Why when someone is stabbed it's the killers fault but when someone is shot it's the guns fault?
I have always wondered this, I am pro gun but I think their should be some restrictions such as a better backround check but I do not feel any weapon should be banned. I really just want to ask why are their people saying that guns are bad when they were the reason we are here. No we are not barbarians but we are very diverse and also a country with a lot of angry hateful human beings that I would love to be able to protect my child and my wife from.
I'm a firm believer in "guns don't kill people, people kill people." With that said, there are some pretty obvious weapons I don't think the general public should have, like rocket launchers and grenades.
Hahahaha! That's what I think every single time. I entirely agree with you on the better background check, also at gun shows more of them as well. It's nice to see I'm not the only one thinking this!
The issue is one of efficacy: the capacity to produce an effect. If two possible drugs were on the market to treat a disease and one has a 25% success rate and the other a 90% success rate, would it make sense to prefer one over the other? Yes, of course, one is clearly more effective (higher efficacy).
Guns also have a high efficacy. That's why people feel so strongly about having them as a tool for self-defense--they work really well for the purpose. But, it works the same in reverse. They are also very effective at killing. Look at mortality rates for different methods of suicides for instance and guns are up there at the top. Treating guns the same as all other tools and weapons is quite simply stupid. It'd be no different then a doctor saying both of those drugs, previously mentioned, are exactly the same.
It makes sense to treat weapons/devices/tools which are particularly dangerous differently and we do it all the time. It takes much more training and licensing to drive a semi truck versus a car, for instance. And then again it takes even more if you transport flammable/hazardous materials. That makes sense doesn't it?
That is the theory behind bans on assault weapons and large magazines. Both of those items have a higher efficacy when it comes to slaughtering fleshy creatures.
by The Medicine Man3 years ago
Some Say:" Guns Don't Kill People do" But Aren't Guns Weapons Created To Kill?
by Michelle Zunter2 years ago
More gun violence very close to where I live yesterday. Most weapons, including guns, are available to anyone in this country at any given time. But what about the people who are using the guns? Are they mentally ill?...
by Thomas Byers5 years ago
Would You Give Up Your Guns To Protect American Children?Other than guns for hunting and pistols for protection would you have a problem with giving up all military style weapons to protect the children of America. Is...
by Mazzy Bolero4 years ago
Considering the number of innocent people killed by gunmen, isn't it time guns were banned?The recent murders at the movie premiere were in a long line of multiple murders by gunmen - some occurring in schools. ...
by Jeff Berndt5 years ago
I just noticed something about the Fast and Furious controversy.Leaving aside the question of whether the operation was a good idea or not (I think not), I noticed that the Left and the Right have both seemed to...
by Debra Allen5 years ago
What purpose was the first gun made?I am not talking about rifles to kill for diner or meat, but the ones that were made to kill people. Were they made to kill people at all in the first place?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.