There is a debate in mathematics and the philosophy of mathematics as to what the best foundation for mathematics should be, or even if their should be one. The usual suggestions are those mentioned in the subject line thought they are certainly not the only options.
I am merely curious what people (especially mathematicians) have to say about this.
I think I'd be of the persuasion that says no particular theory should be considered "foundational" to mathematics. In my opinion, they are just different faces of the same multifaceted coin (maybe there's a theorem involving a coin with more than two sides in there somewhere?).
Really, I can't say, though. I'd certainly be interested to know what you think. It's not a topic I've previously put a great deal of thought into, so if you have insight... well, please share!
I agree. I do not think there should be a foundation in this sense, though many people do. I do however think that metaphysical and epistemological foundations are needed. Perhaps I'll write a hub on mathematical foundations one of these days, it's something I've researched a fair amount, though the details escape me at the moment.
by Tony Lawrence7 years ago
A theist asked me to start a separate thread for this. I refused at first, but then I thought "why not?"Let's understand first that I am not against religion per se. I believe it can help some people. I do not...
by alexandriaruthk5 years ago
How can you use logic to justify the existence of God?Or it just boils down to faith?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.