Beginning at the turn of the 20th century, have America's wars been primarily rooted in economics?
The Philippine American War was America's first war overseas. It has been said that the reason for it was primarily economic, at least partly due to fear of China dominating trade in Asia. Some would argue much of the war since that time has had economic roots, even the First World War.
I believe the Philippine war, the motive behind it, I believe was to get America involved in imperialism -- something that had gained popularity among industrialized countries circa 1900.
World War I & II were rooted in the preservation of Western Civilization. Korea & Vietnam wars were rooted in the fact - and what president Eisenhower warned the populace about - the failure of the US to shut down its war producing industries after World War II i.e. there's no profit in peace. The want, or need, to feed these industries have continued to the present.
I very much agree with you on those points;I think the war in the Philippines was an imperialist venture,and certainly Eisenhower's warning was rooted in fact, and the wars that proceeded seem to prove it.The war industry today certainly shows it.
Yes, but I would argue that all of America's wars have been rooted in economics--even before the 20th Century. Take our first war as a republic for example: The Northwest Indian War against the Miami Tribes of Western Ohio. That war occured because John Symmes and a number of speculators who bought up tracts of land for sale to pioneers risked losing their investment when it became clear that the land was too dangerous for settlement. The Governor of that Territory happened to be Arthur St. Clair, who was the President of the Continental Congress before the ratification of the Constitution. But he saw to it that the Northwest Ordnance was passed and ensured he was appointed Territorial Governor of the Northwest right about the time he had the army start building forts along the Ohio River. John Symmes was on his three-man legislature/cabinet/judiciary in Ohio. When things got bad, they used their influence to have the army invade western Ohio and crush the Indians after years of fighting. Pretty much all of our wars have a similar story behind them. I recommend reading Marine General Smedley Butler's War is a Racket.
I've heard much about Smedley and "War is a Racket";I was wanting to purchase that book.That is a fascinating piece of history,and I suspected as much.There are many facts that point to this: Land-owners control of government,expansion west,etc.
by Ari Lamstein5 years ago
What was the best invention of the 20th century?
by Nira Perkins5 years ago
Who was the most influential person of the 20th century with regards to technology and science?If you think there were a couple of individuals that were equally influential, list the most influential PEOPLE of the 20th...
by peter5656 months ago
Why pre 20th century army officers and soldiers wear different uniform in battle?Today, all the soldiers wear the exact same thing, while in battle, but prior to 20th century, in many countries ordinary soldiers and...
by MichaelStonehill6 years ago
Who are your favorite pianists of the 20th century?
by drkankles8 years ago
Who was the worst president of the 20th Century?Teddy Roosevelt to Bill Clinton
by The Real Tomato7 years ago
Most famous people of the 20th Century.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.