The Secret to Success on Article Sites!

Jump to Last Post 1-12 of 12 discussions (23 posts)
  1. Pearldiver profile image67
    Pearldiverposted 12 years ago


    How should we measure 'Success?'

    Here is a Hub Pages 'Writer'

    Why did I ever Believe that Writing was a purer form than this?

    I feel I may have to lower my ethics to become a REAL WRITER.

    I can just pretend and multiply that pretense by 2686 hubs.

    2686 hubs x 3 impressions per hub = 8055 impressions per day

    8055 x 7 = 56385 per week.. or

    244,335 per month.

    244,335 x 14 months = 3,420,690 Impressions in total for the last 14 months
    - HP's Slice

    Hell But that's only 1,368,276 for HP - Yet that's pretty Successful hmm

    Just 22554 per week working SUCCESSFULLY FOR HP

    No Wonder I am an UNsuccessful Writer - I DON'T PRETEND!

    I Don't Put a Hub on the Net Pretending to be XYZ. com or Yahooooo. Com - Just so that I can Catch unsuspecting Googlers who will then click on the Impressions that are, as with the income derived from them... shared with HP. (albeit deceptively?)

    I Wonder How GREAT WRITERS Like This LOOK to Google and co?

    I Wonder because Google is also successful at sharing adsense income with Great Writers and Great Sites that can Successfully do this BS...

    I think I will start Researching this SUCCESS Stuff.. I'm sure I will shed a lot of light on this SUCCESS FORMULA...

    Wow... Imagine a peanut like me, believing that Writing was Special sad

    I wonder if you have to be a GREEDY Writer with No Ethics, to be SUCCESSFUL?

    1. canadawest99 profile image60
      canadawest99posted 12 years agoin reply to this

      There is no way they can outrank the real website.  I checked a bunch of their SEO stats and their hubpages aren't on the first 3 or 4 pages of google, so they aren't taking direct search traffic.  My guess, is they are using other linkbuilding tools to bring in direct traffic from blogs and social sites, bypassing google all together.   I see nothing wrong with that.

  2. CMHypno profile image83
    CMHypnoposted 12 years ago

    Surely a hubber with all those hubs who can only manage a hubber score of 35 should be culled?

    I read a couple of those so called hubs, and no wonder they can churn them out at such a rate, and they are also taking traffic from the sites rightful owners, as well as duping searchers.

    I don't want to be harsh, and maybe these hubs make money, but for HP to retain any credibility this type of dross needs to go.

    Maybe new hubbers should be given a certain time to get their hubber score up to a certain level, if they don't they get a warning to shape up and if they fail to get their act together their account should be deleted?

    And is there some way of stopping the use of www companyname in a title and url?

  3. Ritsos profile image41
    Ritsosposted 12 years ago

    That really is pants and should be banned .... I wonder if he contacted these compoanies and offered to write an article for them for a small fee though .. probably a good way to make money with a lot of potential HB viewers but for HP credibility he should go

  4. Ign Andy profile image56
    Ign Andyposted 12 years ago

    check this one as well: (so no backlink for him/her)

    I think this person related, or probably twins big_smile
    their Dlnet.Delta.Com hub are very similar.

  5. Pearldiver profile image67
    Pearldiverposted 12 years ago

    The figures work for HP..

    Why would they slay a golden goose when they can ruin a poet? hmm

    They KNOW.. And They KNOW that they have hundreds of These 'Writers' on the site!

    But they are earners and they are Linkers which give HP a certain degree of 'Credibility' doesn't it?

    Lots of HP 'WRITERS' - Pull this type of traffic stunt.. HP Reward them for it! They are 'Linkers' and some newbies here think are GREAT WRITERS!

    This one must have had nearly 10,000,000 views in 18 months - From Scalping the traffic of legitimate companies.. If they tried it with my company in such a way - I would Sue their butts and get an injunction against the hosting site who are legally equally culpable - irrespective of hollow claims to the contrary!
    I would think that that very point should be a good enough reason to Take Down this BS - right across the board and with those copycat hotshots that also do this stuff! sad
    Not a Pretty Picture... when you consider that some joined this site to try to earn extra income after loosing their properties to thieving bankers who used stunts like this to over inflate their true positions and asset values! hmm

    1. CMHypno profile image83
      CMHypnoposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      But is it the internet equivalent of something like diet pills - gives good results at first, but could kill you in the end?

      1. Pearldiver profile image67
        Pearldiverposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        Sure, maybe that is exactly the problem, but it also depends on what one's ethics are doesn't it? hmm

        This is what is taunted as Successful Writing? 
        As you can see - is certainly can be financially Successful!
        I think perhaps Bona Fide Writers have provided the front for this backroom exercise? hmm

        Irrespective of ANY Justification... it is Wrong, Deceptive and it is not acceptable by any standards promoted here or anywhere else... Why would you risk the futures of so many people with this BS? hmm

        1. psycheskinner profile image81
          psycheskinnerposted 12 years agoin reply to this

          You can't take traffic to the bank, I wonder what the actually earnings are.

  6. ThomasE profile image68
    ThomasEposted 12 years ago

    This forum is getting pretty negative at the moment. At the end of the day, no one HAS to post on hubpages. If you don't like how it does business... go elsewhere.

    1. CMHypno profile image83
      CMHypnoposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I don't think that it is negative to want HubPages to strive to be the best writing platform that it can be

      What that platform is will always fluctuate and change over time, and different hubbers will have different opinions. That's what the debate is open for

      But, in purely my opinion, the hubs we are discussing are a negative. Welcome for anyone to put their opinion forward as to why they are a good thing for HP, as there may be loads of factors that I am not aware of. But if the question is never asked, how can we learn?

      But we have all taken a big knock lately, and as I am a huge fan of HP I am willing to adapt and change so that the site can remain successful and move forward

      1. ThomasE profile image68
        ThomasEposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        There is a difference between constructive criticism and striving to improve the quality of a site, and accusing people of being dishonest or lying. And, Pearldiver is accusing both hubpages and ibuxxup of being dishonest.

        Hubpages has known about this user for months.

        If Pearldiver believes that hubpages is dishonest... I really don't see why he or she would want to post here.

        1. Mutiny92 profile image64
          Mutiny92posted 12 years agoin reply to this

          I don't think that was being said.  I think HP is in the midst of defining quality and working to make sure that their own policies can be uniformly enforced.

          I am in full support of identifying articles and hubbers that the community believes may be considered substandard.  Talking about them feeds the conversation and may help HP identify methods and criteria for making the site better in the future.

          My personal opinion is that they should not implement these changes until they have thoroughly and completely reviewed the proposals. 

          In the mean time, I hope HP appreciates the communities discussions on what our views of substandard may be.

  7. Mutiny92 profile image64
    Mutiny92posted 12 years ago

    Wow!  An impressive, results-oriented hubber that one is!  Over one million views.  I can't say that this is what I would consider quality writing...

    RyanKett posted about this guy a while ago with a whopping 10 million views doing something similar.  Check out the comments!

    They sure make my strategy look dismal.

    1. habee profile image92
      habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I don't know the above hubber, but I checked out his/her hubs, and they can't compare to the hubber with all those hubs that have misleading titles. The diaper article wasn't bad, actually, and it shows the writer did some research.

  8. rebekahELLE profile image87
    rebekahELLEposted 12 years ago

    Those hub titles are deceptive. I've never understood how writers think that's ok. I hope the profile has been flagged. Last week another hubber with over 1800 hubs was flagged and banned - the hubs were keyword stuffed.

  9. Randy Godwin profile image60
    Randy Godwinposted 12 years ago

    These type hubs have been brought to the attention of HP staff for a couple of weeks now.  It would be nice if someone from staff addressed the concerns of the writers concerning this problem.  Real nice!  smile

  10. habee profile image92
    habeeposted 12 years ago

    I don't understand how someone who writes hubs with titles like and can get away with it. I mean, if they wanted to write a review of Toys R Us, fine, but not with a title like It's just too deceptive.

    1. Randy Godwin profile image60
      Randy Godwinposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      What are you doing up so early?  It's not even noon yet!  lol

      1. habee profile image92
        habeeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        I didn't stay up all night! I'm trying to get back to "normal hours." lol

  11. Misha profile image63
    Mishaposted 12 years ago

  12. melbel profile image93
    melbelposted 12 years ago

    The thing is, though, that he has well over 3000 hubs. With that many hubs, getting a million views is almost cake. Don't look at the million number alone... look at the number of hubs. It's kind of blah -- I mean, he averages only about 370 views IN ALL per hub.

    I average waaaaaaay more than that per hub.

    It comes to asking the question, "How do you measure success?"

    Is success someone like him who mills out a billion hubs and gets very little traffic per each?

    Or is success someone who produces quality hubs that receive MORE traffic per each, but less overall views (because of much few hubs)

    1. canadawest99 profile image60
      canadawest99posted 12 years agoin reply to this

      What about the other guy getting 10M views on only 153 very average hubs.  Something else going on there.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)