For a long time it has puzzled me how one of my hubs keeps doing great, when it shouldn't. You see, I started a hub on one topic and then changed my mind in the middle of it.
Now, back then I had no idea you couldn't change the URL later, so I was horrified when I was stuck with a URL that couldn't be changed and had nothing to do with my article ... but I left it as is, vowing I would some day find out how to fix it ... lucky for me ... that day never came.
The hub I speak of went on to be a great performer, but it broke the rule where the URL must have the keyword in it. Trust me ... it does not ... but the title does.
So, what does this have to do with today? Read on!
I was checking my hubs and I found on some when I did an exact search I received a description and on others I received all of my tags. Now, no one is going to click on a bunch of tags ... and sure enough ... the ones that came up as tags were my worst performers.
What caused some descriptions to show up right and others to show up wrong. Was Hubpages short circuiting my efforts? Was the Google Beast exacting revenge on me? As it turns out, the case was neither ... and what I just learned was worth a lot of gold ... which is why I will share.
You see, I was always told the URL had more weight than the title, and I believed it. I can now say 100% that that is a myth!
To prove my case, I looked up every hub of mine by keywords. Now, for some I had the keywords in the title and for every one of those the description appeared fine. For those that only had the keywords in the URL the URL was nothing but tags.
So what does that prove? Read on!
Now, for those hubs that had the keywords in the title AND in the URL, I had a description. What does this mean? Tada! The title has more weight! That's why my article for the wrong URL was still doing well, because I used the keywords in the title - it also explains why some articles were doing poorly, as I did not use the keywords in the title.
Of course, it's best to use your keywords in your title AND in your URL, and I now know this to be true ... I just changed the title on some to make them more interesting, and in doing so, shot myself in the foot.
So, now you know the secret ... always place your keywords in your title AND your URL - and if you have a URL that is wrong and can't be changed, at least place the keywords in your title.
SEOs have been emphasizing this point for years now. Good for you that you have realized it.
Thanks, that was nice of you to share. I feel like I am going to Hub College. It is great.
thanks so much YOSHI97 for this information, I always doesnt care before if they are a lot the same my URL and title now I know, hmmmm, you make my weekend good now because I have lots of articles in which the title captures the article but the URL doesnt, so at least it might still be ok...
So, you have just re-invented the wheel. Congrats!
You should have noticed long ago from SERPs that some of the pages on the first page don't even have the keywords on their URLs, only on their titles.
Strange though you are right, because the title is what the search engine look for, this is my title: Photography was becoming very addictive. So I ended up with rehab ads and now my hub is flagged
http://hubpages.com/hub/Photography-was … -addictive
Here's another http://hubpages.com/hub/Had-I-captured-the-fears
What's wrong with these titles?
ty yoshi, very informative, I had no idea, it is true, you learn something new every day...
Well, yes, that is good advice in general. You should always have the keywords you want in your title.
You should have it in both the title and URL, but having the keyword in the URL is a very heavy bonus compared to title in my experience!
Thanks for sharing your experience.
My experience shows me the title is more important than anything. It is always a huge plus if you use the main keywords in the URL. But be very careful about keeping your url's short. You might have 6-7 words in your title, try to trim the URL into 2-4 words with the main keywords. It really helps.
Should be in both, but the URL is weighed more heavily than the title.
Particularly when taking in account ALL of the search engines, yahoo loves keyword rich urls
I have close to a hundred domains that if i was willing to share, I could use as evidence...glad to see your traffic rise, but there is no doubt that the URL keyword takes precedence over a title keyword
No, I use cheesy keyword rich titles and URL's
So there is little to no difference between my titles and my URL's
It leads to higher rankings in the SE, Yoshi was right when he wanted to change his titles to be more "clickable" ...but its better to rank and hope your summary draws the search traffic
What i was referencing in a general not hubs specific example is that I buy domains frequently, if a keyword performs moderately well as a hubpage, than i just go ahead and buy the domain.
I cant develop so many domains, so i make quick landing pages, all ads , with one or two crappy articles...they sit like that until I find time to make a real site
Within 60 days those sites are usually first page in yahoo and google..the point? they dont have any title text!
there is a distinction...
the search engines like the keywords before the / /
the farther away they are, the less important they are
So, I would GUESS that here on hubpages the title is very important ...but in general SEO, its common knowledge that the URL keyword is key and king
So yoshis post is helpful!!!!! make sure those keywords are in the title and in the H2 (text capsule header)...its important
Im just disagreeing that the title takes precedence over the URL
...should be in both! might be that the title weighs a bit heavier here than normal since our keywords are so deep in the URL..but still doesnt outweigh the URL ..in my experience
about 3 months ago, i used the keyword tool to change all my titles and my major headers... i also stuffed a few terms around until I liked what ads appeared in my hubs
..my hub traffic went up 200% in a couple of weeks,and my earnings went up 500%...this didnt happen because my new titles were weighed heavier than my URL, it happened because i did better research.
Now all my new hubs have better researched titles and URL's from teh beginning...but if a hub is failing, its better to change the title keywords than worry about a a title/url agreement
does that make any sense? Ive been at the computer a little to long today
Thanks Sunforged! That definitely helps explain the anomaly, as I was always taught the URL was most important and it always worked that way for me until I came here.
I think you hit the nail on the head when you mentioned URL length. This would explain why my titles are overruling my URLs without invalidating anything I had learned in the past.
So, on Hubpages at least, title appears to trump URL in importance; HOWEVER, still use those keywords in the URL as I definitely agree that it should help with ranking.
Currently, I'm experimenting with a few hubs by using one high ranking keyword in the URL and a different high ranking keyword in the title ... not certain what to expect yet, so I'll have to keep a watch on my analytics to see if I can find a conclusive trend in the keyword hits data.
And while I might be a wise dragon ... we need to also remember that Sunforged is a wise human. As he SEOs off this site more than I do nowadays, one would be wise to lend more credence to what he says.
yes, this is helpful. my keywords are in my title, but I'll have to check placement. I haven't changed any of my URL's and some of them seem to be doing fine. they're right there on page 1 at the top even when I mix up the placement of words to search where they are. a few aren't though because they're such common search words, I guess. still learning so much and I hear different things from different people, even my oldest son who spends all day on the computer and knows all this stuff.
thanks for taking the time to explain.
Yoshi, thank you xo I was actually just having difficulty with this subject and ta da Yoshi fixed it - thank you
Thanks for the advice, one fellow hubber told me of rearranging all of his hubs that didnt have "correct" urls. If only he read this first!
O.O Dang it. I always put keywords in the title and url so it doesn't really help me much.
The most important on page factor for ranking is well known to be the title tag.
The most important off page factor for ranking (and the most important overall) is the inbound link and the anchor text in those links. (If you don't think it's important, Google "click here" and you will see the top result is Adobe Reader, even though the words "click here" aren't on the page, the title tag, or the URL, because literally millions of sites point to it with the anchor text "click here")
On hubpages, both those important ranking factors are controlled by the title, since that sets both the title tag of the page and the anchor text for every automatically generated inbound link from hubpages. With smart tagging and a popular category this can add up to thousands of links, all with the anchor text that you choose.
Bottom line, on hubpages in particular, the title tag is the single most important thing you can do on the page to help rank. The URL is a nonfactor compared to the inbound linking.
ah ... you speak of the Hubpages interlocking web that links articles together over time. I have watched this spindly beast and I do believe it's responsible from upping the ranking of articles over time.
I already have a PR3 article in my short time here, and I have several more headed that way. I thoroughly believe Hubpages interlocking between hubs helps a lot with the organic page rankings and that this (like you said) furthers the importance of page titles on Hubpages.
I also played around with tags during my time here, but as far as I can tell they have had no effect, other than to allow other hubbers to find my pages. To that end, I try to come up with tags that are extremely relevant to the material I wrote about - and I think they may also help with getting the right ads on the page from adsense, but the jury is still out on that one.
The difficulty of applying common SEO rules to Hupbages is that most SEO knowledge infers that *you* own the domain and are directly in control of it. With Hubpages this is not the case, which is why some of the variables are out of your control. As such, we find ourselves scrambling to find the things that are still within our grasp and working them to meet our goal.
A good example is the adsense ads themselves ... How many of us have went to the Adsense page and tried to switch the types of ads we have on our Hubpages?
I remember changing the color, the type, and everything and then waiting a day to see the new and improved ads ... they never came. Instead, I have learned to write my articles a certain way to write around the limitations of the ad placement, so as to use their placement to the best of my ability. And with over half of my hubs generating over a 6% click-thru rate I seem to have that part just about down - with the other half of the hubs being hubs for the hubbers, fluff articles for the fun of it, or the few that never received an audience (due to poor title choice, I have found).
Tags can be your friend on hubpages. Here's a hub I wrote on how to use tags
As far as trying to optimise adsense placements and colors, that's what the YieldBuild they use to place the ads is supposed to do, and I remember some time back where they were placing all sorts of wild colored Adsense blocks but eventually settled down into what we have today. You can of course help by breaking up your text blocks to allow a spot for the ads to be placed.
As far as SEOing hubpages, you do have control over the most important factors, title tag, hub content, inbound link anchor text, and of course you can do all the inbound linking you want. Beyond that you are talking about site structure and PR distribution, which is why Hubpages is not really appropriate to try ranking for really competitive terms.
But Hubpages does a much better job that say Squidoo for building links to related hubs and such, so that it's not unusual for a good hub to see a lot of internal backlinks. And that's how you get your high PR pages.
This was great info. I will perform a test on a few of my least performing hubs and see what the results are. Thanks.
Just wanted to reinforce what sunforged said here since one of my partners has just reached the number one spot on google for a decently competitive product search term. His site is ahead of amazon and other large shopping site results for his phrase. Unfortunately I can't tell you the phrase, but his URL is the keywords he is ranking for...that's it. He has some backlinks as well, but the domain is fairly new and beating out some big competition...at least for now.
by Dorsi Diaz 9 years ago
When I first started writing at HubPages I was under the impression that one should make the url and the first title of their hub the same.So my question now is: When trying to write the url for maximum traffic, how much should you really deviate on the main title? Or does it even matter if the key...
by BennyTheWriter 8 years ago
Is there any value in linking to your own hubs within OTHER hubs and your profile page, in terms of search engine page ranking? Any advantage at all? I've seen a lot of people do this.If this is a silly question, please forgive me; I'm still relatively new here. Thanks.
by DellNixon 6 years ago
What is a backlink and how can I check how many backlinks my hub or website have?
by TahoeDoc 6 years ago
SEO experts....How important is it that URL matches title keywords?I titled a hub, partially typed and saved it. Then I decided a different title would be more appropriate and changed it. I just realized the URL (in the address bar in the search engine) keeps the original title. So my URL does not...
by Brian 9 years ago
I am kind of tired of this whole traffic thing. Everyone else claims great success, and I can't get a view. I have only 2 views today, and 23 views for the whole week.I have tried everything to get traffic, and nothing is working for me. I even joined several social sites, and my traffic has only...
by ptosis 5 years ago
I found this graph huge in original size @ http://crunchydata.com/content-sites.htmHubpages is #5 and is recommended to write for when published in Feb 2010 almost four years ago. Does anybody have any newer comparisons of revenue sharing quality that has quality writing?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|