jump to last post 1-14 of 14 discussions (28 posts)

titanic

  1. Stevennix2001 profile image91
    Stevennix2001posted 6 years ago

    In recent news, James Cameron has decided to re-release his "Titanic" film in 3-D this time in 2012.  Won't that be fun?  big_smile  What are you're thoughts?  good idea?  bad idea?  or just don't care?  please share your thoughts. big_smile

    right now, im betting james cameron is saying..."I'M KING OF THE WORLD!"

    1. lmfryett profile image58
      lmfryettposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Ok.  I liked Titanic, but do we really need it in 3D?  Come on!  Movie tickets are expensive enough these days without adding the cost of 3D.  Besides, I'm not a big 3D movie fan anyways.  They give me migraines and sometimes a little motion sick!  So many movies are in 3D anymore that those of of that have "issues" with seeing them are getting limited choices on what we can see!

      1. Stevennix2001 profile image91
        Stevennix2001posted 6 years agoin reply to this

        Yeah, I couldn't agree more.  I think the main reasons why all these films are being re-released in 3-D is because of the innovation of 3-D tvs and due to the success of "Avatar."  By re-releasing them in 3-D, they can can re-release the DVDs in 3-D to make even more money in addition to the box office numbers.  At least, that's what George Lucas claims when he made an announcement earlier to re-release his entire "Star Wars" movies in 3-D as well. 

        However, I don't know why so many films need to be in 3-D anyway.  I mean it's great every once in a while, when taken in small doses.  However, if you constantly watch them, then they tend to hurt you're eyes after while.  At least for me anyways.

  2. Cagsil profile image60
    Cagsilposted 6 years ago

    Rehashing same movies. This is getting absurd. How dumb do they think the public is?

    I mean, it's just getting pathetic. I haven't been in a movie theater in years and refuse to visit one for any movie. I wait for it to become available outside and then get it, and no I don't rent them or buy them. I download them.

    Unbelievable. hmm

    1. Stevennix2001 profile image91
      Stevennix2001posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      I couldn't agree more. I think it's getting kind of pathetic with the 3-D craze these days. I don't mind re-releases of films every once in a blue moon, but this is just sad to try and force people to pay a few extra bucks to see a film they've already seen.  Plus, I don't see why Cameron needs to have this film in 3-D, as it doesn't need it.  The story was already memorable to enough to stand on it's own without it.

      I just hope this isn't a trend where they start re-releasing every old film in 3-D.  Who knows at the rate they're going, we might end up seeing the re-release of the original "Wizard of Oz" in 3-D.

      1. Cagsil profile image60
        Cagsilposted 6 years agoin reply to this

        Better yet, watch out for the silent movies genre coming back, like Charlie Chaplin and making it 3-D. lol lol

        1. Stevennix2001 profile image91
          Stevennix2001posted 6 years agoin reply to this

          lol I hope not.  Don't get me wrong, I like silent films.  However, if Hollywood does keep re-releasing films in 3-D like this, I think I'll just stop watching movies altogether, as this is getting ridiculous.  lol

          1. Cagsil profile image60
            Cagsilposted 6 years agoin reply to this

            cool

    2. Hokey profile image60
      Hokeyposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Download, Download, Download!!!! YAY!!!!!!

                            big_smile

      I dont go to the movies either. Also I definately wouldnt go to see the same movie again and pay those crazy prices, deal with crowds, and all the other assorted craziness. Rehashing the same movies? Nope. No good. hmm

      1. Cagsil profile image60
        Cagsilposted 6 years agoin reply to this

        Nice to see we're on the same page. tongue

  3. Stevennix2001 profile image91
    Stevennix2001posted 6 years ago

    bumps

  4. optimus grimlock profile image59
    optimus grimlockposted 6 years ago

    cool we get to see someones head crashing into the boat, wait they wont add blood. hmmm remake the movie from where they saw the iceberg, takeout the love storey, show bloody death and make it 90 minutes and you got a great movie!!!!

    1. Stevennix2001 profile image91
      Stevennix2001posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      lol

  5. camlo profile image88
    camloposted 6 years ago

    A good idea to mark 100 years since the Titanic sank. It will be spectacular in 3D.

  6. Ivorwen profile image74
    Ivorwenposted 6 years ago

    I couldn't care less.  We tossed our copy of Titanic several years ago and have never missed it.

    1. Cagsil profile image60
      Cagsilposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      lol lol

  7. Mighty Mom profile image86
    Mighty Momposted 6 years ago

    Oh Gawd.
    Does that mean Celine Dion's voice will also be in 3D?

    1. Diki Bird profile image74
      Diki Birdposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      lol

    2. camlo profile image88
      camloposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Hopefully not - what a horrible thought ...

  8. Bellamie profile image57
    Bellamieposted 6 years ago

    We don't need this one in 3-D, unless they take out 75% of the "Jack! Jack! Jack!" and "Rose! Rose! Rose!"

  9. andromida profile image63
    andromidaposted 6 years ago

    Not a good idea at all.I would love to see a few more sequel of Avatar.

  10. ChristineVianello profile image61
    ChristineVianelloposted 6 years ago

    Um....this news just made my day. That is my favorite movie. Some hate it, but it is the best. smile

  11. Tina Kachan profile image62
    Tina Kachanposted 6 years ago

    Titanic was a hit, why can`t they just leave it at that..?

    But nooooo...it`s either about making money or running out of ideas.

    Besides, I cried like a baby watching Titanic. No need for repeating all that in 3D tongue

    1. Stevennix2001 profile image91
      Stevennix2001posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah I don't disagree. "Titanic" is already a great film without the 3-D aspect to it.  I don't see why it would need it.  I mean "Back to the future" was re-released in theaters too I think sometime last year, but it wasn't released in 3-D, so what gives?  oh well, i guess cameron is starting to think too much like george lucas these days.

  12. KCC Big Country profile image88
    KCC Big Countryposted 6 years ago

    Titanic is a personal favorite for me.....but even I don't care to see it in 3D.  It's just not necessary.

    1. Stevennix2001 profile image91
      Stevennix2001posted 6 years agoin reply to this

      yeah, i agree with you there.

  13. 2uesday profile image84
    2uesdayposted 6 years ago

    I will not watch it, as I know the ending. smile

  14. KAYKAYKAYLA profile image36
    KAYKAYKAYLAposted 6 years ago

    I totally agree with you I mean I don't get the whole 3D anyway. So, the whole Titanic thing in 3D is kind of pushing it,

 
working