jump to last post 1-4 of 4 discussions (7 posts)

1989 -2009 20 years without cold fusion. Why re we still pumping oil?

  1. hinckles koma profile image65
    hinckles komaposted 8 years ago

    Dr. B. Stanley Pons,  and his colleague, Dr. Martin Fleischmann uncovered this real eco sustaining energy source. Since the world is guided by profitable schemes; what schemes can we design that will continue profits for exon and etc. and at the same time clean the planet up a bit. basically what are your suggestions towards a commercial energy source on a realistic global scale?

  2. hinckles koma profile image65
    hinckles komaposted 8 years ago

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3442/3707028783_aae48ba3ba.jpg
    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2603/3716989257_e6aae6cbba.jpg

  3. tksensei profile image60
    tksenseiposted 8 years ago

    We are still pumping oil because we still have some.

  4. hinckles koma profile image65
    hinckles komaposted 8 years ago

    ye but we have cold fusion along with other energy harveting methods. we are pumping oil not because we still have some but because it is most profitable. So I was thinking a profitable scheme can help those corps merge into cold fusion etc. cause those corps are still going to be profiting no matter what.
    http://blogs.citypages.com/canderson/images/leeraymond.jpg

    1. tksensei profile image60
      tksenseiposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Not in a practical way.

      1. hinckles koma profile image65
        hinckles komaposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        Cold Fusion is quite practical even more so then oil but is not sponsored by the corps.

        http://peswiki.com/energy/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion

        1. tksensei profile image60
          tksenseiposted 8 years agoin reply to this

          Absolutely not. Certainly not now.

 
working