jump to last post 1-3 of 3 discussions (5 posts)

Should harmful images be outlawed from public display?

  1. andrew savage profile image60
    andrew savageposted 4 years ago

    Should harmful images be outlawed from public display?

    I believe that in order to protect the psyches of the innocent that they must be outlawed. Example: images of war.

  2. CraftytotheCore profile image83
    CraftytotheCoreposted 4 years ago

    That's interesting. When you say "public display", does that include the internet, museums, movies?  Wouldn't that be considered censorship?

    I remember in school we learned about some disturbing historical matters and the images still haunt me.  I wish I hadn't seen those images.

  3. profile image57
    Fuginagasakiposted 4 years ago

    I understand what you are saying, but the truth is they are there and today anything can be found. Video games alone have become far more violent and pornographic and many T.V. shows allow things that I personally feel are to much for children to see. The world is changing and children are told to grow up faster. Also who would decide what can be seen and cant I may consider a simple fight seen too violent while the other family considers organs spewing out a victim the cut off.  The easiest answer is just set up controls on the T.V. and watch your kids closley

    1. andrew savage profile image60
      andrew savageposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I believe that censorship is vital to the protection of the stability of each member of society's psyche.

    2. profile image57
      Fuginagasakiposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, I agree that some things should be censored, but who would control what and how much. Just because I feel that a women in a bikini is to scandalous and sexually provocative that does not mean that a entire nation agrees.

 
working