Stick To The Facts Jack: Question On Proper Hub Length

Jump to Last Post 1-9 of 9 discussions (11 posts)
  1. Jesse Drzal profile image95
    Jesse Drzalposted 3 years ago

    It seems some of my newer hubs are going to level out somewhere between the 950 to 1000 word count. I am I hurting my odds for gaining future traffic because of the 1250 recommended word count? I just feel on a few of them I reached the point I want to convey, without filler personal opinions, stories etc and sticking with straight info. Do articles receive more traffic via these word counts only? Thanks, everyone and I hope you all have a great New Years!

    1. profile image0
      calculus-geometryposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      If you are writing on something that you have expertise in it should be no trouble to make about 900 words without resorting to filler.

      What affects traffic more is choice of topic.  Topics that the web is already saturated with just aren't going to succeed as hubs no matter how long they are, unless you write a 20,000 word Wikipedia-like article.

      When you have an idea for a hub, Google the topic (and its alternative wordings) to see how many other pages come up as exact or close matches.  It will help you form realistic traffic expectations, but you don't have to let it discourage you from writing about a topic you really care about.

  2. psycheskinner profile image84
    psycheskinnerposted 3 years ago

    I have hubs with less than 300 words that do just fine (featured, getting traffic).

    Longer hubs offer more content and more chances to hook and hold a reader.  But some topics suit a shorter treatment.  Length per se is not the most important thing to consider.

  3. Marisa Wright profile image97
    Marisa Wrightposted 3 years ago

    The 1250 length isn't a magic number, it's just a guideline.

    Years ago, one of our top Hubbers did some research and she found that her Hubs did best when they were between 800 and 1,500 words.  So that's what I always aim for.

  4. Jesse Drzal profile image95
    Jesse Drzalposted 3 years ago

    I am thinking more along the lines of search engine priority, as in does an article have a higher standing and priority simply on a higher word count, and not based on content. For instance, an author has possibly 600-1000 words of real content but stuff in hundreds of words of filler and fluff for high word counts, or does the shorter, more concise article have the same merit. Hope this makes sense. Thanks.

    1. Marisa Wright profile image97
      Marisa Wrightposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Yes it does make sense, good question.

      Most of Google's assessment is automated, not human.  Machines are obviously limited in how well they can judge quality and relevance:  but they can check spelling and grammar easily, and they can judge relevance by looking at how often relevant words (referred to as "keywords") are used in the text. 

      We've known about keywords for a long time, and at one point that led to people "keyword-stuffing" - cramming as many keywords as possible into every article to impress Google, often at the expense of good readable English!   So now Google also checks whether there are too many keywords relative to the length of the article - and if there are, Google will discard the article from its results. 

      And this is where the longer article length comes in.  A long article allows you to include lots of  relevant keywords without "keyword-stuffing", which will impress Google and result in the article being ranked higher. 

      You might conclude from that, that the longer the better - but remember you are also considering your reader.  You want Google to rank your article well so the reader finds it - but once the reader arrives, it's up to you to KEEP that reader interested!  So you don't want to add waffle or padding - and research has shown that most online readers will stop reading before the 1,500 word mark, so it's good to try to keep your text under that limit.

  5. Jesse Drzal profile image95
    Jesse Drzalposted 3 years ago

    You must have replied as I was typing Marisa lol. I'm just not going to worry about it. Thanks for explaining too.

  6. FatFreddysCat profile image98
    FatFreddysCatposted 3 years ago

    I usually shoot for at least 1100 words, which isn't hard to do because I tend to be a long winded S.O.B. big_smile

  7. Jesse Drzal profile image95
    Jesse Drzalposted 3 years ago

    Thank you all again for the great feedback everyone.

  8. NateB11 profile image91
    NateB11posted 3 years ago

    Just wanted to confirm what others have said, that I've also written articles with lower word counts (than the 1250 suggested length) and those shorter articles have gotten a lot of traffic. Much of it has to do with if the subject (specifically keywords) is in demand on the Net and if you are doing a better job answering the query than others have. Also, an article that gives the search engine enough to work with is good. Which means to a great extent you just have to be skillful as a writer and use a variety of words that the crawlers can use to index your article and know what it's about and then the search engine can use all that to present the article in search engine results pages for people who are looking for that particular subject matter.

  9. Jesse Drzal profile image95
    Jesse Drzalposted 3 years ago

    Thank you, Nate


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)