Isn't the term "global warming" a lame expression? Isn't more like 'escalating v

  1. ptosis profile image71
    ptosisposted 4 years ago

    Isn't the term "global warming" a lame expression? Isn't more like 'escalating vacillation' or

    'disequilibrium intensification'?  For the last 10 thousand years the Earth as experienced an unusual relative 'calm' weather.  Is this the reason for the human population explosion or as some have suggested that human agriculture was the 'calming' effect?

    https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/8629617_f260.jpg

  2. Attikos profile image79
    Attikosposted 4 years ago

    No, no, no, it's not "global warming" anymore, it's "climate change." It doesn't matter if it gets warmer, or colder, or if as it is every year the weather is the worst in living memory, it's the change itself. Unless it stays exactly the same as it is, preferably exactly the same as it was when the enviromaniac talking at the moment was slipping into a state of arrested adolescence during the halcyon days of summer when his hormones were starting to kick in with a vengeance, it's irrefutable proof that man-made climate change is destroying the world and must be stopped by giving him and people like him total control of everything. You have to get with the program here, ptosis.

    1. Ericdierker profile image51
      Ericdierkerposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Now who in the heck is going to siphon off billions of UN and US money for such silly names. Even "climate change" has no gravitas!

Closed to reply
 
working