Not indexed in google yet even after building backlinks

1. 52

   gr8wellwisherposted 3 years ago

   I wrote an article; https://discover.hubpages.com/art/How-t … ee-with-AI
   It's been more than a week it's not indexed. Google has its terms if the article is already on an indexed site, the article will be indexed fast. I also made backlinks, strong social shares (even my share on Reddit got trending and that post of my share got indexed on google in 1 hour).

   replyreport
   1. 69

      eugbugposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      It can take that long and if it gets moved to a network site, it may take another week for that to be indexed. Sometimes Google takes months or a year to update titles of articles when they're changed.

      replyreport
   2. 65

      CYong74posted 3 years agoin reply to this

      It takes time to get indexed. Probably longer for Discover because of all sorts of reasons.
      
      Backlinks, social shares, etc, rarely helps. Especially those you created yourself. I.E. UGC links.
      
      In the end, it's the quality of your content. How unique it is, how well written it is, etc. Not to pour it on but you really need to improve the language if you want Google to understand what you're writing. Do know too that Grammarly is an editing tool, not a writing tool. It is also far from perfect. You must be able to detect your own errors. Your hub is currently full of that.

      replyreport
   3. 83

      Kenna McHughposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      You have some good advice here. I suggest you follow it.

      replyreport
2. 77

   theraggededgeposted 3 years ago

   Not sure about the indexing, but you need to tidy up your title. It's NFT and AI. Maybe that will make a difference?
   
   How to Make NFT Art Free with AI
   
   And this sentence is incorrect, "the two AI applications I will be talking about are one of their kind."
   
   Two different things cannot be one of their kind. It needs rewording.
   
   There are errors like that all the way through, "the second application makes it even lazy, which does not require a keyword." Should be 'easier', not 'lazy.' It should read, "the second application makes it even easier because it does not require a keyword."
   .
   My suggestion is that you get someone to give it a thorough proofreading. Run it through Grammarly and then Hemingway (both free).
   
   Good luck.

   replyreport
   1. 52

      gr8wellwisherposted 3 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, ma'am, you are right about the title but as this was the first title I was reminded again and again by the tips on upper-right to change your title to get featured. That's why I did it.
      I wrote a completely different article but it was being rejected by HubPages then I wrote an email to the editor with the issue and he cleared my article asap it was surely a problem with their moderation software I believe.
      I used Grammarly many times thanks for the suggestion.
      I will update it for sure.

      replyreport
      1. 69

         PaulGoodman67posted 3 years agoin reply to this

         Bev's correct, your English is not good. That means you will likely struggle, indexing or no indexing. There's more to it than just getting the spelling right.

         replyreport
         1. 52

            gr8wellwisherposted 3 years agoin reply to this

            Paul, it is not full of mistakes there are just some you can not say that my English is not good just for that reason I told I had to change it as it was accepted by HubPages (featured) there might be some mistakes that I made when updating my article (to get it featured).

            replyreport
            1. 69

               PaulGoodman67posted 3 years agoin reply to this

               There are problems like punctuation and sentence structure, use of tenses. If you don't see problems with unwieldy sentences like the one I've put below, written by you in a comment above, that's an issue. There's a limit to what software like Grammarly can do.
               
               "I wrote a completely different article but it was being rejected by HubPages then I wrote an email to the editor with the issue and he cleared my article asap it was surely a problem with their moderation software I believe."

               replyreport
               1. 52

                  gr8wellwisherposted 3 years agoin reply to this

                  Yes, some mistakes I must've made in the panic when my article was rejected, at first, but I got the email from editorial staff that they stopped indexing due to the quality check (again).

                  replyreport
                  1. 77

                     theraggededgeposted 3 years agoin reply to this

                     But you still haven't fixed any of them. You've spent time posting here when you could have been editing your article.
                     
                     Suggestion: write shorter sentences. One sentence = one point. One paragraph = one idea expanding on the first sentence.
                     
                     For example, the paragraph beginning "NFT stands for non-fungible token." Rather than explaining the concept simply (as you promised), it goes off on a complex and unrelated tangent about crypto.
                     
                     If you carefully read your text aloud, you may be able to pick up all this convoluted awkwardness.
                     
                     That whole paragraph can be distilled down to:
                     
                     "NFT stands for non-fungible token. 'Non-Fungible' means it is unique and non-replaceable. NFT can be any digital file, such as audio, video, or photo that is stored on a blockchain.
                     
                     More words do not equal better writing. One essential skill in writing is knowing which words should be cut.

                     replyreport
                     1. 52

                        gr8wellwisherposted 3 years agoin reply to this

                        I have updated my article but I can't change the whole para you told me to do so. I think it is good for a newbie. Thanks for your suggestion.

                        replyreport
                  2. 69

                     PaulGoodman67posted 3 years agoin reply to this

                     There's no question, in my opinion, that the emailed you received from staff is correct and the writing is low quality.
                     
                     Software of any sort cannot fix the problems that Bev and I have outlined: issues like sentence structure, punctuation, syntax. You need to find a real human to help you, who has a strong command of written English.
                     
                     Then you need to rewrite your article.

                     replyreport
                     1. 52

                        gr8wellwisherposted 3 years agoin reply to this

                        You look like a veteran writer, but you still don't know that it's a general forum rule never to point out anyone's linguistic error. @theraggededge has also pointed out my mistake rather than replying with bad comments on my English.
                        The editorial staff was never dissatisfied with my English, if they were, my article hadn't been featured. I believe, I wrote a perfect article, but in the panic of being not featured at first (which was a software-side bug for sure) I changed the article again and again. After I emailed the HubPages staff they immediately featured my article.
                        But some of the mistakes pointed out by @theraggededge are appreciated.

                        replyreport