Jump to Last Post 1-14 of 14 discussions (28 posts)
  1. profile image0
    Stevennix2001posted 13 years ago

    In recent news, James Cameron has decided to re-release his "Titanic" film in 3-D this time in 2012.  Won't that be fun?  big_smile  What are you're thoughts?  good idea?  bad idea?  or just don't care?  please share your thoughts. big_smile

    right now, im betting james cameron is saying..."I'M KING OF THE WORLD!"

    1. lmfryett profile image61
      lmfryettposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Ok.  I liked Titanic, but do we really need it in 3D?  Come on!  Movie tickets are expensive enough these days without adding the cost of 3D.  Besides, I'm not a big 3D movie fan anyways.  They give me migraines and sometimes a little motion sick!  So many movies are in 3D anymore that those of of that have "issues" with seeing them are getting limited choices on what we can see!

      1. profile image0
        Stevennix2001posted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Yeah, I couldn't agree more.  I think the main reasons why all these films are being re-released in 3-D is because of the innovation of 3-D tvs and due to the success of "Avatar."  By re-releasing them in 3-D, they can can re-release the DVDs in 3-D to make even more money in addition to the box office numbers.  At least, that's what George Lucas claims when he made an announcement earlier to re-release his entire "Star Wars" movies in 3-D as well. 

        However, I don't know why so many films need to be in 3-D anyway.  I mean it's great every once in a while, when taken in small doses.  However, if you constantly watch them, then they tend to hurt you're eyes after while.  At least for me anyways.

  2. Cagsil profile image70
    Cagsilposted 13 years ago

    Rehashing same movies. This is getting absurd. How dumb do they think the public is?

    I mean, it's just getting pathetic. I haven't been in a movie theater in years and refuse to visit one for any movie. I wait for it to become available outside and then get it, and no I don't rent them or buy them. I download them.

    Unbelievable. hmm

    1. profile image0
      Stevennix2001posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      I couldn't agree more. I think it's getting kind of pathetic with the 3-D craze these days. I don't mind re-releases of films every once in a blue moon, but this is just sad to try and force people to pay a few extra bucks to see a film they've already seen.  Plus, I don't see why Cameron needs to have this film in 3-D, as it doesn't need it.  The story was already memorable to enough to stand on it's own without it.

      I just hope this isn't a trend where they start re-releasing every old film in 3-D.  Who knows at the rate they're going, we might end up seeing the re-release of the original "Wizard of Oz" in 3-D.

      1. Cagsil profile image70
        Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Better yet, watch out for the silent movies genre coming back, like Charlie Chaplin and making it 3-D. lol lol

        1. profile image0
          Stevennix2001posted 13 years agoin reply to this

          lol I hope not.  Don't get me wrong, I like silent films.  However, if Hollywood does keep re-releasing films in 3-D like this, I think I'll just stop watching movies altogether, as this is getting ridiculous.  lol

          1. Cagsil profile image70
            Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this


    2. Hokey profile image60
      Hokeyposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Download, Download, Download!!!! YAY!!!!!!


      I dont go to the movies either. Also I definately wouldnt go to see the same movie again and pay those crazy prices, deal with crowds, and all the other assorted craziness. Rehashing the same movies? Nope. No good. hmm

      1. Cagsil profile image70
        Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

        Nice to see we're on the same page. tongue

  3. profile image0
    Stevennix2001posted 13 years ago


  4. optimus grimlock profile image60
    optimus grimlockposted 13 years ago

    cool we get to see someones head crashing into the boat, wait they wont add blood. hmmm remake the movie from where they saw the iceberg, takeout the love storey, show bloody death and make it 90 minutes and you got a great movie!!!!

    1. profile image0
      Stevennix2001posted 13 years agoin reply to this


  5. camlo profile image84
    camloposted 13 years ago

    A good idea to mark 100 years since the Titanic sank. It will be spectacular in 3D.

  6. Ivorwen profile image64
    Ivorwenposted 13 years ago

    I couldn't care less.  We tossed our copy of Titanic several years ago and have never missed it.

    1. Cagsil profile image70
      Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      lol lol

  7. Mighty Mom profile image76
    Mighty Momposted 13 years ago

    Oh Gawd.
    Does that mean Celine Dion's voice will also be in 3D?

    1. Diki Bird profile image62
      Diki Birdposted 13 years agoin reply to this


    2. camlo profile image84
      camloposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Hopefully not - what a horrible thought ...

  8. Bellamie profile image61
    Bellamieposted 13 years ago

    We don't need this one in 3-D, unless they take out 75% of the "Jack! Jack! Jack!" and "Rose! Rose! Rose!"

  9. andromida profile image55
    andromidaposted 13 years ago

    Not a good idea at all.I would love to see a few more sequel of Avatar.

  10. ChristineVianello profile image60
    ChristineVianelloposted 13 years ago

    Um....this news just made my day. That is my favorite movie. Some hate it, but it is the best. smile

  11. Tina Kachan profile image61
    Tina Kachanposted 13 years ago

    Titanic was a hit, why can`t they just leave it at that..?

    But nooooo...it`s either about making money or running out of ideas.

    Besides, I cried like a baby watching Titanic. No need for repeating all that in 3D tongue

    1. profile image0
      Stevennix2001posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah I don't disagree. "Titanic" is already a great film without the 3-D aspect to it.  I don't see why it would need it.  I mean "Back to the future" was re-released in theaters too I think sometime last year, but it wasn't released in 3-D, so what gives?  oh well, i guess cameron is starting to think too much like george lucas these days.

  12. KCC Big Country profile image84
    KCC Big Countryposted 13 years ago

    Titanic is a personal favorite for me.....but even I don't care to see it in 3D.  It's just not necessary.

    1. profile image0
      Stevennix2001posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      yeah, i agree with you there.

  13. 2uesday profile image64
    2uesdayposted 13 years ago

    I will not watch it, as I know the ending. smile

  14. KAYKAYKAYLA profile image39
    KAYKAYKAYLAposted 13 years ago

    I totally agree with you I mean I don't get the whole 3D anyway. So, the whole Titanic thing in 3D is kind of pushing it,


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)