To set the stage, I quote from http://total.eclipse.co.il/2006/05/05/t … ciousness/ , one of the tope Google results for the phrae:
According to a materialist Cognitive Scientist, consciousness can be understood in terms of simple associative interactions among a large number of small simple computing elements. Thus, the problem of consciousness reduces down to understanding the behavior of the individual elements and the interactions between them. This is a reductionist approach, but it is a different kind of reductionism in the sense that the nature and scope of the “modules” is very different.
In contrast, a different approach would be to suppose that consciousness is an emergent phenomenon. Emergence is defined as a state or process in which higher-order or macroscopic properties are irreducible to lower-level properties. Emergent properties are generally unpredictable they are the properties which make something greater than the sum of its parts. This fits well within the Cognitive Science framework. Few scientists believe that a single neuron is intelligent, though somehow the sum of neurons in our brain in their particular order and alignment provide the basis of intelligent behaviour.
I call a halt right there. Few scientists believe that? What about http://discovermagazine.com/2005/jun/single-brain-cell ?
I say "emergent consciousness" is nonsense. Consciousness is nothing more than feedback and echoes. It IS reducible.
In another thread, I said unconsciousness proves that. How on earth could you become unconscious if your consciousness were not entirely dependent upon physical structures? How could you be semi-conscious?
Saying that consciousness is "emergent" is like saying a spreadsheet formula result is emergent. It's a useless word that means nothing.
I see no mystery of mind.
Atoms combine to form emergent molecules.
Just a thought…
My point is that there is no mystery. It's obviously just feedback. There is nothing special or mysterious about self awareness - it's just eavesdropping on the buzz.
Works for me.
And, to go off topic, it “immediately” dies without oxygen just like a candle flame. To me this means it is simultaneously dependent on both constant chemical and electrical activity. I’m still trying to decide what to make of that…
Specifically, does that chemical and electrical activity create the containment mechanism for the consciousness? Or is it, itself the consciousness?
If it is the former, then consciousness merely leaves to where we do not know. If it is the latter, then the consciousness irrevocably dies.
The evidence, in my opinion, points to the second alternative.
However, like the rest of us, I want it to be the first.
Tough town, life.
That's kind of a "tree-falls-in-the-forest/does-it-make-a-sound" kind of question.
by Catherine Giordano 17 months ago
I wrote a hub about evolution which explains why Creationism, Creation Science, and Intelligent Design are not science (although they pretend to be). I can't decide which is the better title picture--the one currently on top (Man) or the second one (Ape). I keep switching them. I'm looking for...
by Alexander A. Villarasa 4 years ago
The naturalist's perspective that life could come from non-life, and intelligent life from non-intelligent life is so simplistic as to defy logic and reason. The nature of life and intelliegnce is so complex for them to be expressed in such a seemingly simple concept called "evolution by...
by Cecilia 8 years ago
Can you be an Creationist Atheist or a Religious Scientist? Is it possible or are you either one or the other?
by Jenny Pugh 7 years ago
Each person have experiences unique to him. Variations of human experiences are as many as there are people in this whole world and this is a very good reason why any sensible person should respect every other person because nobody will ever know exactly what this other person can do once provoked....
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|