Anyone still glued to their screen searching for Panda progres may be interested in this article based on an interview with Matt Cutts.
Please no posts saying 'stop worrying', 'I am so bored of this', 'blah blah blah'.
I'm of to write some more stuff for my website and ponder my social marketing future over a cup of tea and a scone - cheerio, and toodle-loo.
I noticed in the article that it was mentioned how sites such as Library of Congress, Media sites and Newspaper sites greatly benefited from the Google change.
Of course Media and Newspapers invest a lot of money for their online publication and are not happy for any competition.
My issue with Media and Newspapers is they ALL duplicate the same story word for word and use auto-generated news. This is what Google says it is against and then turn around and "rewards" those that pay to do exactly that!!! How hypocritical.
Does anyone else see a glimmer of hope here?
"There is definitely still room for improvement in the space of low-quality content -- or in trying to reward higher-quality content." - Matt Cutts.
Sorry, but I can't see the stuff that this guy Cutts says as anything other than spin/PR.
After all, he's hardly going to tell the truth is he? Which would be something along the lines of "OK, so we've weeded out some of the spam, but we haven't replaced it with anything better and for a lot of people searching, it's actually worse."
This is true! Before, if I ever see or hear of a new virus I'd Google it, and there would be several mentions on the front page, especially for a new attack.
Now you have to look several pages in to find something recent. The front page might mention it, but it'd be years out of date and with technology moving at the rate it does, old news on viruses is no use.
Old and out-dated news/articles are the worst I am finding now on page 1 or even page 2 in Google simply because it is media, newspaper or such pages. It is a waste of user time.
I had begun to use Google more, but have gone back to Yahoo for web searches. Still have to weed through junk, but less duplicated and totally unrelated work by the "authoritative sites."
Are they cherry scones, Spacey? If so I'm on my way! Does anyone know if HubPages is one of the sites that Blekko has totally blocked?
Not today I'm afraid. Sainsbury's Cherry Scones are my absolute favourites (I am a 72 year old woman trapped in a 29 year old's body).
I think very possibly Blekko have blocked HubPages - if you search 'any keyword site:hubpages' the results say no results on Blekko - then give some results from Bing.
If you just search HubPages it brings up HP home as the top result then no other entry.
I managed to get a hub of mine to appear in Blekko's SERPS (or rather, in the Bing "additional results" section) - but only by entering its most popular search term in quote marks (and this is a hub that gets 100-200 views a day). No quote marks, no hub.
Reading the article in your original post reminds me very strongly of the changes that eBay announced a couple of years back. In their email to sellers, these changes were touted as a big improvement. However, when you read the terms more carefully, they were only an "improvement" for people selling multiple, cheap items, because you could list any number of identical items for just one listing fee. For anyone selling one-off/unique items, the "improvements" were anything but.
It's the same with the Google algorithm change - the search "improvements" ARE improvements if your name happens to be [insert any large retailer here]. But they're not improvements for anyone else, including the poor general public trying to search for something relevant!
How very rude of Blekko and totally uncalled for!
Have you tried the M&S cherry scones that are sold loose in the bakery section? They are my absolute favourites!
Blekko is a slash tag based search engine that operates based on user contribution. ahem.. hint ?
I have no idea what that means but I'm not worried. I'm pretty sure they weren;t contributing to my traffic and are not reponsible for the 60% decline I have experienced.
Lol - sorry only just got the 'stop worrying' bit - I'm a bit slow today, I think it is because I am a day older than I was yesterday.
I have just been researching an article and the number 2 result on Google was: "Amazon.com: Hello Kitty - Squinkies: Toys & Games
Amazon.com: Hello Kitty - Squinkies: Toys & Games.
www.amazon.com/s?...Squinkies...n%3A165 … t..." - it is a search query results page with no relevant result on it!!!! It wasn't even a buy focussed query. 'Hello Kitty Squinkies' could be from anyone trying to find out if such a thing exists, when they will be released, what they look like etc etc - I know the search traffic for the term will be tiny but it doesnt seem write that Amazon search query pages with no relevant result should out rank genuinely useful articles, which I know exist because I have now found them.
Rant over, and relax.
Average joe is not using blekko because of it's complex nature. Current users of blekko are part of tech savvy crowd, so you can ignore them.
Did you all see the recent HP blog? http://blog.hubpages.com/
A Google Adsense employee is the guest blogger. It sounds promising to me.
I am also finding so many popular, high ranking sites just cut and pasting a press release and literally adding nothing to it. Smaller sites, that do have something useful to add, but have affiliate links are not appearing until 2nd or 3rd page.
Hope this improves soon as it is driving me nuts.
A separate issue. With all the ads that are now missing from our hubs, it is getting darn hard to get a click. I hope they hurry up fixing that.
by Will Apse5 years ago
There is a lot of SEO related stuff about Panda in these forums, so here is something about quality and the kinds of content Google is trying to find and offer to searchers:It comes from Amit Singhal, Google Fellow and...
by Ben Aidoo3 years ago
Is it true that Google is inundated by billions of articles that it's suffering from a system overload, and unable to give quality attention to new and better written articles? Just imagine, the poor Google crawler had...
by Has_aWayWithWords7 years ago
Ok, this makes no sense, I have a few articles on AC that are in the top 3 pages of google, 1 article is actually in the top spot for its keyword phrase. How can I get that one in top spot and not a single hubpage...
by Silver Rose6 years ago
Here's the article with the google confirmation:http://www.webpronews.com/daniweb-panda-2011-09There have been some big casualties, but it looks like hubpages overall survived.If you are a surger and have stayed up, or...
by NotPC5 years ago
I have been experimenting with Google to find new techniques to drive more search traffic and I found one that is quite silly but has doubled my traffic within about a week of updating my hub.Here it is: THE RATING...
by Katherine Tyrrell3 years ago
Search Metrics has produced its perennial update about winners and losers post a Panda Update - in this case the 4.1 which commenced its slow roll-out last weekHere's a link to the report "Panda Update 4.1: Winners...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.