A couple of simple examples first:
http://www.instructables.com/id/Simple- … y-Shelves/
The indestructibles style is 'I, me mine'. Wikihow is 'you, yours'.
WIkihow focuses on the info which makes for brevity and lucidity.
What is indestructibles about?
I would guess the first person is about trying to put people at ease, engage interest at a human level and establish trust. The guy say he has done this, he has pictures, and still seems to be alive after the ordeal, so one (lol) should trust him.
What works best in terms of subject area/target audience?
My teachers always told me to write in third person whenever possible, especially if the focus of the article is objective and informational.
But if I write an article about a subject in which I am not an expert, such as surgery for a detached retina, I think it is better for me to write it in first person because so many other articles on the subject have been written by medical experts. In that case, a first person article reaches a different audience.
So it depends.
With health issues, it is probably best to go for personal accounts of recovery. Having said that, my only health hub is written in an impersonal style. I grilled an orthopedic nurse from the US on hospital procedures and recovery problems and just wrote it up without personalization. It would have taken up too much time to explain where I got the info and she had no desire to be named.
Also, I notice in the intial post I was wrong about first and third person. I probably shouldn't be allowed out on my own, at present.
I had it in my mind that wikihow used the passive voice and 'it' rather than anything personal and went wrong from there.
Third person is 'it' not 'you'. 'You' is second person.
We need some English teachers here.
It's recommended when writing informative articles to use conversational style and that would be using second person.
Example: "You can get best result for your skin using lemon juice to clear acne."
To increase the conversation-ability of the article, add a few instances of first person. "I found that lemon juice worked best when applied in the mornings."
Readers want to know that you have first knowledge of what you are presenting, but they don't want to feel that you are talking about yourself all the time. Drawing the reader in is the most important thing.
At one time, sites were recommending to use third person and avoid first person.
I believe that advice was an over-reaction to the flood of "purely personal" posts that were appearing on such sites. Obviously, pieces about your personal life have no place on a site like HP unless your experience offers valuable insight to others - but to say that you have to avoid first person altogether is just plain silly.
As you say, pieces in first or second person sound warmer and more personal and can engage the reader better IMO.
Personally I don't like first person stuff much. Mostly it is patronizing and just takes up space.
Given that HP is not a high authority site, it has a place in establishing some trust
-- you can set out some credentials. Problem there is that some people will lie.
I reckon an impersonal style can convey authority if the text addresses the issues that concern the reader, succinctly.
I throw in a personal touch mostly if I think kids will be reading. The target for my science stuff is the sixteen year old me, for example.
I almost always write in first person, because I am usually writing about something I have experienced or done. I like a more conversational style.
Sometimes I write in third person, if I am writing about something I have researched and gathered information about. Then I'm not part of the story, so I am writing more objectively and factually, like a magazine article.
I rarely write in second person.
I suppose it entirely depends upon in which your more fluent? and the subject matter
I've always tended to write in the same way as I write on my blog - in the first person when it is about my views and my experiences.
If I'm reporting facts about something I might well use the third person - however I might also top and tail it with a first person comment which gets engagement from others
Given the blurb HP wants on each hub touting our experience and knowledge, are they suggesting first person?
I like to write in first person, but after reading "The Living Art of Writing" I realized the word I came up much too often in all previously written pages.
So the next thing to do was go through most of my pages and reduce the word "I" by rewording and eliminating more than half of the word appearing in each page. If you are using first person be sure to not to use it over extraneously.
by healthmom 5 years ago
I've seen both, writing your profile bio in first and second person. First person: more friendly and accessible. Second person: more mysterious and accomplished. I'm debating. What do you all think?(Or doesn't matter, be worried about things like North Korea nukes, and...
by 3 Finger Reader 4 years ago
I want to ask all of you folks in the forum--how do you feel about writing in the first person in your hubs? Do you think it's unprofessional? I have been debating about this for some time. I feel a great deal of internal pressure to write more "professional" hubs, since...
by Becki Rizzuti 4 years ago
For the past year or so, I've been paying very close attention to this subject. Squidoo pushed its lensmasters for a long time into providing personal content full of first-person perspective and personal pronouns. This has been a problem for me, personally, because I prefer to write in the second...
by Audrey Selig 6 years ago
Should a writer use only third person in an article, or second person if article is informal?Sometimes, is it acceptable to switch from second to third following introduction?
by Chitrangada Sharan 15 months ago
Isn’t it proper to use first and second person in content writing?For example, when I write an introductory paragraph and give some real life examples or experiences to build up the content that follows. I think it’s easier for the readers to relate to it. Recently I used some online...
by naturesencore 8 years ago
Why are subjective accounts (first-person) frowned upon in the writing world? How does one articulate a personal event in the (preferable) third-person context, without losing its intrinsic qualities?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|