May Articles Be Published on Hubpages That Are a Dialog With ChatGPT?

1. 66

   eugbugposted 2 years ago

   As above.

   replyreport
   1. 86

      jansharesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Wouldn't posting the dialog of ChatGPT as content answering your questions in an article trip the ticker? Leave it alone, Eugene. Don't let curiosity kill the cat.

      replyreport
   2. STAFF

      Matt Wellsposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      No.

      replyreport
   3. 82

      Miebakagh57posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      As Matt's 'No' above.

      replyreport
2. 79

   phillippeengelposted 2 years ago

   In fact, I think it would be a wickedly funny idea. Imagine having an AI bot as your co-author in writing an article - they could definitely come up with some unique perspectives and provide you with the best possible content.
   
   Of course, you have to be careful not to get carried away when talking to your new 'co-writer'. Try not to let them take over the conversation, or else your article may end up sounding like one giant chatbot monologue.
   
   On the other hand, if you manage to maintain a good balance between human and robotic input, then who knows what kind of creative things could happen? I mean, why not give it a try? It'll be sure to entertain readers, that's for sure.

   replyreport
   1. 95

      AliciaCposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Matt says that this can't be done. It may be a creative idea, but if HubPages won't publish the article, there's no point in writing it on this site.

      replyreport
   2. 82

      Miebakagh57posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      That idea may be good. But Matt, hubpages' staff said 'No'.

      replyreport
3. 79

   ravirajan01posted 2 years ago

   Yes, I agree, Linda. However, this can be the catalyst for a nice fictional, satiric article laced with black humor.
   
   The title can be "My Mis-experiments with ChatGPT."

   replyreport
4. 82

   Miebakagh57posted 2 years ago

   Whatsoever the challenge or solute,chat gpt can't replicate the human touch that is soulish, emotional, and...you know that the bot is not a person.                                        But I don't know of a website that accept publication of a AI bot generated contents. And if such site exists, and its paying writers, it would find it a hard task to continue the payment.

   replyreport
5. 86

   jansharesposted 2 years ago

   Check this out. There's a call for a 6-month halt on the use of AI until the kinks can be worked out. Experts are admitting that it's getting out of control and can do harm.
   https://www.cbs17.com/news/technology/m … y-chatgpt/

   replyreport
   1. 95

      AliciaCposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      This is a very interesting article. Thanks for sharing it, Janis.

      replyreport
      1. 86

         jansharesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

         You're welcome, Linda. I'm trying to share whatever I can so we can see both sides of the controversy. Did you see the other link I shared from CBS's 60 Minutes? It's on Paul Goodman's forum post.

         replyreport
   2. 82

      Miebakagh57posted 2 years agoin reply to this

      I visited the link and was denied access.                                               The reason was that the 'Content was not avalaile to your country.'                                   ChatGpt shouldn't be used for writing online content. But it's a great tool fit for playing games.

      replyreport
      1. 86

         jansharesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

         Sorry about that, Miebakagh. Hopefully, you’ll see other articles about it. I agree, people should be weary about this tool. I call it “playing with the devil.”

         replyreport
         1. 66

            eugbugposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            This is what ChatGPT said when asked for a response:
            
            "The phrase "playing with the Devil" is often used to describe engaging in risky or dangerous activities that could lead to negative consequences. While there may be potential risks associated with using AI language models like myself, it is important to note that these risks can be mitigated by taking appropriate precautions and using me in a responsible manner.
            
            As an AI language model, I do not have any inherent motive or intention to cause harm to users. My purpose is to provide accurate and useful information in response to user queries, based on the data and programming that I have been trained on. However, as with any technology, there is always the possibility of unintended consequences or vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors.
            
            In summary, while it is important to be mindful of the potential risks associated with using AI language models, it is not necessarily accurate to equate this with "playing with the Devil". By taking appropriate precautions and using me responsibly, users can benefit from the many useful applications of AI technology"
            
            Do you always have to use that phrase "it is important to note"? It's so tiresome.
            
            "I apologize if my use of the phrase "it is important to note" has become tiresome. As an AI language model, I am programmed to use a variety of phrases and expressions to help clarify and emphasize key points in my responses.
            
            While my programming is designed to help ensure that my responses are clear and easy to understand, I understand that certain phrases may become repetitive or overly used. If there are specific phrases or expressions that you would prefer me to avoid in my responses, please let me know and I will do my best to adjust my language accordingly."

            replyreport
            1. 86

               jansharesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

               Interesting. Tell him I said "hi." (Just kidding)

               replyreport
            2. 82

               Miebakagh57posted 2 years agoin reply to this

               Silly and stupid ChatGpt. It's out to drown all writer in its bank of artificial programming!

               replyreport
         2. 66

            eugbugposted 2 years agoin reply to this

            Wary and weary.

            replyreport
            1. 86

               jansharesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

               Thank you, Eugene. I am both.

               replyreport
               1. 66

                  eugbugposted 2 years agoin reply to this

                  

                  replyreport
         3. 82

            Miebakagh57posted 2 years agoin reply to this

            'playing with the (D)devill', exactly. But see my reply to eugbug above. And thanks.

            replyreport
6. 83

   Kenna McHughposted 2 years ago

   Janis, it is an interesting article. I am curious how this will all get sorted out. Some are jumping on board immediately, so they won't miss out on the possibilities, whatever they will be.

   replyreport
   1. 86

      jansharesposted 2 years agoin reply to this

      Exactly, Kenna. It’s all moving too fast where users are throwing caution to the wind and risking trouble.

      replyreport