Improving my article and getting it Featured

1. 60

   Erudite Scholarposted 6 years ago

   Hi hubbers,
   I would like feedback on my article.Kindly help me to get  Featured
   https://hubpages.com/religion-philosoph … ip-the-Dev

   replyreport
   1. 74

      TIMETRAVELER2posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      If it's not featured, we can't see it.  However, you really should scroll through the learning center and find the section about what you need to have to create a stellar hub.  These are the things the team looks for.  Some include:  a good searchable title, contents that match your topic, good use of capsules, excellent use of spelling, grammar and structure.  There's more, but that will get you started.  You should always proofread your hub a few days after writing it. You'd be surprised at how many mistakes you'll find!

      replyreport
2. 61

   FatFreddysCatposted 6 years ago

   "404: Page Does Not Exist."
   
   Sorry, I tried. (shrugs)

   replyreport
3. 60

   Erudite Scholarposted 6 years ago

   @FatFreddyscat Am sorry, here is the link again
   https://hubpages.com/religion-philosoph … -the-Devil

   replyreport
4. 72

   theraggededgeposted 6 years ago

   I would say that you haven't included enough evidence in your article for anyone to draw a conclusion It's a little thin on content.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Erudite Scholarposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Hi @RE I will definitely add more evidence and proof to support the claims.

      replyreport
      1. 72

         theraggededgeposted 6 years agoin reply to this

         Not only that, but you'll have to prove the existence of the Devil.
         
         Good luck!

         replyreport
         1. 60

            Erudite Scholarposted 6 years agoin reply to this

            Hi @theraggededge,
            Ok, here is the proof : In the absence of that which is not, that which is, is not.Following this logic, i conclude that if God really exists, then Satan exists.Are you satisfied now?

            replyreport
            1. 72

               theraggededgeposted 6 years agoin reply to this

               Well, that's your conclusion; it's not proof As no-one has satisfactorily proved the existence of God, that leaves it all hanging somewhat Anyway, it's not me who needs convincing, it's your readers. Satanism is a fairly modern construct and many Satanists don't actually believe he exists themselves. They just like the idea of riling up the Christians.
               
               Also one of the basic tenets of communism is that supporters are atheist.  If that is so, it's not possible for them to believe in the Devil. This is an argument you should address in your article. It's always good to present all sides of a discussion.
               
               Edit, so I did a little digging and the only evidence that Marx was a Satanist can be traced back to a book by someone called Wurmbrand who had no definitive proof whatsoever. The title of his book was formated as a question in order to by-pass the need to provide actual evidence.
               
               Looking at the conclusion of your article, it seems that you have decided that Marx was a Satanist even though you have no actual proof. You can't use poetry and quotes as concrete examples.
               
               I'm not saying you shouldn't write it, just that you could make it more well-rounded by asking hard questions of the premise. It could be fascinating.
               
               Good luck.

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  Erudite Scholarposted 6 years agoin reply to this

                  Ok, thanks.I will look into it.

                  replyreport
5. 66

   psycheskinnerposted 6 years ago

   It's a bit confusing.  Because communism is (?) atheist and so Marx presumably does not believe in God, despite being a declared Christian, he worships one of Gods fallen angels?

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Erudite Scholarposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      @Psycheskinner, Marx was a Christian before he discovered the occult.

      replyreport