Defunct Websites

Jump to Last Post 1-16 of 16 discussions (41 posts)
  1. MomsTreasureChest profile image87
    MomsTreasureChestposted 7 years ago

    Webanswers, AskJeeves and Google Answers are just a few of my favorite websites that no longer exist, what are some some of your favorite or fun websites that are now gone?

    1. paradigmsearch profile image60
      paradigmsearchposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Bubble News (or whatever it name was) was quite an adventure. Total mess, but I do believe I got close to a $1000 from them before it all went to hell.

    2. NateB11 profile image85
      NateB11posted 7 years agoin reply to this

      I'm with PDS, Bubblews was great while it lasted. I made some money there and it was fun to write short pieces to say whatever I wanted. I didn't it treat it like a "writing" site, it was a way to blow off steam or throw out some thoughts that were running around in my head.

      1. profile image49
        Mills Pposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Bubblews had good membership, but suspect leadership, in my opinion. I was around Epinions for almost its entire active existence - and it was far more rewarding to me personally than Bubblews ever was. Epinions pieces of mine and others can still be read, but can no longer be rated or specifically critiqued. The rewards were far greater there than they ever were at Bubblews - at least in my experience with both sites.

        1. Marisa Wright profile image87
          Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

          Bubblews had zero chance of success, right from the very start.  Many of us were warning about that as soon as it launched.  We had seen that model before and knew exactly what would happen.

          Your posts were never actually earning anything.  Bubblews management was paying you, out of their own startup funds, for getting likes and views from other members.  They hoped that if the site got big enough, advertisers would pay big money to advertise on the site and they'd be able to make their money back and more.  Eventually they realised that would never happen, and they ran out of money, and that was that.

          Today.com did exactly the same thing.  Unlike Bubblews, though, they were then able to recoup their losses by selling their domain name to the Today program for a heap of money.

          1. NateB11 profile image85
            NateB11posted 7 years agoin reply to this

            Possibly the only statement I've read in the forums that actually describes exactly what happened with Bubblews. It was all really just a matter of them not being able to do what they set out to do.

            1. Marisa Wright profile image87
              Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

              The stupid thing is that if they'd known anything at all about writing sites, they'd have known that model had been tried and failed several times before them.

          2. ryanpugs profile image59
            ryanpugsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            I can remember warning people that bubblews was unsustainable too, the amount they were paying out per view Vs typical industry CPMs were miles apart. Still, a few people made a bit of money for a while and I'm sure it was a goldmine for those who made money whilst living in the third world.... $1000 is a hell of a lot of money in some parts of India.

            Felt a bit sorry for the founder when he was subsequently called a "scammer" though, harsh because it was clear that he'd just burnt through his investment / venture capital if he had any. Can be pretty sure he didn't walk away with any of the money, he'd given it all away. Still don't really understand what his business plan was to this day.

  2. Glenn Stok profile image66
    Glenn Stokposted 7 years ago

    Interesting that you brought this up. I wrote a hub about "The Demise of Writing Sites: Bubblews, Persona Paper and Niume"

    You can find it in my profile listing.

    1. Marisa Wright profile image87
      Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this
      1. Glenn Stok profile image66
        Glenn Stokposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Thank you for providing the link to my hub Marisa, since we're not supposed to link to our own hubs. I don't think paradigmsearch realized why I left it out.

        And thank you for your important addition in your comment you left there. Much appreciated.

    2. paradigmsearch profile image60
      paradigmsearchposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Likewise, good luck finding it.

  3. Wesman Todd Shaw profile image76
    Wesman Todd Shawposted 7 years ago

    InfoBarrel still exists, but it would be a complete waste of time to put any effort into anything there. It doesn't even matter if the page you create is awesome, it won't go anywhere. But I really did like the place when it was functional. I'm told they still pay out on time, but nobody is making much of anything there.

    Last I looked at it I was up to seventeen bucks. They paid me last, last December. I keep meaning to copy/paste everything I haven't already to blogger blogs. I don't care if they have duplicate content rules, their rules only mattered when their site mattered. I like my old content because I often had good ideas, but I only half assed them. These days I realize it is only ever useful to go all the way with whatever the topic may be.

    1. Glenn Stok profile image66
      Glenn Stokposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Ah! The infamous InfoBarrel. I have a hub about that too: "Is InfoBarrel Another Writing Site That's Doomed?"

      Sorry paradigmsearch, you're just going to have to scroll for that. smile

      1. Wesman Todd Shaw profile image76
        Wesman Todd Shawposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Totally doomed. They seem to have got their idea for it from here, but they didn't bother to evolve like this place did. Last I looked the two owner/admins showed up after being missing for months, to say that everything was fine, they'd fix the bugs, and the place was very much alive. But they're only going to do the bare minimum in maintenance. They just dropped that place and moved on to other internet projects.

        1. Marisa Wright profile image87
          Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

          I remember, a  year or two ago, getting a series of emails from Infobarrel about how they were launching a new concept in writing sites and inviting me to sign up for the Beta on Facebook.   I did, and got a lot of upbeat, jargon-filled emails promising amazing things were about to happen, any minute now (without ever actually saying what the new Infobarrel would DO).  Then it all stopped, just as suddenly.

          1. NateB11 profile image85
            NateB11posted 7 years agoin reply to this

            Had the same experience. I was reluctant to join that site in the first place and once I did join, I realized there was a reason to be reluctant. I eventually asked them to delete my account, which they did.

  4. paradigmsearch profile image60
    paradigmsearchposted 7 years ago

    Saw them/it, thanks. Throwing stuff against the wall on your own website works.

    1. Glenn Stok profile image66
      Glenn Stokposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Throwing stuff against the wall has its benefits, as long as you don't run into the wall yourself.

  5. Linda BookLady profile image85
    Linda BookLadyposted 7 years ago

    I used to write for a site called "Written By Me" back in about 2001 . . . that went down. Also, Squidoo..... and Gather. Remember Gather?

    Edited to add: JournalSpace ... at one time a nice site that was sold off and became a spam trap.

  6. MomsTreasureChest profile image87
    MomsTreasureChestposted 7 years ago

    I really liked Bubblews too, I think there was a 400 character minimum and you could add pictures.  It was fun to write about a variety of things with short and sweet pieces.  At first I didn't think we'd get paid, it seemed too good to be true, but sure enough we did,  It was fun while it lasted!

  7. theraggededge profile image83
    theraggededgeposted 7 years ago

    AltaVista sad

  8. Coffeequeeen profile image84
    Coffeequeeenposted 7 years ago

    Yes, I also wrote on Bubblews for a few months.  Shame that went down the pan as I liked writing on there.  Got a couple of payouts too.

  9. fer-nie profile image76
    fer-nieposted 7 years ago

    I used to like Yahoo Answers, actually. Then again, I've never been exposed to anything else in the past.

    1. ryanpugs profile image59
      ryanpugsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Doesn't that still exist?

  10. ChadCrouch profile image53
    ChadCrouchposted 7 years ago

    Quora is definitely one of my favorites but it ain't gone though.

  11. Solaras profile image82
    Solarasposted 7 years ago

    Interesting that no one has mentioned Squidoo here.  Have they all moved on to their own personal blogs and websites?

  12. paperfacets profile image90
    paperfacetsposted 7 years ago

    Squidoo. The pages earned some money, after it was sold, the pages earned zero money in two months.
    I have two websites now, moved articles to another platform, and now after a few years I am earning $ here on HPs. My work pace is very slow, though.

  13. Rupert Taylor profile image79
    Rupert Taylorposted 7 years ago

    Suite 101 had several incarnations but it wasn't selective enough about what it published, even though it had a decent staff. It shrank and shrank until it was just one guy running the thing out of his garage. He made extravagant promises about relaunches that were going to blow our socks off. Never happened.

    1. Marisa Wright profile image87
      Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Suite101 and Squidoo both had the same problem - they were generalist sites (i.e. containing articles on miscellaneous different topics).  That model was doomed to failure from the moment the first Panda update was launched by Google back in 2011.  At the time, Google declared war on "content farms" and their definition was broad:  there was a famous interview when Matt Cutts talked about Google's desire to wipe out content farms.  When the journalist pointed out that better-quality sites like HubPages had also been affected, Cutts' response was something like, "Yes, I'd expect that."

      Look back and you'll see that almost every generalist site has failed since then, for that reason - Google is out to get them. Those that have survived - except HubPages - are one-man-bands which limp along, offering their members little or no income.  I think HubPages' survival has more to do with its founder's determination than anything else!   For a long time, I was sure he would eventually throw in the towel - but now that HubPages has the niche sites, I'm hopeful - they are specialist, not generalist, and that's what Google wants.

      1. ryanpugs profile image59
        ryanpugsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        I can remember when panda was first rolled out Suite101 was muted as literally the biggest casualty on the 'loser lists' on numerous big SEO sites who analyse rankings. I can't actually remember what the site even looked like.

        Weird how hubpages is the last man standing and seemingly doing OK, when so many have been and gone. Bukisa, Mahola (sic?), Seekyt are a few others I remember.

  14. MomsTreasureChest profile image87
    MomsTreasureChestposted 7 years ago

    ChaCha was a another website where you could make money online answering questions, and I did for a little while. The ChaCha website answered questions through independent contractors called Guides. Guides were paid $0.02 per answer. The site shut down in November 2016 and it's said that the owner moved to Hawaii, refusing to pay the Guides the money they were owed. ChaCha's name came from the Mandarin Chinese words cha cha which loosely translated means to search, look, investigate.

    1. Marisa Wright profile image87
      Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      It's very, very likely there was no money.   Any site that promises to pay a fixed amount to writers is almost certainly paying out more than they're earning.  Usually they do it deliberately, believing that ultimately, when the site is successful, they'll make their money back.  But in most cases, they run out of money long before they get to that point.

  15. cleoaddams profile image82
    cleoaddamsposted 7 years ago

    Does the "old" Myspace count. I miss the old layout of the site, where you could customize your profile with gifs and stuff. Myspace is still going these days, but it's far from what it once was.

    1. ryanpugs profile image59
      ryanpugsposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Myspace is having a renaissance, but only on Thursdays.

      On twitter / instagram / facebook there is a thing called "throwback thursday", and what do people do?.... they hunt down their own social media profiles on places like myspace to find a photo to share on throwback thursday!

  16. FatFreddysCat profile image59
    FatFreddysCatposted 7 years ago

    Not writing related sites, but damn I miss GoHastings and CDNow.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)