Social Commies VS capitalist corpies

1. 60

   hinckles komaposted 14 years ago

   i had a lot of time to read for a while so just wanted to share some thoughts,
   
   If the loser Commies failed so drastically i mean reality became grim for people literally over night. Like money became worthless chaos etc. So all that was formed in the mind that was real was actually a hoax.
   
   So if that is a reality of one side of the game of earth politics then what can we face now. I mean if there is no opposition to corporate politics.
   And how long can that stand real. I mean i love America and for witch it stands but what kind of reality can we face if money work etc. becomes also not real like it is happening now.
   
   if commies went down there is was capitali corpies that had a solution but of that system fails then what do we have to follow.
   
   Do you see a global change in political policy such as maybe
   social democracy?

   replyreport
   1. 63

      mintinfoposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Socialist democracy as in China you mean. It is the inevitable next step. I see America headed that way "kicking and screaming". All the capi corpies have to do is manipulate the masses by using covert tactics driven on American pride. The auto industry and financial systems were too big to fail so there is a collaboration now. For how long, no one knows. China is the one to watch.

      replyreport
2. 63

   Mishaposted 14 years ago

   We all are heading into one huge concentration camp. See you there Koma

   replyreport
   1. 60

      hinckles komaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      way to keep positive! I hope I will be in a camp in florida at leasdt or better key west preferably ocean view if im gonna be there for a while. in NY it would suck and it is definitely not one camp  for all you are very mistaken

      replyreport
3. 63

   Mishaposted 14 years ago

   Why? Some as inmates, others as guards, but all will be there. You and me can just recall that, right?
   
   But I don't mind spending some time with you as a guard on Key West, my imagination is going wild on this

   replyreport
4. 60

   hinckles komaposted 14 years ago

   i dont know how wild it will be but alot of talking in russian for sure. and how do you figure ur the gaurd maybe im undercover here. and ill be your boss my imagination is working now.

   replyreport
5. 63

   Mishaposted 14 years ago

   Oh, we can change roles back and forth, this would be even more interesting
   
   And we will read Plato during breaks, so you finally lose you illusions about any kind of democracy

   replyreport
6. 70

   Cagsilposted 14 years ago

   Plato? The fools fool.

   replyreport
7. 63

   Mishaposted 14 years ago

   Ray, care to elaborate?

   replyreport
   1. 70

      Cagsilposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Why? Don't you know who Plato is? The student of Socrates.
      
      Plato never finished his learning, what Socrates had to teach him. Therefore, it made him the fools fool. He was more in mysticism than reality.

      replyreport
8. 63

   Mishaposted 14 years ago

   So you mean you deem Socrates a fool, and Plato a fool cause he learned from Socrates? Did you actually read some of what he wrote?

   replyreport
   1. 70

      Cagsilposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Socrates was not a fool. Plato was the fool.
      
      The reason I say that Plato is the fool's fool. Is because, he fooled himself into believing he didn't need Socrates teachings.
      
      

      replyreport
   2. 70

      Cagsilposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, I've read some of his work, while I did research on religion and mysticism.
      
      His work is filled with mysticism. He is the reason humankind, believe humans are evil at the core and must be controlled like animals.
      
      Yes, I am familiar with his work.

      replyreport
9. 63

   Mishaposted 14 years ago

   LOL You talk like Koma on the other thread. Or I have a brain damage. I guess I need more wine....

   replyreport
   1. 70

      Cagsilposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      There you go. More wine. Surely the answer.

      replyreport
10. 62

    mikelongposted 14 years ago

    Misha....I look forward to seeing you there....I wonder if they'll let us use electro-shock on one another...
    
    
    I got first!!!

    replyreport
    1. 63

       Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       That's not exactly the games I had in mind... And then I am lesbian, not gay

       replyreport
11. 87

    Will Apseposted 14 years ago

    People need to read more. China is not a social democratic country- it is an authoritarian country developing its own brand of capitalism. The influence of communism as an economic and social model is long gone. Only the name remains.
    
    Countries with a social democratic model include Sweden, Finland and to a lesser extent France and Germany. Many social democratic countries outperform anglo american style right wing economies and have better records on human rights, individual freedom, more advanced democratic controls and greater social cohesion.
    
    Russia is also developing an authoritarian brand of capitalism with big corporations tied to government in one way or another.
    
    In the US, of course, government is often tied to the corperations which is why it is less democratic than many other advanced nations.

    replyreport
    1. 63

       Mishaposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       Actually reading without thinking does not do any good

       replyreport
    2. 59

       Petra Vlahposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       I very much agree with everything you said

       replyreport
    3. 63

       mintinfoposted 14 years agoin reply to this

       I am well aware of world politics. The question was a philosophical one so I gave a philosophical answer based on future projections. China is still officially a communist country. They have ventured into the capitalist realm while maintaining a socialist base. Other countries maybe in awe at the level of stability but it has to do more with the culture than the economics. If the communist rulers can hold it together it will be hard to emulate.

       replyreport
12. 60

    jodhicoadyposted 14 years ago

    what is even more incredibly frustrating is observing leadership that is multiple:  capitalist, bipartisan, communist, socialist, layered between federal/state/regional and local systems, hello nightmare - welcome to australia

    replyreport
13. 62

    mikelongposted 14 years ago

    Wrong idea Misha.....

    replyreport