I was hubhopping today and came across maybe 3 hubs that had official Google logos on their hubs. You should be aware that you need permission to use Google logos.
"These Brand Features can be used only pursuant to these Guidelines, our Terms and Conditions, and for the specific purposes for which Google has given permission...
The only time you can use Brand Features without advance written permission is if there is clear and express language on our website stating that you can use those Brand Features without first obtaining permission, such as is the case with our search boxes."
I'm wondering if you wouldn't mind sharing an example or two here about what sort of photo/logo you are describing?
Thanks for the reminder, Uninvited Writer. I hadn't seen the Google logos being used around the site but I am seeing other images that I am sure HPTeam or someone else will flag soon as being "stolen" or "used without permission." I also haven't been very active here in the past months, so I am not viewing things, in general, here.
I should check my own hubs - earliest ones I put pictures to while still very inexperienced at the site.
You really should conduct research into copyright laws/Fair Use Doctrine etc...
There are some applications that permit the uses of not only images but logos too; news stories, critiques, comparisons, analysis, reviews, educational and a couple more uses that do not require you to obtain permission.
However, with private publishing platforms this can be different as they put in their TOS whatever tickles their fancy.
Nevertheless you should always attempt to at least get permission since its the right thing to do and always give credit.......
If one has a few hours to read you may want to browse this
This may help one get a better understanding to compare to the opinions of some of the HP "experts".......
Google has the right to say when and where their images are used; they ask you to ask for permission.
Do not patronize me, I am well aware of fair use and copyright...
"The difficulty in claiming fair use is that there is no way to guarantee that your use will qualify as fair. You may believe that your use qualifies—but, if the copyright owner disagrees, you may have to resolve the dispute in a courtroom. Even if you ultimately persuade the court that your use was in fact a fair use, the expense and time involved in litigation may well outweigh any benefit of using the material in the first place."
What makes you think that I was referring to you??? If that would have been my intention I would have made it known. My comment was directed more to mythbuster than anyone else plus anyone else who may have other questions. Be very assured that if I have anything to say to anyone I will make it known.
My comments do not address your points either about court proceedings which are very real and you are also right that Fair Use is mostly a defense than anything else not a Carte Blanche & yes even Google is bound by Fair Use. Although as you point out who in their right mind would take on Google.
I'm sorry if you assumed that my remarks were directed at you because they were not, you would have had no doubts nor would I have had any qualms were they originally intended for your persona.
You can use this one if you like...
.. at least I think you can. Maybe I broke a law somewhere?
While I'm about it...
By the way I don't think this is self publicity, it's just being helpful.
Redrawing a company's trademark or copyright doesn't absolve you of violating trademark or copyright laws.
It's just like selling bootleg Mickey Mouse drawings. Disney could come after you. To say nothing of the scary legal juggernaut that is Hello Kitty. (I'm not kidding; they came after an artist I know who was drawing hilarious Hello Chthulu cartoons.)
Thanks Greekgeek, I am now officially worried. On the plus side, the fridge magents I am selling with the "you know what" symbol on them should become quite rare and valuable in the event of a trial.
I shall position myself as the little guy against corporate, er, bigness.
Strictly speaking, and this will form an important part of my defence, Google, is a word from the dictionary - it means a lot of zeroes.
I believe there is actually a get-out under the "fair use" concept, which permits the use of trademarks and logos for satirical purposes.
Would the panel consider the above to be an infringement of anything?
Mark, the Chaotic Good side of me suspects that Google is less aggressive about chasing people down than some companies.
Question. Does Hubpages allow us to use the <img> tag in Text Capsules? If so, one could simply sign up for Zazzle, then embed Google Doodles as affiliate links. The problem is that according to Zazzle's affiliate TOS, you may NOT take the graphics and re-upload them (say, into a photo capsule); you actually have to leave them hosted on Zazzle and use affiliate links to display them, so that the artist/owner retains control over the graphics.
Edit: drat, it doesn't let us, does it? Scratch that idea.
by Lee 6 years ago
I have not used hubpages for around a year and have recently started to get back into it, I must admit that in the beginning I was a little Naive and posted images into my hubs willy nilly without thought of where they came from. I have recently recieved an email from a photo place saying that I...
by H Lax 11 years ago
Is it against copyright laws to take a photo of the cover or pictures inside my books to use in my hubs? or photos of portraits/paintings from unknown artists I have on my wall?
by Wilma Proops 15 years ago
I noticed a Hubpage which suggested ripping off original content and putting it on a blog with adsense to make money. It suggested that you could use the same method to make the content for a hubpage. I know that Google will ban adsense accounts for these copyright infringements. ...
by ofmelancholy 13 years ago
Picture covers bon jovi by the way.
by Jeff Davis 13 years ago
is it necessary to cite the origin of your photos if you downloaded them from somewhere? and is it necessary to copyright or somehow mark photos posted that you yourself has taken? thank you in advance for any input.
by Ronald E Franklin 7 years ago
I'm planning a hub about one particular actor in one particular scene of a movie. Without a visual representation of the actor in the scene the article would be meaningless, but no free or non-copyrighted photos appear to exist. To me this seems a classic case for Fair Use, as reflected in this...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID
|This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
|This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
|HubPages Google Analytics
|HubPages Traffic Pixel
|This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
|Amazon Web Services
|Google Hosted Libraries
|Google Custom Search
|Google AdSense Host API
|Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace
|We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
|Conversion Tracking Pixels
|We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
|Author Google Analytics
|Amazon Tracking Pixel