Asking for Feedback: A New Representation of the Theory of Evolution

1. 0

   Rembrainposted 5 years ago

   Hi,
   I just published this hub. Any feedback is welcome.
   
   https://hubpages.com/education/A-New-Re … -Evolution

   replyreport
   1. 76

      theraggededgeposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hi there,
      
      You joined 87 minutes ago and you've published a couple of paragraphs that bear (excuse the pun) absolutely no resemblance to the title.
      
      It's a really good idea to spend at least a day or two researching a new platform so you know what is required. Click Help, top right, to navigate to the Learning Center.
      
      Just as a starter - articles should be around 1,000 words, unless you are writing a poem.
      
      Edit: I'm referring to your Bear Grylls article. I now see you have published another one.

      replyreport
      1. 0

         Rembrainposted 5 years agoin reply to this

         ??

         replyreport
      2. 0

         Rembrainposted 5 years agoin reply to this

         Here I've written an excellent and brilliant (if not luminary) article. I'm a newbie. Is this your way to guide a newbie? I'm surprised at your level of public civility.

         replyreport
         1. 76

            theraggededgeposted 5 years agoin reply to this

            Hi Sair/Das Engel,
            
            That's not an article, as well you know.
            
            "Charles Darwin saw Native Americans wandering in wonderlands for thousands of years. So he named humans were animals."
            
            Charles Darwin did not live for thousands of years. Your sentence structure is off.

            replyreport
            1. 0

               Rembrainposted 5 years agoin reply to this

               Darwin saw that, in his mental eye, that is.

               replyreport
               1. 76

                  theraggededgeposted 5 years agoin reply to this

                  Yeah... bye.

                  replyreport
                  1. 0

                     Rembrainposted 5 years agoin reply to this

                     Your level of civility is dis~gushing.

                     replyreport
2. 67

   psycheskinnerposted 5 years ago

   Troll.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      Rembrainposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      ???

      replyreport
3. 0

   Rembrainposted 5 years ago

   A New Representation of the Theory of Evolution
   .
   .
   Charles Darwin saw Native Americans wandering in wonderlands for thousands of years. So he named humans were animals.
   
   The idea of Kant was this: humans are animals, but animals are sentient. So, where does sentience come from?
   
   My idea is this: God is the head~totality of all animal, human, insects sentience/consciousness. This is what is deathless. Everything else is dependent of this.
   
   Sentience, via the complexity creativity of culture, may develop restlessness. That's why Darwin found restlessness~less Native Americans so soothing ~ because they are calm like animals.
   
   So Darwin eventually wins.
   
   God is simply a broken piece of that Monad~sentience.
   
   Atheists are actually geeks, and geeks can not accept the idea that human, animal, insect bodies weren't created by them -- but by a all-Powerful spiritual God, and even the process by which these bodies were created -- are spiritual -- and not mechanistic -- and that, too, the process transcends the rational/logical limits of an atheist's consciousness -- and they are inherently incapable of understanding the creative process by which the universe has come to be.
   
   My formula/answer:
   The universe was created by the Monad~sentience, before it as divided into parts.
   
   Before these individual parts came to be -- what that consciousness looked like, felt like -- these are moot Kantian questions -- the thing-of-itself nature of that Monad-sentience can not be known now. That knowledge is an a~priori knowledge.

   replyreport
4. 76

   theraggededgeposted 5 years ago

   https://hubpages.com/community/forum/34 … ronavirus-

   replyreport