The related hubs feature found at the end of our hubs may very well be the reason why some of our articles are not ranking. It does nothing but stuff keywords on the page, which HP themselves suggest users not to do. So it is counterproductive to show so many "related hubs" with the exact same title as the post because it makes the page over-optimized.
For example, I have a hub titled How to Get Rid of Blackheads on Nose. The Related Hubs section features 8 hubs and all of them mention the phrase "get rid of blackheads." This means that if the page has 1000 words in total, the density of the phrase "get rid of blackheads" is already 3.6% -- and that's without even mentioning the phrase in the body of your hub!
Generally, a keyword density of more than 2% is already pushing it. And aside from the over-optimization issue, I wonder how useful this feature is. Think about it, would it benefit a user to be presented with "related hubs" with the same title as the post? 8 hubs about the exact same topic? I don't think so.
Right now, the only way to get around this is to write longer articles to push the keyword density down. Of course, this does not take into account building backlinks, social media marketing, "writing high quality content", etc. We are only talking about on-page optimization here.
- Limit the related hubs to 3 or 4 at most. (I would prefer an option to completely opt out of this feature, but it probably wouldn't happen.)
- Improve your algorithm to render more relevant and useful hubs for the readers.
I think all of us would like to see improvements in the Discover More Hubs section, both in terms of their number (eight is overkill) and how related they are (often they are completely unrelated, and a list of eight unrelated articles looks pretty strange). There are plenty of forum posts about it dating back more than a year.
But in your post I see a different problem. If you wrote a hub about removing blackheads and at the bottom there were eight hubs covering the same topic, it should tell you that blackhead removal is an over-saturated topic on HP and that your hub was never going to rank well anyway with so much on-site competition -- whether the blackheads are on the nose or elsewhere, whether your hub suggests conventional treatments or home remedies.
Google will only display one or two results from the same site for a given query that is not site-specific. But if you do the site-specific search
intitle:"get rid of blackheads" site:hubpages.com
in Google, you get 29 results. And that's just the hubs that are currently featured and available to search engines at the moment. There may be more on the site that are currently unfeatured, but that the authors may update to get re-featured.
So your problem with ranking may have much more to do with competition than with keyword density inflated by related hubs listings.
You digress from the topic. As I said, this is only about on-page optimization. Competition is a whole different matter. I am aware that the topics I write about in this account are saturated, but saying "your hub was never going to rank well anyway with so much on-site competition" just doesn't make sense. Why couldn't I make my hub "better" (at least in the eyes of Google) to make it rank better than the other hubs covering the same topic?
I research my competition for every hub I publish, though not as much in this account because I have two others that get way more views and earn me more bucks a month. It's only now that I consider tweaking my hubs here because I want to get them ranking once again, as they did a couple of years ago.
You make a good point about the Related Hubs section showing irrelevant posts. I forgot to mention that in my opening post. This just goes to show how flawed the algorithm is and that HP has done little, if at all, about this problem.
I agree that "related hubs" needs some serious tweaking. As does "related search."
One of my hubs uses the word "fat" just (I believe) one time in a 2-3000 or so word article. As in "the dictionary is a fat book." (It's a hub on unusual and interesting words.)
I also have as one of my words "leman." (Basically "beloved.")
So what do I see coming up as related? "Lose weight" and "Valentines Day." Really?
If the algorithm can't figure out what the main subject of a hub is -- and it should be kind of obvious, since I put it under the etymology section - then it's probably not helping very much and needs some rethinking.
by Eugene Brennan 14 months ago
I've had links to my own related hubs snipped on several occasions (mostly blatant lists at the end of a hub), but some links have been left in place after several snips. So is it acceptable to include a link to a hub which may be very relevant to the specific content in a section of a hub, if it...
by Marcy Goodfleisch 3 years ago
Do you have ideas on ways HP could improve the site or its usability in the coming year? No flaming, please; hoping to have some serious and helpful suggestions for staff to consider.Please share your ideas on: - How the site can improve Google rankings? - How the site can drive...
by Simone Haruko Smith 6 years ago
Last week, we announced on the HubPages blog that we are giving Hubs a makeover, and that the new Hub layout will be first tested in the Fashion and Beauty category.I am happy to say that the change is now live! Stop by some Fashion and Beauty Hubs to see it live.One thing you'll notice about this...
by Simone Haruko Smith 6 years ago
Hello everyone!Thanks so much for all the feedback you've provided regarding the new Hub design. We've taken it to heart and have rolled out two updates to the design:1. If you put your Hubs into a Group, the Hub featured in the top right sidebar will be the next Hub in that Group2. The footer will...
by Dolores Monet 2 years ago
Glancing at several of my hubs, I have seen way too many related hubs featuring pictures of people's rear ends. One of my hubs, about an historic area of Baltimore shows 2 pictures of posteriors. The hubs are about shaving one's butt the other about cysts. Not only are the hubs totally unrelated,...
by Peg Cole 4 years ago
In light of the recent barrage of "alleged" copyright violations from sites that use my content without my permission, I'm wondering why one particular hubber has visited one of my hubs over 600 times. I'm flattered by the attention, although, I do not see any comments from this person....
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|