Should students be forced to read the same books that were taught 20 years ago?
Even though it wasn't that long ago I remember in high school being forced to read very old and outdated books. Books that were extremely difficult to relate to. My mother is a teacher and the curriculum demands that the same books I read 15 years ago are still being taught today. Should students still have to read the same books like Lord of the Flies and Catcher in the Rye or can more modern books replace them?
Catcher in the Rye? No, because it is boring and dumb. Lord of the Flies? Yes, it is a great book. Kids should not be asked to read mediocre books, but great books yes, no matter how old they are. It isn't the age, it is the quality that counts. Try reading The Wind In The Willows. Plenty old, but really great. My kids loved it.
Not every book is right for everyone. If you didn't like Lord of the Flies, fine. But teachers should challenge kids to read good books instead of just whatever happens to be currently popular.
"Forced" is some heavy word in education. I would rather persuade. Anyway, I am not fond of novels or short stories although I have in my shelves Joseph Conrad's "Lord Jim." I read Hemingway's "The Old Man and the Sea." I was told fiction reflects the author's perception of his milieu. I remember that the Liliputans are not real people and the novel is a parable. Books may remind us or tell us of other times. Modern authors have different perspectives even if they strive hard to be different just to be different. I read "Lady Chatterley's Lover" and the "Plumed Serpent" of D.H. Lawrence because my professor told us he is one of the greatest authors of the twentieth century. I was trying to plumb what Lawrence meant by "blood" until I came to read what mysticism means. I also read that Bertrand Russell once associated with D.H. Lawrence which I think is an unlikely tandem as Russell is logical and Lawrence is mystical. Then I read that Russel parted ways with D.H. I would wonder if he did not.
If there are books that should be read even some 20 years had passed, "Wisdom of the West" is one because it tells of people's thoughts from ancient times, and Russell said that he was writing it through his bias. At least i know that I should guard against his bias assuming I had the equipment. Another book is "What Is Science?" by Norman Campbell who wrote it in 1921. It may not give a complete answer to his question but it gives a glimpse of his shortcomings now that we have advanced in science.
I would like to have a copy of Johannes Kepler's fiction of celestial bodies to compare it with Isaac Asimov's fiction, or to J. Klugger's "Apollo 13." It is lamentable that a lot of trees had been wasted to print books of spycraft and sex or Starr's report on the escapades of a president, which is a testimony to the efficiency of the printing press.. At least these trees could have served to mitigate climate change.
There are some classics that teach timeless lessons, but these books should definitely be integrated with more contemporary ones. Think how poorly generations would relate to each other if we didn't have some commonalities in our educations.
I agree that there are certain books that are timeless. Personally I enjoyed reading To Kill a Mockingbird, The Outsiders and Joy Luck Club in School. I also think that I could have survived my education without ever reading books like The Pearl and Of Mice and Men. I don't necessarily think all the books that have been taught over the years should be cast aside, just perhaps some selections could be updated a bit.
If one were to follow your question to its "logical" conclusion, I guess we would discontinue reading Shakespeare, or "Moby Dick" or any of the other "classics"...
What the heck... why don't we get a re-write on your algebra I text while we're at it????
Some books... some topics.... some style, syntax, thoughts, feelings, emotions are TIMELESS.... and the age/form of the book - the writing - are of little or no importance......
P.S. If it weren't for "Cliff Notes" (my favorite form of "literature") I never would have made it through high school... never mind college!!!!!
The book selection in English classes needs a major upgrade. The Scarlet Letter is the most painful reading experience I've ever had. People may say that young people need to read these books to relate to older generations, but I think that fostering a young person's love for reading is more important. When you force these poor kids to read A Scarlet Letter, you're sapping any desire to read right out of them.
I wrote a whole Hub about it, if anyone feels elaboration on that answer is needed:
http://stegtodiffer.hubpages.com/hub/Th … igh-School
No. With the vast number of books available today and more coming out each year, it would be beneficial to read some of the newer authors. A comparison of two books, one from an older author such as H.G. Wells and one from a newer author could lead to discussions on why each fit the category of Classical or Fantastic, etc. Comparison of the two would also allow for changes in environment due to the technologies of today, real-life experiences in different time periods as reflected in the writing of the novels. In this way the students could glean more meaning from the older classics and learn to appreciate life on a different level of understanding.
by Ken R. Abell 7 years ago
Is there one novel you've read more than once? What keeps bringing you back to it?
by Motown2Chitown 7 years ago
Most of us are avid readers, I'd assume. I'd like to give some time to what novels and books have affected you dramatically in some way - such as prompting you to change your life or just opening your mind to a new understanding of certain things. Do you read them again and again and...
by seicheprey 7 years ago
What's your favorite 'classic' which you were forced to read in high school?Classic is a loose term, especially when applied to what is considered today's canon of American Literature. So, basically, just looking at the books you were required to read in high school, which one was your...
by letterme 5 years ago
What do you prefer ? Reading many books from the same author or many books from different authors?We often find many similarities, patterns, ideas recurring in many fictional works by the same author.Do you find it boring or tiresome? In the case of reading books from different authors we...
by telltale 6 months ago
Do people nowadays prefer to read in the Internet rather than actual books?Do people read books at all nowadays? I noticed that not many people prefer to go to the library for books, what do you think?
by Vishaaa 6 years ago
Reading books as a hobby, does it still exist?I see the empty book shops. Libraries have become a place where people can sleep peacefully.When I talk about books with friends they are clueless.Some say they don't have time to do. Some say it is for people who are jobless. I'm just wondering whether...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|