jump to last post 1-8 of 8 discussions (9 posts)

Which is more potentially dangerous for your child, a pop tart gun or dodge ball

  1. bethperry profile image92
    bethperryposted 4 years ago

    Which is more potentially dangerous for your child, a pop tart gun or dodge ball?

    I read a news article awhile back about an elementary school kid being suspended from school for biting his pop tart into the shape of a pistol. Yet dodge ball -with its infamous tendency to shatter eye glasses and cause bruising and skin burns- is still part of the gym curriculum in many schools. So which do you feel holds the greater potential for real danger to your child - a pop tart bitten into the shape of a pistol or an aggressive game of dodge ball?

  2. Alecia Murphy profile image80
    Alecia Murphyposted 4 years ago

    I didn't hear about that pop tart incident but I really think it's an overreaction. Yes school violence is real but if you think a pop tart can hurt a kid, you're sadly mistaken. Schools are so politically correct about some things they omit common sense.
    As for dodgeball, I speak as the kid who was pummeled above the waist several times in middle school. In all honesty, it should be removed from schools or at least separate the games by gender. The worst hits I got were from boys who threw too hard. And to be honest, I never understood what the game did except for give our gym teachers a day to not actually do anything.

  3. phildazz profile image75
    phildazzposted 4 years ago

    A dodge ball can be a dangerous thing but a pop tart is not a danger to anyone whether it's in the shape of a pistol or an elephant. Hope that helps!

  4. Cantuhearmescream profile image81
    Cantuhearmescreamposted 4 years ago

    Yes, I heard of this Pop-Tart incident and as far as I'm concerned, the only damage a Pop-Tart gun can do, is create crumbs! Dodge ball! Boy, what a silly concept. Sure, it's a game I'm sure we've all played and I'm up for any kind of childhood playtime, especially those which encourage and promote physical activity. Yet, I remember being a girl among several boys, wanting to play what other were playing, but shaking like a leaf in fear of actually getting hit with the dodge ball. Do you know how many kids I knew, growing up that lost teeth from this? Geesh!

    1. bethperry profile image92
      bethperryposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      I know what you mean, Cantuhearmescream. When I was in ninth grade a boisterous boy hit me in the ear with the ball, so hard I was deaf for over a day in that ear. I think teachers that encourage the game are either have a mean streak or indifferent.

  5. lburmaster profile image83
    lburmasterposted 4 years ago

    They still have dodge ball in schools? I thought it was gone for good. I'm impressed. But as for the pop tart, that is just foolish of the school. The child is just playing with their food. Cops and robbers has always been a childhood game.

  6. Grace-Wolf-30 profile image60
    Grace-Wolf-30posted 4 years ago

    Oh my word I think we make too much fuss about children playing with toy guns. We all have a natural aggression in us and boys particularly need to play that aggression out. It does not mean that they're going to grow up to be mass murderers. That natural aggression is going to come out some time or another and it is better to set it free in children and let them express whilst they're young enough to learn right from wrong than repress it and it come out dangerously later.

  7. connorj profile image75
    connorjposted 4 years ago


    As a 5 year old boy who had played with a toy bazooka; I caution all to pay close attention to my answer. The answer is quite simply, the pop tart gun. Can you imagine the post traumatic stress that could develop from this? although I seldom eat pop tarts; I certainly will not avoid them. I have no aversion to them; however, if indeed I was exposed to a situation with a pop tart in the shape of a gun; I could only imagine the aversion and trauma that would have developed. If I had indeed eaten less pop tarts my pant size would be less than 38. My back checking in hockey would have been more superior; therefore, Scotty Bowman would have never communicated with me by yelling; BACK CHECK! BACK CHECK! He would have simply ignored me. As a child who played with toy guns and more devastating toy-weapons please, please don't allow your children to play with their food; "let them eat cakes" and play ice hockey...

  8. profile image61
    pronatali2003posted 4 months ago

    The most important part of our immune system is the tonsils. Removing them does not have a very good effect on the body as a whole.
    Experts say that tonsils are important for the body. Even a bad tonsil produces more immunoglobulin than the rest of the immune system.
    Modern doctors recommend removing tonsils only in a few cases. If a person develops an angina more than four times a year, and the disease runs with a high temperature. Development of purulent abscesses against this background. When there is unconscious closure of the airways with large tonsils. Sharp weakening of immunity. In our time, the removal of tonsils is done with sparing methods and with the use of modern equipment. Inflamed foci are affected by ultra-low or super high temperatures. After the death of the damaged tonsil or part of it, its direct removal takes place. Such an operation is absolutely painless. But the tonsils are only partially removed, so during the postoperative period the patient suffers from a sore throat and a slight increase in temperature for some time. Electro coagulation. Damaged and destroyed tonsils are affected by high-frequency electric current. The operation is painless and bloodless. But the use of electric current can adversely affect the surrounding damaged tonsil healthy tissues. There may be some complications after the operation. Ultrasound excision. Cutting of tissues to remove tonsils is made by high-frequency sound vibrations. This operation is good because neither blood vessels nor nearby tissues are damaged. The decision on the operation is taken only as a last resort, when other types of treatment do not help. In this case, the harm and danger of chronic tonsillitis outweigh complications after surgery.
    Removing your adenoids is the most extreme measure. If a person suffering from chronic tonsillitis has problems with internal organs, then undoubtedly surgery is necessary to remove tonsils. Tonsillectomy is performed only when the palatine tonsils begin to work against their own organism.
    In any case, in modern pharmacology there are strong antibiotics.
    We have at our disposal numerous folk remedies, homeopathy. Our health and the well-being of the body largely depends on its integrity.
    To delete or not tonsils? First of all, try to treat them. Quench your own organism, take in the off-season vitamin complexes. Any operation is a serious change in the body and it is better to do without surgical measures. By the way, tonsillectomy in adult peopl