Buildings have a major impact on the environment over their entire life cycle. Responsible for 40% of worldwide energy flow and material use, conventional buildings have been identified as the largest source of green-house gas emissions, even more than that of the transport and industry sector. They affect urban air quality and contribute to climate change. They are also hazardous to health at times. During their lifecycle, conventional buildings harm the environment in many ways.
Resources such as ground cover, forests, water, and energy are depleted to give way to buildings. Indiscriminate use of building material without giving a thought to the environment.
Most of the building material is sourced from great distances adding to their carbon commute. Building design and landscaping is such that the building uses water and its landscape need pesticide during its lifetime.
These buildings have energy-consuming systems for lighting, space conditioning, water heating and hi-tech controls to add to the comfort and convenience of the occupants.
No system for recycling water and waste management.
Poor indoor air-quality.
However, buildings also offer the cheapest way to reduce carbon footprint. As awareness spreads, conscious consumers are increasingly demanding environment friendly, energy-efficient homes.
More information can be found at: http://www.copperwiki.org/index.php/Green_Building
Excellent, excellent. It would be spectacular if we could convert to energy-efficient buildings. The only problem is the cost of conversion, although they will eventually pay for themselves. This is called a J-Curve, and it rarely ever happens in politics.
Politicians mainly act in order to get re-elected, because they have a pretty cushy job. So if policy's great, but will initially cost a lot, very few politicians are willing to do so. If you elect some guy into office and he spends all the money in the city coffers, he's gone next election cycle. Now that money he invested turns around and people see the benefits, but his successor gets all the credit. J-Curves and policy, rarely seen.
It's unfortunate. We see and put to use J-Curve mentality in our daily lives, but when people come together as a voting public they rarely have a mind for it. I think it's because we see a new politician as a change, and when we don't immediately get that change we get resentful. Combine this with the very low turnover rate of incumbent politicians and the bigger picture remains relatively unchanged. It is my hope that this election has awaken something in the American people... once every generation or so a shift like this comes about, and there's a giant leap in progress. Hopefully we're due, and hopefully that means we'll get some eco-friendly buildings built!
Imagine how much money we could spend on teachers and classrooms when a large percentage of it's not going towards heat and electricity.
We should all build underground homes. Then we'd all have yards.
by retief2000 4 years ago
Obama's wars for oil, is this just the latest?Libya, Yemen and now Iraq/Syria - is this just the latest war for oil that Obama is waging? Libyan oil supplies Italy and France, the war there was to protect that flow. Obama destroyed Qaddafi just to replace him with something worse. Is Syria next and...
by India Arnold 6 years ago
What makes "hempcrete" a better home building material than traditional concrete?I recently read that hempcrete makes an excellent building material, in that it is more energy efficient than concrete. It is also said to be mildew resistance, termite resistant, and is a better sound...
by Jason Menayan 7 years ago
Green building trends - how to make a new building more energy-efficient
by Faith Reaper 4 years ago
I say America, as that is where I live, and I do not know how things are down around the world. However, I was driving through the city in which I work and noticing how many huge abandoned buildings there are, or buildings that just cannot sell due to that part of the city is not thriving...
by Jordan Hemmann 7 years ago
Name one person that you think has made a major impact on the world, good or bad. How different...do you think the world would be today if that person had never existed?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|