Is science now starting to prove God's existence?
(CNSNews.com) -- Dr. Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist at the City College of New York (CUNY) and co-founder of String Field Theory, says theoretical particles known as “primitive semi-radius tachyons” are physical evidence that the universe was created by a higher intelligence.
First thought is that things are rather the other way around for God does not need anyone or anything to prove Himself, He's already done it. However, it might be better put to say that science confirms what God says. Human theory abounds, but the facts don't change.
It will be interesting to see how many atheists will now fess up to being reborn believers
The thing is, agreeing (believing) that there is a God does not make a person a born-again believer.
If science proves there is a God then any reasonable atheist would have to become a "believer" (by anyone's definition)
Check out the book "The Science of God" by Gerald Schroeder. You will be convinced...
Check out the history of the world. Nothing has changed since recorded history. People are evil and doing the same evil acts as they did in the beginning. I have done my research,the truth is what you see today. There is no God while there may b
Brad, you inspired me to create a new hub this morning...
Check out "How Lucky are We?"
You are not going to be happy with my hub comments. I have a brain, and I exercise it to question anything and everything. What else is an intelligent brain supposed to be used for? I don't rule out creator, but I do rule out the biblical God
Just curious, what does your brain tell you about the miracle at Fatima for example?
Fatima is just another fable. Where is it today when we need it?
If you read the first hand account of Fatima, you will be shocked. It was not a fable or mass delusion as some have postulated. Also, the predictions made, or revealed to the 3 children, came true as history has shown...
The bottom line is what we see today, and we haven't any new information.
The sun did not really dance in the sky.
But Science cannot explain the events of that day miracle of the sun. That is why it is a supernatural event. God chooses to perform these events as needed. I do believe personally, that our current situation in the US is due to our rejection of God.
With all due respect, God, if there is one should be doing much more beneficial deeds than game playing with the Sun? How about coming out and taking a presence. Man has shown that he will continue doing what he has been doing, that is not good.
You keep using the "Blame God Paradox" to justify your so called arguments. It's non sequitur bro. It's a dead parrot. It "don't work" to blame a supposedly non existent God. Get it yet??
I gave my answers in Jack's hub
So add your name to Jack&DTMB as those that don't have any answers to my comments. My comments are specific. Read them& try to come up with a comment on them specifically. bibles are not self authentic
Brad, I just replied to all your points... I will be glad to answer any specific questions that you may have. I may not have all the answers but I have studied over the past 20 years and learned from scholars, clergy, fellow Christians...
You're avoiding the point: you are blaming an allegedly non existent God! There's no logic in that. I think you're now starting to "get it" but perhaps feel understandably foolish. Come to grips with it soon.
Not even close. I think it would make more sense for science to work up to that lofty ability by curing cancer, the common cold, diabetes, heart disease, and a myriad of other things before tackling the job of determining whether or not God exists.
I have written an article (hub) on this subject and I invite you to read it. I do not promote religion in my article even slightly, so no one needs to worry I will try to indoctrinate them.
My hub: Can Science Prove God Exists or Does Not Exist? -- Did you know? There Is No Such Thing As Gravity
Ok. In the meantime here is yet another proof of God:
http://hubpages.com/religion-philosophy … telligence
Also we have Kurt Godel's (Einsteins anointed successor) God Theorem or his ontological proof turned into math.
Science has disproved most creation theories and religious texts beyond stories of battles, lineage, person X founded that town. The only one that remains is what caused the Big Bang.
Science does not replace religion as a guide for how to live, because only belief systems tell you how to best live your life with other people. And science doesn't provide a WHY for our lives, which religion does.
Not really enough to go on, but I'm sure if he had something mainstream scientists would jump on it.
Still doesn't tell us how many Gods, or which ones in particular.
Look the when the science emprove that doesnot mean that the people can do every thing but this mean that the allah want that
WHY ARE WE DEPENDENT UPON SCIENCE? WHEN THE HOLY BOOK(QURAN) HAVE GIVEN A CLEAR ANSWER ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF GOD.
Have had this discussion many times and in many ways. My conclusion? Science is designed to explain the physical world. Faith is an attempt to explain the spiritual world. They are two different things. I've done articles on "Scientific Ghost Hunters." They go to haunted sites and use scientific methods to understand what they find. One group had people with PhD's in science. I've spent time with them. There are things that happen at these sites they don't understand and can't explain. It's a field that also attracts a lot of scam artists. I don't think the scientific world can explain the spiritual world. I don't think the spiritual world has anything to do with science. They can't prove or disprove one another. I consider them to be two separate things. When it comes to death, science thinks it is the end of a person, and it is the end of a person's physical abilities in this world. Many people with faith believe death is just the beginning. The only thing both can agree on is we will all find out what happens after death some day.
by Obscure_Treasures 7 years ago
In this advanced era Science has been able to invent new things....bt a above mentioned question still remains on back of my mind...
by wordscribe41 9 years ago
The following post is in response to a statement made by another hubber and the many posts I've read using logical fallacies:"the burden of proof" is NOT on the believers. There is no burden to prove He exists because it is by FAITH that we believe. It is by faith we called on to believe....
by preacherdon 7 years ago
There are many who are atheist and agnostic because they either don't know or don't believe God exists. Creation tells us that God exists but atheist explain Him away with evolution and Big Bangs. So, my question is, how can God prove Himself to the point where there would be no doubt? The Book of...
by Mahaveer Sanglikar 20 months ago
Many believers like to say that Atheists should prove that there is no God. Believers should know that existence has to be proved, not the non-existence. If a thing exists, it is possible to prove its existence. So believers should prove the existence of God if he exists. But if they want to do it,...
by Apostle Jack 7 years ago
Atheist say that they can't prove that God do not exist,so.......that make them just as ignorant about the matter as those that they say can't prove that He does.That is a clear view of the Pot calling the kettle black.Do you agree.There is more proof that He does exist than He doesn't.They don't...
by PhoenixV 2 years ago
Can You Prove God Exists?What are your arguments for an existing God?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|