I have a Hub that is now ready for niche submission. I hope it passes and is accepted. But I am wondering which niche is the best gamble to take? Should it go the Owlcation editor or the ReelRunDown editor? I would like the best bet because I have a different Hub I want to submit in my 2 week window.
https://hubpages.com/literature/book-and-film-gift
I would pick ReelRunDown. But don't worry too much about it. If by chance you submit to a wrong niche site the team moves it to the website it belongs once accepted.
Thanks for the suggestion. I have found that the Team does not have the across niche referral system working site wide. That is why I am thinking this is a bet on my part and I do worry about it. I had to submit a Hub twice to get it in a ncihe site. It was a toss up. Should I submit to Toughnickel or to FeltMagnet? So, I think the system is not embraced by all the editors even though, it is a whole site policy.
The last submission I thought could go into FeltMagnet or WeGotKids. but there was no indication that both niches had a look at it.
Someone from the staff would be able to give you a better answer. But I would say if you submit it to Owlcation, the editors are Owlcation are going to say nope this does not belong to us and they move it to RellRunDown and an editor there would look into it and approve it if it meets the guidelines. If not, it's rejected and you can work on it again, etc.
I assume that you worked on something before submitting again? If yes, that small change was the reason it was accepted the second time around. The team makes notes on the reasons the hub is rejected from a niche site. I always wished they shared those notes with the authors to make everyone's life easy.
Oh yes, I make changes. My Hubs are not written on stone. There is a hundred ways to say the cat does not like water, so to speak.
Lobobrandon is right, wherever you submit it, if the editors think it would do better on a different niche site they just move it there instead.
Unless you've had a lot of sales off it you might experiment with taking the Amazon capsule off because those aren't as welcome by the editors as they used to be.
I believe that is not my experince like I mentioned above.
Also, I don't know if each site has it's own editors. I think the team of editors all work together on all of the niche sites. I could be wrong, it's just what I've noticed with my own submissions.
Interesting. I always thought the editors specialised in a few niche sites (considering the number of editors was lower than the number of niche sites). Also, the queue for Owlcation was always longer, if the tasks were shared, the time for an article to be accepted to every niche site would probably be similar.
This has been my experience. The editor I was recently talking with only deals with Letterpile content and had to contact an Owlcation editor to answer some of my questions.
I've only dealt with one editor when I submit to Delishably, but I honestly doubt she's the only editor for that niche.
I've been in contact with 4 different editors and they do not seem to know much about the editing/accepting policies of the other niche sites. However, they can contact other editors and I have had editors move different articles to other niche sites.
Okie I've never had the cross niche question session. Hehe
She'sabutterfly, I did get one email from an editor that indicated they referred the Hub to another niche, but I did not get that kind of consideration with another Hub. That Hub actually was accepted on another niche after I did some edits, but the process did take a few months of waiting. The email said after 60 days I could resubmit. So if editors are doing communications between themselves it does move Hubs faster into the earning side of HP. If they don't...well. It is not a very tight process.
That's true. I submitted an article 3 or 4 times before an editor decided it should be on a different niche and transferred it to their editors. Kind of a waste of my time as I don't think it belongs there but nothing I can do about it at this point.
It would be a lot easier if it was the standard. Would save us writers some time and give us some certainties on what needs to be done to get the articles moved to niche sites.
That happened to me. I submitted to one niche and it was moved over to another. After a bit. I figured it out, submitted one-for-one, you will, too.
Lobobrandon - I could be totally wrong! I don't know for sure, it was just my guess.
by Christy Kirwan 8 years ago
Hi Hubbers,Check out the HubPages Blog when you get a chance to read about our two new features. Feel free to post here if you have any questions or if anything isn't clear.
by Nathan Bernardo 4 years ago
I understand there's no reason to submit new articles to niche sites because staff get to those first, but I'm debating whether to go through my old articles to submit them. Is this something anyone here does with success?
by Cholee Clay 7 years ago
I have an article that an editor has made substantial changes too. Including adding a bio that they wrote themselves. I have not seen an edit this bad in quite some time on one of my articles, and I do not want to go through the whole article and rewrite half of it. I've already spent countless...
by David Patrick 7 years ago
I've written several 1000-1300 hubs and they have the featured status, but none have been transferred to a niche site yet. I'm glad that HP has implemented changes for search engine optimization, but sometimes it's unfortunate because I know I am losing potential views and earnings. 7 years ago I...
by Nell Rose 4 years ago
I was just checking one of my articles which I always earned from, and found that it didn't have any adverts on it! As it hasn't been put on another site does this mean that it won't have adverts?
by Nell Rose 6 years ago
I am pretty insulted. Sorry, but it had to be said. I had written an article on here that had done really well. In fact, it was one of my top earners. I went to answer a comment on it, and I stared at it for at least five minutes. I no longer recognised it! The photos had been changed, the writing...
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |