|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
I havent watched the clip yet, but this ought to make one folks squirm: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-573994 … zed-sites/
On the upside, maybe my SEO strategy of just writing whatever will finally pay off!
Yeah, I like to think this stuff works in my favor too. I've always been too lazy to figure out how to spin articles or link farm or do whatever the stuff is that came out more recently anyway, so hopefully whatever I've been doing counts as satisfactory under the new parameters.
Seems like Google is cracking down on spun articles and private blog networks too
http://www.webpronews.com/google-de-ind … ks-2012-03
I wonder what "in particular, we are turning off a method of link analysis that we used for several years" means.. could be really bad news for the backlinking crowd..
Google has been cracking down on SEO for years and years. The issue is always how effective they are, rather than their intentions. As internet users, we want better search results. As internet writers, we have to play the game - that doesn't mean becoming a black hatter, but it does require a degree of pragmatism. I like HubPages because they effectively give you hundreds of backlinks without a great deal of effort, there isn't much need for additional backlinking anyway. Downgrading backlinks would affect hubs, even if no additional backlinking had been done (although I suspect HP would find a way of adapting in the longer term).
I don't care.
Well, maybe I do. I'm definitely Mr. Write Whatever - but my modern web geniuses tell me that sticking to niches is very important.
....but its too late for me so far as that bit of web philosophy is concerned on this website.
I've got record Google traffic for two days running here - but that was after a definite dip the two weeks prior.
I can never figure out if I should trust Google to "do what is right," or not.
Hmm how do you know you got record traffic for two consecutive days?
I'm just looking at my traffic stats from going to "account" - then over to the left sidebar "traffic sources."
Google.com is always my number one source of traffic - and I just look at that total number for an overly generalized idea of how well I'm doing.
I'm not looking at the "little Googles" - like Google Netherlands, or Google Australia.
Of course those matter too...but not so much.
But yeah, two days running - I'm at personal best levels for Google.com traffic.
Oh!! I thought you got the highest google traffic on the whole of Hub Pages
My google traffic is the most always but March isn't that good a month for me and the total views from HP just overtook Google again
March isn't good for me either - everyone is NOT buying anything and I believe it is because they are all waiting to find out what their income tax situation will be like.
I should tell you that for the very longest time HP traffic was my biggest traffic source, but here in the past five months or so is when Google finally overcame HP as my main traffic source, and since then it's only increased and increased.
Older hubs started getting the search engine love they deserved...and I also increasingly learned what and how to make a good hub anyway.
Does this mean all those SEO websites that offer keyword optimization techniques will be useless?
Ultimately, yes, that is Google's goal - to understand what pages are really about so that the words found there and the words a searchers uses will match appropriately and usefully even if none of them actually match.
Whether they can pull that off is not the question - the question is WHEN they will be able to do it.
Think of it this way: suppose you had a question that I have an answer to on one of my pages. I could find my page for you quickly because I know what it's really about regardless of the words you are I used. Now imagine it's not me, but some very smart computer that knows as much about the Internet as I know about my own pages. I really doubt we are close to that now (maybe in another decade or two) but Google wants that eventually. When they have it, keywords become completely irrelevant.
In the meantime, keywords probably will become LESS important - and then there's the new wrinkle where Google intends to punish "excessive SEO", which could mean much more than keyword stuffing. They MIGHT be smart enough now to spot an overly optimized use of phrases.
How? One method might to do linguistic comparisons between printed works (which Google has been busily digitizing for many a year now) and your web page. If it reads 'false' - if it doesn't sound like a book would sound, maybe it is over optimized. Right now, that kind of trigger might require a human review for a final decision, but as it gets smarter with feedback, who knows?
Just last week a fella was asking a question in the Q and A - he'd been rewriting all his stuff to fit a specific keyword density, and he said that he'd done that, and that now all of his stuff was GONE from it's previous high search engine result pages positions.
Google doesn't like feeling manipulated!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Also, I think focusing on something as boring and manipulative as some percentage of keyword density....is so obviously an attempt at gaming the system that anyone doing that ...will always get what they deserve.
Nobody likes to read robotic mechanical looking text, and apparently Google doesn't either!
by easyspeak8 years ago
I know it fluctuates depending on a billion variables...but for you hubbers here who are making decent money, how many backlinks do you create for each hub. Please specify between social bookmarkting, article...
by Jason Menayan6 years ago
There is a lot of bad SEO (search engine optimization) advice out there, and the use of automated services that procure backlinks to your Hubs is one particularly egregious example. Using services to get backlinks can...
by Will Apse8 years ago
I'm just reading through Google's WebMaster Central siteGiven all the talk about backlinks it is worth hearing what Google has to say.Quote:FACT: Abusing comment fields of innocent sites is a bad and risky way of...
by Tony Lawrence7 years ago
rebekahELLE posted this link in another thread: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/13/busin … r=2&hpIt tells the tale of how J.C. Penney has been SERP punished for excessive backlinking.We've been told over and...
by ofmelancholy7 years ago
When ı search about a topic the first page results are not very high quality material, ordinary stuff. Then what makes them on top page?
by AllanWrites8 years ago
Where do you normally post to establish backlinks?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.