We've just heard Lars von Trier make some outrageous claim about sympathising with Hitler. Polanski has also got away with seducing under age girls. Carravagio was a blatant peodophile, and yet all is forgiven because they are great artists. Is this ok?
Hell no. If you ask me, they should all be dragged out in the middle of the street and shot if I had my way with them. However, you can't deny how great they both are at their perspective visionary crafts.
Well Oscar Wilde was given a pretty tough time for having a relationship with a schoolboy when he had a wife and 5 children. People still talk of Wilde as a gay martyr; a victim. Would people feel the same if Wilde had been a green grocer or a head master instead of a brilliant writer I wonder?
I honestly don't know, and more than likely don't care what the majority of America thinks, as this country was bought and paid for a long time ago. Not only that, but people are always going to believe whatever the hell they want. Or to be more specifically, they believe whoever they deem to be a reliable source of information; regardless of the facts proving otherwise.
The 'boy' was a 22 year old man I seem to remember, and the persecution of Wilde arose partly from the pressure of the young man's father in a society where being gay was a prison offence.
To me, they ae just people, subject to the same laws as anyone else. But then we have hollywood where noone appears to get punished for anyhing. I guess there will always be the Do As I Wanters.
But doesn't that apply to more than just genius - say popular or icon of any type?
Those examples given remind me of lots of people I know in real life. LOL! WHat is to say lots of people don't get similar fancy notions? Idi Amin managed to terrorise a whole nation and he was nuts, apparently. It's when they become powerful that people become afraid of them. "Ambition bites the nails of success" perhaps?
Put someone of equal "screw-looseness" in charge of running a Bank, and watch what happens? "Lehman's part 2" Maybe?
Generally, societies back nutters if society does well from their leadership. Okay, I am done...
It's funny how people assume sanity on those with wealth and power.
Okay. I guess we can chalk it up to human nature and it's quirks.
Aside from the abuse of wealth and power - artists are to some extent exempt as they are working on the fringes of knowledge and society - also looking at historical figures is fraught with misunderstanding as we forget that the views of today's society were not the views of theirs. Shelley, one of the most admired poets ever, married a 16 year old girl , quite normal at the time and not so long after girls were considered eligible for marriage at 14. In a time when it was normal to die young (Keats died at 25) it would be a reasonable practice in many ways - that is not so reasonable now.
The balance between artistic licence and pure licence is not so easy to see and different people see it differently at different times. Polanski might be considered to have stepped over to pure licence, but then what about the American Professor who advocated free love and drugs and slept with many of his students, occasionally many at the same time ?
Personally, I don't think it's ok. The law binds society together by forcing everyone to abide certain standards of conduct. The freedom of action of the rich should be circumscribed by the law to the same extent the law limits the freedom of action of the poor.
That said, I think this would be the counter-argument: If Polanski had been on the verge of curing cancer, we might be willing to overlook his conduct. It just doesn't make sense to let millions die in order to punish their would-be savior. Polanski, as a genius-artist, makes contributions of substantial, if perhaps not quite so significant or tangible, and so it is wise for us to make some concessions to enable him to continue his work. Humanity is richer because he is free to pursue his art rather than rot in a cell.
Like I said, that's the argument, I don't agree with it.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|