They simply put a pretty picture up and then read your article verbatim out loud.
Google then ranks the YouTube link above your article link.
There's no way to fight this. I give up. I'm done.
Yes, there is a way to fight this. One of my newest articles became the featured snippet right after I published it so it was copied on Youtube and read out with a computer voice. (The video has almost 1000 views when I was still under 100.) I filed a complaint with Google and they took it down immediately, replacing the video with my name, as Bev points out.
The thief also was given the ability to contact me, so he sent me a "woe is me" letter telling me how his family would starve if I removed all of my content from his site.
Not a perfect solution for me, but definitely a way to fight this.
I've gone through the same thing. Like DrMark, I contacted Google about it, and they took the video down immediately.
It's easy to find if you simply do a search on your article title or key phrases. You might want to schedule a regular check for video theft every few months, at least for your most popular Hubs.
The week after the article was moved to a niche site I checked Google to see if it still had the featured snippet. As PDS pointed out, the video (with some computer voice reading my article) was ranked above my hub.
When I went onto the theifs Youtube page I found all sorts of my aritlces copied. I filed DCMAs for them all. (I think there were about a dozen.) Google removed them but put a notice in each one stating that it had been removed at my request. Google also sent my email address to the thief.
As YouTube is owned by Google, it's easy to have it taken down. The trouble is, they plaster your real name on the page that previously displayed the video. When queried, they told me 'that's the way we do it'.
Thank you, everyone! I had thought the thieves had found a way to beat the system and all was lost.
Since Google wants to make this up close and personal with real names and email addresses; I'm contemplating sending collection agencies after them (the individual thieves) for usage fees, instead of just doing the usual DMCAs. Good idea? Bad idea?
Well, if the person is in Russia or China, I do not think it would do much good. It might give them something to laugh about over the dinner table though.
I guess if you just want to bring a bit of laughter to someones day it is a good idea.
I think most of the thieves are in the US (same as with the hackers, btw). Collection agency does all the work, split the proceeds 50:50?
Edit: I understand photographers do this all the time.
Not sure about hackers, but I seriously doubt that most of the spammers and content thieves are in the US. In some countries the wages are less than a dollar a day but they do have internet access.
What criminal would not take advantage of someone like that?
WOW I never thought youtube users would steal your articles too. The first hub I searched for was a hit. All my own photos with text from my article displayed on them. It was posted on November 2 and only had 3 views. Now I have to figure out how to file a DMCA.
I just discovered a new phrase:
"copyright infringement debt buyer"
This beats the debt collector route I think.
The problem is actually finding one that is willing to bother with such small potatoes as my situation.
Well, it is really good that you discussed such a query on this platform. I had zero knowledge about this youtube theft thing. So good to read all the comments and got the information about it.
I found mine on this youtube channel user/eddiegreen11/videos I left the https www youtube dot com out in order to not make a working link
Everybody who writes about dogs and cats should take a look, I haven't counted them but there are several hundreds of videos there, mostly German, but other languages too.
So far I have found two of my hubs. He displays all photos multiple times and put text from the article over them.
Jeez! I had know idea of this YouTube form of theft. I'm with you, paradigm, just makes you wanna holla! Thanks for the info guys.
I've figured out the secret to success.
I just got to write something that is god enough to get onto a niche site, but not good enough to steal. What could be easier?
People are completely pathetic and shameless. I had no idea about YouTube, thank you so much for informing us.
YouTube is fast as it comes to copyright infringement. I filed two DMCAs yesterday and today I got two emails from YouTube Copyright telling me they removed both videos. Now when I click the link to one of them it shows a black square with the text:
"canine degenerative myel...." is no longer available due to copyright claim by Titia Geertman.
Same goes for the other one.
I can't imagine anybody wanting to hear my hubs read by a computer. Are these things actually successful?
They get the views because they rank for the same terms. When looking for stuff, I've come across such videos myself (not sure if they were copied from articles, but a computer reading something out). There's this first ad that shows up sometimes, so even if you close it as soon as you realize it's all c**p, you've already listened to an ad giving that person some ad revenue. Also,I doubt they'd be doing it if it doesn't pay at least some pennies.
One of mine that had been copied and read on Youtube had 10 times the views my article did. Since Google ranked it at the top of the page, above my article, I guess I should not have been too surprised.
Fighting the thieves off all the time, and certain other obstacles/obstructions, has just plain worn me down. The last two sentences in my OP just may end up being true.
Don't give up. Thanks to your post I found two of my PetHelpful articles on youtube on this channel: https:// www. youtube.com/ user/eddiegreen11/featured I filed two DMCAs and YouTube closed both videos within one day. Next day I got an email from YouTube saying that some person had a complain about the shutdown and the name was from someone in Ha Noi. Then I got a personal email form this person saying:
From: Laza Channel [mailto:yameng.wang88 @ gmail.com]
Verzonden: November 15, 2018 16:07
To: my email address
Subject: Copyright Youtube
This video is self-made by me, please do not receive copyright that is damaging my channel"
So I replied to the given email address saying that the info he used on those videos were copyrighted and that if he didn't take them down I would sue him.
Next day I got another email from him saying:
I'm sorry. I do not understand why you put the copyright stick on my videos. Please retract the copyright stick I will remove all the videos you requested. thank you!
And now both videos are no longer there. So it does help to send emails and file DMCAs.
Maybe a good thing that anyone on PetHelpful check out this channel. I was able to find my articles by typing in the full titles and I recognized the photos of my dog and cat.
edit: I just entered a title I found on PetHelpful : Veterinary advice on what to do if your dog eats gum by Hubber Adrienne Janet Farricelli and this article has been turned into a video also on this channel: https:// www. youtube.com/ watch?v=lZH_kwL4VPE (just remove the spaces.
I filed the DMCA with YouTube.
Am not happy about my name, physical address, phone number, email address, being given to a known thief!!!
For Image - Water mark your image stating 'Stolen from username @ Hub pages Network' or Copyright Your-User-Name@HubpagesNetwork.
But, for Text, I do not know what to do.
You can't watermark images used on HubPages.
If the image is created by somebody else (Taken from Google - Free to use) then we should not use water mark. Or if the water mark is applied by somebody else, then we should not use that.
When you are the owner of the Image (Mean you created it), you can use water mark (Even Copyright). Hope, some staff here can shed more light on this
No, you can't. Watermarked images are not permitted.
Here's the relevant section from the FAQ:
"Images that are low resolution, grainy, or pixelated detract from the aesthetic appeal of an article and are prohibited. For the same reason, images or videos that contain obtrusive watermarks are also prohibited. Watermarks can include URLs, logos, copyright notices, or other text rendered over the image. This rule applies even if they are your own photos or videos, or photos or videos that you have the legal right to use."
"This rule applies even if they are your own photos or videos"
- I got the Point. Thanks for clarifying.
I do used water-marks and the articles are featured.May be because of water mark transparency (5%) Original content is 95% Opaque. An Example is below
However, In future, I will avoid it.
by plusPlus 5 years ago
How to earn money using YouTube?My friend is saying that she only earns money through youtube. Is it really possible to earn money using youtube? If yes how?
by victor.hatley 7 years ago
Hello, while I'm not brand new to internet writing, I am new to this pub. I recently published an article series, on Gobekli Tepe, and one of my off-site readers suggested a video of the pics i couldn't get into the arts. The research I did for the article was deep and many of the pics had been...
by Ben Aidoo 3 years ago
Lately on Google Search you are likely to find at least two YouTube videos on most items searched for. I'm often tempted to click on the videos because in 5 minutes or less I get the information I need. Moreover, as we've all become multitask oriented, videos allow us to get the information we...
by Ronald E Franklin 2 years ago
I'm planning a hub about one particular actor in one particular scene of a movie. Without a visual representation of the actor in the scene the article would be meaningless, but no free or non-copyrighted photos appear to exist. To me this seems a classic case for Fair Use, as reflected in this...
by Pamela N Red 5 years ago
I discovered today that the German Wikipedia (Wikiversity) stole one of my articles so you may want to check and see if they have any of your work. The aggravating thing is that I have a Google Alert set up for that story but was never notified about this. I sent Wikiversity an email and received a...
by Persecution-ave 5 years ago
I just tried to publish my first article and it received a substandard ratings. I then got a form letter email that said absolutely nothing. In the email it referenced a website that I referenced but that's it. It's not a subversive site or anything, in fact its a website put up by the american...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|