Believer's Funny Logic

1. 69

   jainismusposted 12 years ago

   
   If 2+2 is four, not 3 or 5, the God exists.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I don't follow, try using syntax and a logical premise.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      Sooner28posted 12 years agoin reply to this

      As a free thinker who thinks most religion is useless, except for controlling people, I don't know what you are arguing.  Could you expand?

      replyreport
   3. 60

      EinderDarkwolfposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Haha, that's a good one! For those who don't get it, the standard logic of a believer, is that no matter what happened, and no matter what you show, God did it. Doesn't matter that the big bang happened and is perfectly explainable, God's the reason for it, though science shows a lack of need for God in order for it to happen.
      
      Anyway, good one, I needed a laugh.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         Actually, science has no idea how it could happen, and no current theory for how it happened. Big Bang Theory doesn't address the specifics of the singularity, where it came from, what started it expanding, etc... Big Bang Theory starts at the moment of expansion.

         replyreport
         1. 72

            Cagsilposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            Isn't the singularity a completely random event? Just curious.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               Nobody knows and the BBT doesn't address the 'cause' of the singularity.

               replyreport
         2. 60

            EinderDarkwolfposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            Perhaps you need to study more to realize how much a lie that is. They can't say with absolute certainty that the big bang caused everything, but like everything else they "explain" it is the most plausible theory.

            replyreport
            1. 73

               jacharlessposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               Yup, exactly why science is a religion too. Now, we're gettin` somewhere.
               James

               replyreport
            2. 0

               JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this

               That's not what I said. I didn't say it isn't the most likely theory. I said BBT doesn't address what caused the Big Bang.

               replyreport
               1. 60

                  mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                  Why does it need a cause? It's going too far back for me to care... So why does anyone else? Because the need to understand, outweighs the need to exist.

                  replyreport
                  1. 0

                     JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                     It needs a cause, scientifically, because every event has a cause.
                     
                     My point was that Big Bang Theory isn't mutually exclusive with belief in God.

                     replyreport
                     1. 60

                        mischeviousmeposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                        True, there's really no difference, just the convayance of the idea...

                        replyreport
   4. 0

      JaxsonRaineposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      It's really irrelevant.
      
      If God exists, truth is truth because it is.
      
      If not, truth is truth because it is.

      replyreport
   5. 78

      Chris Nealposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Okay, even after reading EinderDarkwolf's explanation, I'm a little stumped.
      
      Nonetheless, why would it not be logical that God would create a world with a logical set of rules that we humans need to adhere to? Thus, 2+2=4. Humans need oxygen. What goes up, must come down. E=MC2.
      
      The fact that He himself has been known to bend those rules does not in and of itself prove that He doesn't exist. The Big Bang is perfectly consistant with Genesis.
      
      If humans could force 2+2 = 5, then that would be clearer proof that God does not exist.

      replyreport
      1. 72

         Cagsilposted 12 years agoin reply to this

         

         replyreport
         1. 78

            Chris Nealposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            Those who can, do.
            
            Those who can't, teach.
            
            Those who can't teach, laugh.

            replyreport
2. 64

   SandyMcCollumposted 12 years ago

   Yes, what is your point? You have my attention now.

   replyreport
3. 60

   Repairguy47posted 12 years ago

   Math God?

   replyreport
4. 73

   jacharlessposted 12 years ago

   (neutral)2, (positive)2 is equal to 4.
   Hmm, okay, four units of two properties, yes.
   So, where's the argument or logic?
   
   z= ?
   
   
   (negative)4, (positive)4 is equal to 8 or equal to 0?

   replyreport
5. 75

   Shanna11posted 12 years ago

   The profoundness of this thread is dazzling. My mind has been pushed to its most possible capacities, and still, it cannot manage to comprehend the sheer velocity of overwhelming wisdom and understanding that this single sentence seeks to bestow upon it's quivering corners.

   replyreport
   1. 72

      Cagsilposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      

      replyreport
6. 60

   MelissaBarrettposted 12 years ago

   I think the real evidence of God would be the presentation of an acceptable answer as to WHY 2+2=4.

   replyreport
   1. 72

      Cagsilposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Cause humans created math.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         Sooner28posted 12 years agoin reply to this

         We did.  Didn't you get the memo?

         replyreport