Is science now starting to prove God's existence?

1. 74

   Oztinatoposted 8 years ago

   Is science now starting to prove God's existence?
   
   
   (CNSNews.com) -- Dr. Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist at the City College of New York (CUNY) and co-founder of String Field Theory, says theoretical particles known as “primitive semi-radius tachyons” are physical evidence that the universe was created by a higher intelligence.
   
   

   replyreport
2. 0

   RTalloniposted 8 years ago

   First thought is that things are rather the other way around for God does not need anyone or anything to prove Himself, He's already done it.  However, it might be better put to say that science confirms what God says.  Human theory abounds, but the facts don't change.

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I agree.
      It will be interesting to see how many atheists will now fess up to being reborn believers

      replyreport
   2. 0

      RTalloniposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      The thing is, agreeing (believing) that there is a God does not make a person a born-again believer.

      replyreport
   3. 74

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      If science proves there is a God then any reasonable atheist would have to become a "believer" (by anyone's definition)

      replyreport
3. 76

   jackclee lmposted 8 years ago

   Check out the book "The Science of  God" by Gerald Schroeder. You will be convinced...

   replyreport
   1. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Jack
      Check out the history of the world. Nothing has changed since recorded history. People are evil and doing the same evil acts as they did in the beginning. I have done my research,the truth is what you see today. There is no God while there may b

      replyreport
   2. 76

      jackclee lmposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Brad, you inspired me to create a new hub this morning...
      Check out "How Lucky are We?"

      replyreport
   3. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Jack
      Glad I inspired you.

      replyreport
   4. 76

      jackclee lmposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I hope you learned something.

      replyreport
   5. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Jack
      You are not going to be happy with my hub comments. I have a brain, and I exercise it to question anything and everything. What else is an intelligent brain supposed to be used for? I don't rule out creator, but I do rule out the biblical God

      replyreport
   6. 76

      jackclee lmposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Just curious, what does your brain tell you about the miracle at Fatima for example?

      replyreport
   7. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Jack
      Fatima is just another fable. Where is it today when we need it?

      replyreport
   8. 76

      jackclee lmposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      If you read the first hand account of Fatima, you will be shocked. It was not a fable or mass delusion as some have postulated. Also, the predictions made, or revealed to the 3 children, came true as history has shown...

      replyreport
   9. 50

      bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Jack
      The bottom line is what we see today, and we haven't any new information.
      The sun did not really dance in the sky.

      replyreport
   10. 76

       jackclee lmposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       But Science cannot explain the events of that day miracle of the sun. That is why it is a supernatural event. God chooses to perform these events as needed. I do believe personally, that our current situation in the US is due to our rejection of God.

       replyreport
   11. 50

       bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       Jack
       With all due respect, God, if there is one should be doing much more beneficial deeds than game playing with the Sun? How about coming out and taking a presence. Man has shown that he will continue doing what he has been doing, that is not good.

       replyreport
   12. 74

       Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       Brad
       You keep using the "Blame God Paradox" to justify your so called arguments. It's non sequitur bro. It's a dead parrot. It "don't work" to blame a supposedly non existent God.  Get it yet??

       replyreport
   13. 50

       bradmasterOCcalposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       Orzinato
       I gave my answers in Jack's hub
       So add your name to Jack&DTMB as those that don't have any answers to my comments. My comments are specific. Read them& try to come up with a comment on them specifically. bibles are not self authentic

       replyreport
   14. 76

       jackclee lmposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       Brad, I just replied to all your points... I will be glad to answer any specific questions that you may have. I may not have all the answers but I have studied over the past 20 years and learned from scholars, clergy, fellow Christians...

       replyreport
   15. 74

       Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

       Brad
       You're avoiding the point: you are blaming an allegedly non existent God! There's no logic in that. I think you're now starting to "get it" but perhaps feel understandably foolish. Come to grips with it soon.

       replyreport
4. 82

   Au faitposted 8 years ago

   Not even close.  I think it would make more sense for science to work up to that lofty ability by curing cancer, the common cold, diabetes, heart disease, and a myriad of other things before tackling the job of determining whether or not God exists.
   
   I have written an article (hub) on this subject and I invite you to read it.  I do not promote religion in my article even slightly, so no one needs to worry I will try to indoctrinate them.
   
   My hub:  Can Science Prove God Exists or Does Not Exist? -- Did you know? There Is No Such Thing As Gravity

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Ok. In the meantime here is yet another proof of God:
      http://hubpages.com/religion-philosophy … telligence
      
      Also we have Kurt Godel's (Einsteins anointed successor) God Theorem or his ontological proof turned into math.

      replyreport
5. 84

   tamarawilhiteposted 8 years ago

   Science has disproved most creation theories and religious texts beyond stories of battles, lineage, person X founded that town. The only one that remains is what caused the Big Bang.
   
   Science does not replace religion as a guide for how to live, because only belief systems tell you how to best live your life with other people. And science doesn't provide a WHY for our lives, which religion does.

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      So what are you thoughts about Dr Kaku's comments regarding how science is now proving God exists?

      replyreport
6. 83

   WiccanSageposted 8 years ago

   Not really enough to go on, but I'm sure if he had something mainstream scientists would jump on it.
   
   Still doesn't tell us how many Gods, or which ones in particular.

   replyreport
7. 53

   Mekkawyposted 8 years ago

   Look the when the science emprove that doesnot mean that the people can do every thing but this mean that the allah want that

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Just because science advances this does not imply humanity can do whatever it likes. It simply means God allows us to discover more.

      replyreport
8. 52

   Education pointposted 8 years ago

   WHY ARE WE DEPENDENT UPON SCIENCE? WHEN THE HOLY BOOK(QURAN) HAVE GIVEN A CLEAR ANSWER ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF GOD.

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      "We" are not dependent on science.
      My question is aimed at the scientific community.

      replyreport
9. 94

   Readmikenowposted 8 years ago

   Have had this discussion many times and in many ways.  My conclusion?  Science is designed  to explain the physical world.  Faith is an attempt to explain the spiritual world.  They are two different things.  I've done articles on "Scientific Ghost Hunters."  They go to haunted sites and use scientific methods to understand what they find.  One group had people with PhD's in science.  I've spent time with them.  There are things that happen at these sites they don't understand and can't explain. It's a field that also attracts a lot of scam artists.  I don't think the scientific world can explain the spiritual world.  I don't think the spiritual world has anything to do with science.  They can't prove or disprove one another. I consider them to be two separate things.  When it comes to death, science thinks it is the end of a person, and it is the end of a person's physical abilities in this world.  Many people with faith believe death is just the beginning.  The only thing both can agree on is we will all find out what happens after death some day.

   replyreport
   1. 74

      Oztinatoposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Nevertheless the current scientific trends are taking a new spiritual twist as new research astounds even the atheist.

      replyreport