Bernanke Holds First Press Conference in Fed's History

1. 60

   OLYHOOCHposted 13 years ago

   Wearing a grey suit and sitting at a podium in a conference room at the Fed's C Street Annex Building, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke made history this afternoon, talking to the media for the first time in a post-FOMC meeting briefing. No other Fed chairman in the 98-year history of the nation's central bank has done this.
   
   Bernanke offered a stoic presence in a room filled with more than 50 reporters and dozens of cameras, confidently fielding more than 18 questions during the hour-long news conference.
   
   "Basically, Mr. Bernanke made no mistakes, added little to what we know but did show, at least to the public, that he understands their concerns and would do the best he could to get the economy and payrolls growing faster," wrote Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economic Advisors.
   
   Bernanke's opening remarks focused on underlining the Fed's post-meeting statement, which predicted a continued moderate improvement in the economy with slow jobs growth despite rising oil prices and continued challenges in the housing market.
   
   Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke during the Senate Banking hearing on the semiannual monetary policy report to Congress prepared by the Federal Reserve System. Fed Chair Bernanke to Hold News Conference Watch Video
     Market Reaction to Inflation Talk Watch Video
     Tuscaloosa, Ala., Mayor Weighs In on Tornado Watch Video
   He then took questions from reporters, pushing through the anticipated end time of 3 p.m.
   
   Bernanke told reporters the Federal Reserve is not, at this point, concerned that rising commodity prices are a long-term threat to the economy.
   
   "Our view is gas prices will not continue to rise at the recent pace," he said.
   
   He noted that in the medium term, futures markets have not yet shown hints that inflation will be a concern and that the recent run-up in prices are likely the result of increasing demand for oil from the developing world and concerns about supply because of the recent events unfolding in the Middle East and North Africa.
   
   Bernanke also fielded a question about the recent S&P notice that the U.S. could face a ratings downgrade for government-issued securities if the nation's budget problems are not addressed. Bernanke said that the credit rating agency's actions might be a good thing in that it could prompt the Obama administration and Congress to deal with the long-term fiscal problems the government faces.
   
   "It's the most important economic problem, at least in the longer term, that the U.S. faces," Bernanke said, adding that recent spending cuts pushed by lawmakers have not had a negative effect on the economy.
   
   When asked about the seemingly slow national economic recovery and the Fed's downgrade of its expectations for economic growth in 2011, Bernanke said that many factors are at play.
   
   In the first three months of the year, Bernanke said, gross domestic product will be lower because of slower defense spending, weather effects and weaker exports. But those factors will be gone in the later part of the year.
   
   "Now, there are some factors there that may have a longer-term implication," he said. "For example, construction, both residential and non-residential, was very weak in the first quarter. That may have some implications going forward."
   
   http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bernanke … d=13470138

   replyreport
   1. 62

      LRCBloggerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      It was interesting to see the reactions from the press who know him personally.  They talked about how guarded and careful he was with his words.

      replyreport
   2. 60

      laneandersposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      I'm glad he said something, he didn't really give much away, and everything he stated was already fairly well known.  At least he will reassure some of the populace.

      replyreport
2. 60

   dutchman1951posted 13 years ago

   He re-assured nothing. he just proved he personaly can be a regular guy!
   
   he is continuing the buying of our own debt to finish the 6 trillion easing, and printing more money?????
   
   the Jobs are commijng back as foregin markets open a little more to make supply for their populations demands, but no significant amount of income is being returned.  just small or modiest increases and we are still running a high deficit in trade. More products coming in then going  out.
   
   Sales income has to increase for companies to grow, if they grow, the jobs follow. There are no real gains in world markets increasing demand, and we keep de-valuing the dollar to which most countries are peged at +/-1%,
   
   and, by our own QE (Quantitive easing)  lowering our dollar, we are Helping to kill their economy's also, so demand is stopping or slowing way down.
   
   in short He is keeping status quoe, and digging the hole deeper and he also feels the gas price hike is a normal seasonal spike that will retun to normal. He does not believe it is broke yet, so why change and fix it?
   
   In one way,  he is at least he is creating a calm impression that all is ok for now, and we will cross the panic bridge when and if it is necessary. and that part is probably a good thing right now as mad and paniced as people seem right now..
   
   but to me, personability don't get it when you need real world solutions and markets to open for business to create its own growth, and thus jobs.
   
   Obama is asking Companies to invest,yes.  But if you have no increased demand, why would you increase product inventory-  produce more with no sales? Thats nuts!
   
   And until we stop this ludicrist war and actualy work to help solve the Middle East and help not hinder, we will never help to stabilize those countries enough to get them to buy anything from any-one, so...
   
   no end in sight.  The reality I think, is that this is the best we will get.
   
   I'll get off my soap-box now! 

   replyreport
3. 60

   Moderndayslaveposted 13 years ago

   When will we take our country back?
   
   
   http://www.zerohedge.com/print/365866

   replyreport