Is removing science subjects from grade 1 and grade 2 a good move?

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (11 posts)
  1. jpcmc profile image89
    jpcmcposted 6 years ago

    Is removing science subjects from grade 1 and grade 2 a good move?

    The Philppines' Department of Education recently proposed removing science in the lower grade levels.  They said that science will be included in the curriculum by grade 3.  What are the pros and cons of this proposed move?

  2. profile image0
    Sooner28posted 6 years ago

    No!  That's a horrible move.  Science education is vastly important at all levels.  Cutting it out, even just for early years, shows a lack of commitment to teaching the subject.

  3. Larry Fields profile image77
    Larry Fieldsposted 6 years ago

    I have an academic background in science (analytical chemistry). I'm disappointed that most of my fellow Americans don't have the foggiest idea what science is. They think that science is a collection of glorified fairy tales that has been voted upon by committees of 'experts'. They don't understand that science is a method for gaining knowledge about the natural world. One elegant experiment can trump thousands of 'experts'. To quote the late Nobel Laureate (physics), Richard Feynman,

    "Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts."

    That said, I don't think that First-graders or Second-graders are equipped to understand very much science, beyond interesting facts about animals.

    I did an original kitchen chemistry experiment for my young niece and even younger nephew. It was fun for both of them, but my nephew did not have the foggiest idea about the bigger picture that I was trying to draw.

    Yes, the general public definitely needs to know more about science. However I see no harm in delaying theoretical science--even at the most elementary level--until young minds have the readiness for it.

    1. scottcgruber profile image78
      scottcgruberposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I have to respectfully disagree with your main point. Children are natural scientists, from a very early age. The "terrible twos" are a period of hypothesis testing. Early science education should nurture this intrinsic need to test and explore.

  4. Paul Kuehn profile image96
    Paul Kuehnposted 6 years ago

    I think students should be introduced to science and the scientific method the earlier the better.  I attended Catholic schools in the States from grade one to grade eight in the 1950s and I never had a science course.  I felt this really hurt me and put me at a disadvantage when I finally started my first science class, Biology, when I was in the 10th grade.  Although I was interested in science, I found out when I took science courses in college that science is a lot more than just memorizing facts.  I know I would have done better if I had had the science courses in grade school.  No, I don't think grades one and two is too early to introduce science to kids.

  5. lorenmurcia profile image89
    lorenmurciaposted 6 years ago

    No, the government is reinstating the teaching of Science to Grade 1 and Grade 2 pupils. In fact, the teachers are already teaching the subject to these young pupils now. The Department of Education is readying everything for the full implementation of the Science curriculum in the said levels. Plans, programs and projects are underway so that whatever weaknesses encountered in the past will be remedied today. I knew this because our primary teachers were asked to prepare reports about their teaching of Science 1 and 2.

  6. remaniki profile image80
    remanikiposted 6 years ago

    No, it is not a good move in my opinion. I think science as a subject should be introduced to the children at a very early age.

    From personal experience I know that kids love to see pictures of animals and birds, fruits and vegetables and learn their names. They also enjoy doing little science experiments and learning a few things from the results.

    It will be difficult for them to start learning science at a later stage. Why not teach them science the fun way instead of imposing it on them as a subject and pressurizing them to get high grades?

  7. Patty Inglish, MS profile image92
    Patty Inglish, MSposted 6 years ago

    I can't decide. Although our K-5 teachers are not yet well trained in sciences in my state, State regulations do mandate science in all grades, including Kindergarten. That's fine if they receive correct training.

  8. ptosis profile image72
    ptosisposted 6 years ago

    For 1st & 2nd grades, don't have to understand very much science. Fascination of Einstein as a child with magnets had probably helped him. Check out the black liquid magnetic sculpture, there is a how-to at home to do this. Ferrofluid. … s-work-you

  9. TFScientist profile image87
    TFScientistposted 6 years ago

    Speaking as a science teacher, I would say this is a hugely damaging move. Science is vital to success in this technological age. Removing it at early ages suggests that science is not important. This is the start of a slippery slope.

    Young children are so curious about the world around them, science is the subject that answers their questions. If they go for years with these questions being ignored why should they suddenly engage with the questions just because we deem that 'the right time'

  10. profile image0
    Dan Bristolposted 5 years ago

    Removing science is fine. It leaves more room for nap time and gives us that much needed reverse momentum so we can revert to the Dark Ages and start burning witches because they're made of wood.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)