If any of you out there are politically active in your home areas, this is something you might want to explore.
My husband and I are involved with a couple facing an eminent domain action to take their property for public use. However, the given reasons are specious, at best, and outright lies at worst. There are other very nearby areas that would serve their stated purpose as well or better, as the land is already clear, and would not require demolition of buildings.
The part that is so galling is this: as the law on the matter now reads, there is no winning this battle. You can hire an attorney (and they have--one who specializes in eminent domain law), but in the end, this has an effect only on the amount of money you can get as compensation for the property.
The only way around this, and to get the agency to back down is by a massive public outcry, and (this is our angle we think we can win) showing illegal procedure in the matter.
If you reject the offer of the agency putting forth the action, (in this case, the city), it doesn't matter. They can still give you 90 days notice to vacate, and come in and take your land and property anyway.
THIS IS JUST PLAIN WRONG AND CRUEL!!
In the end, there is no getting around the fact that eminent domain is theft, plain and simple. No matter how they want to dress it up with fancy legalese, it is still theft! Because anyone who has been on earth for longer than a year or few, knows darned will that the 'fair market value' the property owners are offered, is anything but! It in no way allows them to obtain any other comparable property!
This is a very bad law, and one that needs to be changed!! Who's willing to write/call/buttonhole your representatives about this??
Eminent domain always creates this reaction. It is also usually futile to fight. The only successful eminent domain fights I've witnessed, and I haven't witnessed many, was from a man who was able to outspend the local governance in defense while at the same time making his story VERY public to put pressure on thie governance to back down.
During the final meeting on the subject, where the local governance announced they would stop the process on this man's property, the elected official stated she was VERY unhappy that this man was able to keep his property where someone less rich would have lost it due to not being able to cause the government extreme costs via legal delays.
The video of this final meeting is on youtube, what do you think? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux40N4cETeQ
by SparklingJewel 2 years ago
I picked this up from an online source...is it true???February 26, 2009FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS!Beijing, China -- Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China have just CONFIRMED to me that the United States of America has tendered to China a written...
by Readmikenow 5 weeks ago
It appears the cost of building a border wall will pay for itself with the savings associated with having fewer illegal immigrants. “The findings of this analysis show that if a border wall stopped a small fraction of the illegal immigrants who are expected to come in the next decade, the...
by weholdthesetruths 7 years ago
For a vote in Congress, to confiscate the property of any specific group of people?
by Beata Stasak 6 years ago
Do you believe that what is legal is also always just and right?Watching 'William Kunstler;Disturbing Universe' about one of the most infamous lawyers of the twentieth century, who fought for civil rights with Martin Luther King Jr. and represented the famed 'Chicago 8' activists, inmates in Attica...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|