note of your hub and return to read it over a couple of days or more....
That's an interesting question. I've just started watching the average visit duration stat on Google Analytics. My hubs have been averaging about 1 minute. I'm just beginning to look at why some have longer durations and some have shorter durations.
The average time on page for all Hubs is about 3 minutes. The most highly trafficked Hubs (i.e. 100k+ visits/mo) are typically higher, about 5-7 minutes.
The site-wide average visit duration is about 1 min, but that includes lots of stuff that isn't Hubs so not as interesting.
Now that's interesting, and perhaps valuable information.
Ahhh - that makes my figures look a lot better! Thanks for the info!
Oh dear, the average time on page for all hubs is about 3 mins... my avg time on page is only 1:56... below average. And to think I was happy with that compared to 1:01 with all the junk in. No wonder my hubber score sucks. I'm a below average hubber with below average hubs.
And thanks for the info, Derek. Merry Christmas!
Huh... about how long would you guess that an article might need to find its legs in order for this metric to be relevant? I mean, one of my hubs seems to be doing really well with this metric, just over 6 min, but it's readership is like 100, not 100k. I'm also relatively new so I don't know the flow of things yet
G.A. tells me my average visit time for my questions is 00:00:00. I know that's a crock. What's up with that?
My basic question does G think that is site wide?
I don't know how to get a Average Visit Duration for questions, I just have Time On Page, which is roughly the same as for Hubs.
Thank you for the Analytics tip - my AVD looks a lot better now! Though I don't have enough views altogether for it to matter too much (just barely broke 10,000) . I have a feeling I might be skewing my own AVD by keeping my in-process hubs open for hours at a time. Does anyone know if hubs open on an editing page count for duration?
When you're editing a Hub the URL is different so if you drill down to /hub/ then those visits are not included.
You could also set up a filter in GA to exclude traffic from your own IP address if you really want to. Probably more trouble than it's worth imho.
by tristam15 10 years ago
Hey fellow hubbers,I've been posting quite a few hubs recently and I've also been doing quite a lot of SEO for them however, there is some part of the puzzle that just isn't clicking for me. Most of the people that are coming to my hubs are bouncing, my bounce rate is 78%. Can you look at just 1...
by Benji Mester 9 years ago
So I've been doing pretty much nonstop research on Panda and how to thrive in the midst of it, and I thought I'd share some interesting info I learned that might help others.1) Panda isn't actually a part of the Google algorithm. It's released periodically, to ravage the landscape as it were,...
by Benji Mester 10 years ago
I noticed that one of the Hubmetrics numbers on hubs is view duration. It tells you how long people stay glued to each of your hubs before clicking away for something else. I know that Google measures view duration as well. Do you think that pages that get viewed longer are...
by Carolee Samuda 6 years ago
I know there have been a lot of changes and I really appreciate that. I also am looking forward to the new hub layout...but...with disappointment.In any business, one must first make their assessment about what works and what doesn't. The things that don't work, you either fix them or get rid of...
by Bobri Dobri 6 years ago
Why do I get this strange google analytics results?I would appreciate any ideas and suggestions, because I have no idea what's wrong with my hubs.Let's take my best hub, Beautiful Russian names, for example. I have google analytics data for 8 days. It shows 147 pageviews total, while 74 are from...
by Sondra Rochelle 8 years ago
These show at the top of each article, but it would be nice to view them easily. This would give writers an idea as to how engaged readers are without having to check Google Analytics and would be much less tedious. With this feature, we would quickly know which hubs need to be upgraded.
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|