|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Will the definition of family include non-related people who care and respect each other? Will families remain small as the improvements in contraceptive technologies and an increase in social networks is making large families a virtual dinosaur and unnecessary? What is YOUR opinion on this?
Social and cultural conceptions of family have changed many times over the centuries. Our current conception, the "nuclear family" (father, mother, and 2-3 biological children) emerged in the 1950s as part of a larger Cold War era civil defense effort to maximize the number of American people who would survive an atomic (read NUCLEAR) bomb attack. Prior to that families were multi-generational groups that included not only parents and children, but what we would today call "extended" family and distant relatives.
Eh....while I see your view.......
I was a '50's baby, but preceded by 9 siblings! And many of our friends' families were that large or larger. And I'm pretty sure none of us were deliberate results of any plan to populate the world after a nuclear attack! So unless we were just uniquely fruitful, I think the cold war analogy is off a bit.........
but yeah I think gmwilliams' questions can be answered with a yes.
And I think he left out the holocaust of abortion that's been diminishing family trees for over 40 years......
Yes, the family has undergone various evolutions and changes. It was multigeneration blood-related families, then it was strictly one generation nuclear families. In the future,the definition of family will include both blood-related and non-blood related family members. The latter applies especially as blood-related families become smaller.
As blood-related families become smaller, non-blood related families will become larger. However, there are STILL THOSE who staunchly insist that the definition of family only includes blood relatives in a nuclear family setting, sometimes not considering extended and/or distant blood-relatives as family. There is a level of clannishness and insularity existing within such people.
With the increased rise in small families, people are including friends as family. The small family has resulted in more globalization and a universalisitic attitude as far as family. The strict definition as family to mean only immediate blood-related immediate family members is becoming outcome, except among a dwindling percentage of the population. The average person has evolved beyond such narrow definitions of family.
Do you feel that - It is better to have huge families (including both blood-related and non-blood related family members) than an individual nuclear family?
A resounding no. A small sized family with blood and non-blood related members is better. At least, this family unit will be more cohesive and people will ALWAYS be in contact with each other.
Right on, quality over quantity. The more the quantity, the less the quality.
Family is the close kinship---in deeply anthropological/sociological definition of the term "kinship", that we make and not that we are necessarily born into. Biology and genetics do not make a family. Kinship does.
In the future, the family is definitely going beyond blood boundaries, that's for sure. Also, the family may evolve from nuclear status to communal status. People are going to evolve beyond their particular insularity and have a more communal and global approach to the definition of family. Family is already extending beyond blood ties to include other people into the circle. Circles of friends are considered family and some are EVEN CLOSER than blood family.
For many people, FRIENDS are FAMILY.
by Grace Marguerite Williams3 years ago
What are the 10 ways that families will evolve within the next 50-150 years? Will family includenon-blood related people as well as blood related people? How will life extension up to at least 200 years and...
by thecounterpunch9 years ago
The books Burke's Peerage & Baronetage and Burke's Landed Gentry have, for 175 years, recorded the genealogies of the UK and Ireland's titled and landed families. Often referred to as 'the aristocracy bible', these...
by Grace Marguerite Williams2 years ago
Within the next 60 to 150 years, how will the family evolve and metamorph? Will the family include less people who are blood-related and more people who are non-blood related? Will the 1-child family become...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.