So, yesterday, I got an email saying one of my articles had been edited: a recipe that's been posted since 2017. I'm not sure it really needed editing, since most of what was done was superficial. I checked it over, hated about half of the changes, and edited the article to correct some of the errors that had been inflicted.
Today, I got another email, saying the same article has been edited. Again. With different, ugly changes that weren't necessary, some of which undid what was done to the article by yesterday's editor. So, again, I edited the changes, undoing some of the ugly.
I have no doubt that this cycle of being edited, me correcting the edits, and having the article go back into the queue to be reviewed again, and edited again, could potentially go on forever. Please find a solution to this, because it's a waste of my time, and the time of the various editors who have their own ideas about how what I've written should be presented.
Nice to see you in the forums - sorry it is because you are frustrated. How are things going on your own site?
Very well, thanks. I have four sites now, two of which earn me income from advertising. I've just finished jumping through the latest round of suggestions from Google, which pretty much doubled my ad revenue.
Rather than going back and forth with edits/reverting edits, it is best to email the team (email@example.com) and let them know what is going on, as it is a waste of time for both parties.
Unfortunately, your articles are being edited as part of a "Google boost" (@theraggededge's term). And as @DrMark1961 mentioned, if you do not want your articles edited during this update, you can opt-out and have them moved back to HubPages.
The objective of this update is to keep articles current, and thus rank better with Google (which means more traffic)!
I replied to the second edit notice, asking that the article be left as it is now. One bad edit is fine. Two of them is just inexcusable.
The only fact that matters is whether an edit increases or decreases your rank and visits from search engines.
If they increase, the edit is good. If they decrease, the edit is bad.
I suggest giving an edit several weeks without messing with it to see if anything changes.
I disagree. In this case, it was a vegan recipe, edited by someone who is clearly not vegan themselves. The title of my article was changed to something I, and many other vegans, would find offensive.
I have some problems with this too, even where "evergreen" articles are being edited for minor issues.
It's to keep them fresh for the search engines. A recent edit date is always a positive thing. Be happy about it
Hi Lisa, I think it's happening to some of the network sites in order to give them a Google boost after an update. Your recipe was probably edited routinely and then got edited again as per the above. Not much we can do, apart from appreciating HP staff for doing their best to keep our hubs current
Lisa, there was a person complaining about this same issue here on the forums several months ago. (If I remember right she is working on a book and did not want to spend her time on edits/re-edits.) Anyway, I think one of the staff came on and told her that she could ask to have her articles moved back to HP main site, not on the niche sites. They would no longer be edited.
I am sure there would be traffic loss. No idea how much it would be in your case. I am not even sure if you want to go to that extreme, but thought I would tell you about her forum post.
Not sure if you're talking about me, but no member of staff told me I could move my stuff back to hubpages. I have never been told that.
I have also changed my articles back to the way they were (and updated them in the process), and editors have checked them and accepted them.
The thing that has upset me are the rewrites - not the edits. There is a difference between a rewrite and an edit.
In the rewrite, someone has actually changed the information, plus rewritten entire sentences and paragraphs. That's not an edit.
It has not happened often.
The other day, someone edited a piece before moving it to a niche site. They changed some of the wording in the title. It absolutely was the best improvement ever! I was very thankful for it.
No, I was not talking about you. The person to whom I am referring has articles about dog agility on Pethelpful.
Yes, I have had my research updated and my conclusions changed, in a medical article. I have laid down. That is all.
I still earn more here in spite of the decreasing earnings and lack of control. I can say that I would never use anything here as a writing sample of my work, because much is no longer my work.
I do appreciate the editorial corrections that clean up grammatical and AP errors. Rewrites...that is shocking without a collaborative process.
The team has been editing every one of my articles on Delishably over the past couple of weeks. I would characterize them as tweaks; some I agree with, some I don't. But I operate on the premise that the editors know more about how to attract traffic than I do, after all that's their job and I know diddly-squat about the mysteries of Google algorithms. I can't believe that HubPages makes changes to my articles in order to attract fewer readers.
I agree with you, Rupert. Thus far about 50 of my articles (maybe more like 100; I've lost count) on Delishably have undergone a tweek of some kind. I know that my traffic has doubled so unless or until they create something horrible I'll let the edits stand.
Those "tweaks" you mention sometimes can be disastrous. In my case, the editors added material that wasn't true and removed my photos and replaced them with photos of completely different plants that were not mentioned in the article. The problem is that the editors may know how to edit articles but they do not have in depth knowledge about the subject matter of the articles that they are working on.
My suggestions for Lisa is to email the editors and let them know why she is reverting their changes. It may be a case similar to mine where the changes are completely inappropriate and may even be untrue.
That's what I do when my articles get edited and I revert the edits. A quick email explaining why stops the whole the process.
I'm so sorry this is happening to you, Lisa. I've had a few blooper edits myself, but most of my articles are on HubPages. I let the team decide if something should be placed on a niche site.
In your place, I personally would have been furious and temporarily unpublished the article. I would have taken a couple of days to correct edits, maybe even up to four or five days.
If the bloopers recurred, I would have unpublished again and contacted the HubPages Team via email (I keep their email address in my contacts at Yahoo). Matthew, if he is still part of the team, seems to have the last say on an edit(s). They do make mistakes like us, so hang in there.
May you have every writing joy and success in 2020!
I have had dozens of articles edited even after they had been edited before. Some of the articles are ones I have written years ago. My pay has increased because of the edits. Some of them are really beautiful after the edits. I have had only one that was edited so much that I didn't recognize it as being my own. Pictures were changes, links were changed, etc. Someone went to great lengths to improve the article.
I am glad to know that other people's articles are being edited. I used to think my articles were edited as a special favor just for me (smile).
There is a notification in the e-mail to contact HP if we do not agree with the changes. By the way, there are two different notifications I have been getting. One is about minor edits and the other one is about an article been "snipped." Both ways provide the same results. So, I appreciate the effort on HP's part.
Concerning the snipped articles, HP writes the following: "We developed this type of edit to address articles that are already in really good shape, but that require some very easy-to-fix changes to either a) move to a Network Site, or b) remain on a Network Site. This type of edit hopefully saves authors’ time and reduces back and forth between writers and HubPages staff. Of course, you have the ability to reverse any change made to your article. However, if you add back problematic elements (links, products, etc.) your article has a very high chance of moving back to HubPages or becoming Defeatured. We will usually snip an article only once; after the first time, it is your responsibility to keep your article in compliance. If you have any questions, feel free to email us."
Hopefully, this post will help others appreciate what HP is doing and think of it as something that HELPS instead of something that HARMS!
Happy Holidays, and enjoy the blessing!
I am sorry about your frustration. I hope HP staff sees this thread because they need to know about this situation. We are a team and work well together, and letting them know what is happening should resolve the issue. Good luck and happy holidays!
I appreciate the edits to maybe make the articles more inline with Google, but the only thing I find frustrating is when they edit it at least 7 times! And no, I haven't changed what they did, they just edit themselves. I have no idea why.
Increases after edits are a good indication as long as the edit contains the correct information. Most comments not in favor of the edits are because of incorrect data caused by the edits.
Working as a team, we can make sure the articles are factual and increase traffic and overall stats.
I had one article edited and got a big traffic boost. If it holds up, I will have to try updating a little more.
I've been writing on here for over 10 years now, so I have watched a lot of changes pass through F=HP requirements of its writers over time.
The one fact that I do recommend that my peers accept is the change. It may hurt, but if it does, it's because they are trying to make our "stuff" more acceptable and interesting to the HP reading public.
Sure, I hate their "meddling" in my Hubs, what write wouldn't? But, I have learned that I can change over time and if their changed don't work for me, I still have my original sitting there in my PAGES folder!
PS.This was typed without coffee at 6:15 in the morning!
I'm fine with the Powers That Be doing edits on stuff that hasn't been updated in a while.
Just this past week they edited my lone Delishably article, which had been quietly mouldering away for the past year or two, and within a few days of the edits (which were minor) its views had jumped dramatically.
So hey, whatever voodoo y'all are doin', feel free to do it to the rest of my back catalog as well.
I feel that if the editors are doing such edits for increasing the traffic to the individual article as well as to the overall benefit of the site then it is no issue. It will be prudent to wait and see the effect of this edit on the traffic before we take up the issue with them.
...aaaand the recipe has just been edited again. These people are just undoing, and redoing, the same edits over and over again. It's ridiculous!
I've sent another email, telling them to please stop. If it's edited again, I'll just kill it, and move it to my own site.
I am sorry to hear about your frustrations with the edits. I hope you can come to a happy place with HP!
After three bad edits, I'm out. I've moved this recipe to my own web site, and am in the process of moving the rest of them.
Been there, done that. However, I only do it when the change or the demand for a specific change is earnings/SEO destructive. If the change is not earnings/SEO destructive, then I don't care.
by Kristin Kaldahl 3 years ago
I have 37 articles on PetHpful that are undergoing editing....AGAIN. This happens a lot. I'm expected to go into each article, read it, fix the mistakes the editors put into my articles, and repost the articles. I have other writing projects (book, book trailer) pending for my agent, and I don't...
by Anne 8 years ago
So for the last couple of weeks I have actually been studying at University.I now log into my hubpages account and some editor has made all these changes. It reads so stupid.I am furious that someone has touched and changed my hubs! HOW DARE YOU!I notice my earnings too have gone down.My email to...
by Rupert Taylor 11 months ago
In case you haven't noticed, there's a massive edit of Owlcation articles going on. For the most part, I can only quibble about changes made, although a few irritating issues have cropped up. I suggest checking the editing because some errors are finding their way into articles.One or two of my...
by Paul Edmondson 4 years ago
For those of you that are writers on AxleAddict, we wanted to let you know that we are doing a small test on the site. Our plan is to edit every article on AxleAddict in the next couple of weeks. At this point most of the edits will be small. They will include title updates, sharpening of...
by Cholee Clay 5 years ago
I have an article that an editor has made substantial changes too. Including adding a bio that they wrote themselves. I have not seen an edit this bad in quite some time on one of my articles, and I do not want to go through the whole article and rewrite half of it. I've already spent countless...
by Dr. John Anderson 8 years ago
When I save an edited a hub, the saves appear in edit mode. But, the changes do not show in the published version. This applies in both Chrome and Mozilla and is not fixed by refreshing. It appears as though the published page is a version behind i.e. it is reflecting what was a saved previously...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2023 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|