Israel/Iran

1. 61

   qwarkposted 14 years ago

   Will Israel,preemptively strike Iran?
   How would the consequences effect all of us?

   replyreport
   1. 80

      skyfireposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Wastage of resources will effect the most. After that watch the prices of gold, oil(any other fuel).

      replyreport
   2. 55

      Sab Ohposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      "Will Israel,preemptively strike Iran?"
      
      I hope so.

      replyreport
2. 70

   Cagsilposted 14 years ago

   In theory, it could start World War III. It would depend on "how" Israel decides to attack Iran.

   replyreport
3. 60

   tobey100posted 14 years ago

   They need to go ahead and take out Iraq as well.  One nuke to turn the whole place into a big hole, fill it with water and tada, Lake Iragan.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      Home Girlposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      It's not a joke, it's very serious matter! It might affect all of us.

      replyreport
      1. 70

         Cagsilposted 14 years agoin reply to this

         Might?
         
         It will effect/affect every human being on the planet.

         replyreport
   2. 55

      Sab Ohposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      "They need to go ahead and take out Iraq as well. "
      
      That makes no sense.

      replyreport
4. 73

   cheaptrickposted 14 years ago

   Israel and Iran don't matter as much as Where each countries Leash leads.The Super Powers that Own them are the ones to Watch!

   replyreport
5. 60

   tobey100posted 14 years ago

   Well, I'm ready for another World War.  It's about time to thin the herd again.  Iran's a good a place to start as any.  Besides, Obama says they don't have nukes so what's everybody worried about?  Don't you trust the President?

   replyreport
   1. 73

      cheaptrickposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Don't Need a War to thin out Population!
      See NWO!
      There Already Doing It!

      replyreport
   2. 70

      Cagsilposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      I don't trust where the President gets his information, because there have been too many times where the information given to the President can be manipulated, so as to leave him plausible deny ability.

      replyreport
6. 0

   Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago

   - striking indeed. How so many look to this itty bitty piece of land and its people as the key holders of the entire planets safety. And rightly so.
   
   
   Is`rael will not 'preemptively' strike Iran nor Iraq.
   Both of these countries are too self involved right now, even vulnerable. Could they, certainly; should they, possibly; will they, not likely.
   
   All the more reason perhaps for the 'powers that be' will attempt to persuade Isra`el to do so. But it would take a lot of persuading. A lot ! something catastrophic.
   
   and, with all due respect, the primary target most likely would be Syria/Lebanon, not Iran/Iraq.

   replyreport
   1. 60

      tobey100posted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Hey, the target don't matter that much to me.  Take 'em all.  By the way, as a side note, I've lived in Lebanon and Egypt.  If you don't think the mid-east folks would love to kill each other your kidding yourself.  Their desire to destroy will overrule their 'self interest' every single time.  If you think Irsael won't strike at Iran you're in for a surprise.  Who's gonna stop them, Obama.  After all the aspersion our own little socialist has cast on Israel he better stay home or at least in Europe.  They love socialist.

      replyreport
   2. 55

      Sab Ohposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      "Is`rael will not 'preemptively' strike Iran nor Iraq"
      
      It is no stretch to imagine they would strike Iran. Striking Iraq now wouldn't make any sense.
      
      
      " with all due respect, the primary target most likely would be Syria/Lebanon"
      
      I don't think so.

      replyreport
      1. 60

         tobey100posted 14 years agoin reply to this

         I actually agree with you.  I've no doubt they'd strike at Iran if they felt threatened enough.  I don't seriously believe they go for Iraq or even Syria.  I just lumped them all together cause they're such a pain in the international butt.

         replyreport
7. 0

   Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago

   ps, don't forget that 'Palestinians' are also the sons of isra`el.
   the world should be watchful when the invisible lines are removed and they unite as a people once more.
   
   in truth there are no 'Palestinians' unless of course we are still in 132 A.D. and Rome is still executing Hebrews entering Jeru`salem.
   
   pss, all this worry about Palestine from the preachers is a crock.
   sorry Armageddon cultists, ain't happening. The land called Palestine is in fact Isra`el, all of them. 
   
   {it is a real estate issue }.
   
   Same as you are not Christians unless you follow roman courtship and pagan titles.
   
   

   replyreport
8. 73

   cheaptrickposted 14 years ago

   I'm tell-in ya,one's gonna take a swipe at the other and Then there Masters are gonna get Involved,and They have Lot's a Nukes if not Worse!

   replyreport
   1. 80

      skyfireposted 14 years agoin reply to this

      Nah, it's better if big-boys don't get involved. There's already economy issues all around the world why waste resources on these two ? Let them finish each other first, then if anything remains can be sorted out by big-boys talks/guns.

      replyreport
9. 0

   Twenty One Daysposted 14 years ago

   the Babylonians were very good with the Hebrews (Iran/Iraq)
   -their philosophy was simple: don't mess w/ each other.
   
   the Philistines ruthless enemies (Syria/Lebanon)
   -kill every single one.
   
   the Arabs, descendants of Ishmael -mixed with Egyptian aka Canaanites- is where the issue lies. Arabia, not Persia.
   
   { love history }

   replyreport