ArtsAutosBooksBusinessEducationEntertainmentFamilyFashionFoodGamesGenderHealthHolidaysHomeHubPagesPersonal FinancePetsPoliticsReligionSportsTechnologyTravel

What is the safest investment option to multiply your wealth?

Updated on August 5, 2008

We all want to increase our investments while minimizing our risk. With these two goals at odds with each other, the course of action which is right for you will depend on your risk tolerance and investment time frame. Let's look at a few of the safer investment strategies and compare their pros and cons.

Savings Account

Well, technically this is an investment because banks do pay interest on savings and most checking accounts. But unless you have a significant amount of cash in your account, you might not even see any growth other than a few cents each quarter. For instance, the Annual Percentage Yield (APY) on a regular savings account at Bank of America at the time of this writing was a measly 0.2%! It's fairly easy to do better than this without significantly increasing your risk.

Electronic Banks

Why do brick & mortar banks offer such a low APY? Well, certainly a reasonable explanation is that the banks themselves have a number of costs. The buildings have construction costs, or leases if they don't own, electricity bills, and the employees like managers and tellers don't work for free of course. Nowadays there exist a number of banks which don't have or have a very minimal physical presense. These banks conduct virtually all of their business online. Two examples you might have heard of are ING and HSBC. Individuals can open accounts online and link the account to their physical bank so that they can go online or use the telephone and initiate deposits or withdrawals between their e-bank and their account at their physical bank. Because these e-banks have no building costs and much less personnel costs, they are able to offer better APYs to their clients. Currently ING is offering 3.0% and HSBC is offering 3.5%.

One more thing should be said about the two preceding options: in the US these accounts are FDIC insured for all account balances up to $100,000. That means that even if the banks went out of business and lost all their money, the US Government would make sure the clients got their money up to the $100,000 limit. Now, the remaining options I mention are different in that they are not FDIC insured, meaning it is possible that you could lose some or all of your investment. Don't let that scare you though, I'm still discussing investment vehicles that in real practice are not highly risky.


Bonds are where you give your money to a company essentially saying "I'm letting you use this money for a time and you are committing to return it to me at a later date with interest." This is different from stocks, which are like you saying to the company "I'm buying interest in your company because I think your company, and hence my piece, will grow and become more valuable." Bonds are debt- the company owes you back your money plus interest. Stocks are equity- you've bought into the company. If things turn sour and the company falls apart, it is obligated to pay back its debt before it buys back any shares of stock from investors who want to get out. Remember again, neither bonds nor stock have that FDIC insurance.

Bonds themselves come in different types and have varying grades of risk and return. Arguably the safest bonds are those issued by the government of a stable country. US savings bonds can be bought at half of face value and the government promises that they can be redeemed for at least full face value after 20 years. For example, if you bought a $100 US savings bond on January 1, 2000, you would have paid $50 and on January 1, 2020, you could go to a bank and get $100 in cash for it. If you hold on to that savings bond for longer, it can increase further in value, but after 30 years from the time of purchase the savings bond's growth is capped.

Besides government bonds you can also buy bonds issued by companies. There are so many types of bonds, each with different rules and growth mechanisms, the simple description is that you buy a bond at a given issue price, and by the maturity date, specified at the time of purchase, the issuer (the company) pays you the nominal amount and interest earned. With respect to maturity date, the three general cagtegories of bonds are:

  • Short Term (matures in up to one year)
  • Medium Term (matures in one to ten years)
  • Long Term (matures in over ten years)

These are some of the investment options that don't tread very far into the risk direction. As one looks up the ladder at the investment options with higher risk (and higher potential returns) one would see the mutual funds. In a mutual fund, lots of small investors pool their money together and a professional money manager invests the funds in (ideally) a diversified portfolio of stocks. This way, the risk is spread out so that if one or a small number of the companies in which the manager has invested the funds fails, the value of the fund will not suffer significantly. The expectation (perhaps hope) of this strategy is that the probability that all the companies in which the fund is invested will fail is very small.

And of course the least safe method of investment is investing in an individual company's stocks. If the company does very well, so does the individual. But, it only takes some bad news or a bad earnings report of one company and your investment's value could drop very quickly.

Good Luck!


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Greenheart profile image

      Greenheart 7 years ago from Cambridge


      What about silver as a form of investment?.

      Listening to Robert Kiyosaki and his financial advisor,Mike Maloney and others,they are bullish on this precious metal.Mike thinks that $100 an ounce is "an absolute no brainer" at some point.And it could go much higher.There are a variety of reasons given for silver increasing in value.One is that silver is used in many industrial products around the world and yet there isn't that much of it left.

      Thanks for listening!


    • Neil Ashworth profile image

      George Poe 7 years ago from United Kingdom

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts and knowledge on this topic...

    • Timothy C. Schewe profile image

      Timothy C. Schewe 9 years ago from

      Pete, I respectfully disagree.The primary purpose of investing is to counteract the effects of inflation, otherwise a can in the back yard would suffice. It seems all of your "safe" vehicles under perform in relation to inflation. Is that "safe"?

      During the Clinton administration the manner in which the CPI is calculated was changed resulting in a consistant under-estimation of inflation. One of the reasons this change was implimented was to avoid having to increase Social Security benefits which today are about 45% of what they would be absent the change. But I digress, were the CPI computed using the old method inflation would "officially" be about three times greater than the rate currently reported. Most recognise that current inflation is running far higher than the "officially" reported figures.

      As a result "safe" intrest bearing "investments" like CD's, Money Market accounts, Bonds (what about defaults or early calls?) are in fact anything but as purchasing power is constantly eroded. (Lost as in losses as in not safe)

      I will posit that the only "safe" investment is that which consistantly produces above average gains and these are to be found (with but the rarest of exceptions) in individual stocks. Of course learning how to pick stocks requires some modest mental exertion, but the pay-off is usually far in excess of the effort put in.

      The "conventional wisdom" has it that investing directly in individual stocks is far too complex and dangerous an activity for the average person. My experience coaching and mentoring individual investors for the past 14 years proves unequivocally that this is not the case. In fact if one has the acumen necessary to accumulate savings to invest, that person has all the acumen necessary to learn how to invest safely and very profitably in the stock market on their own.

    • lex123 profile image

      lex123 9 years ago

      I feel that investing on a land is the best option.

    • group buy profile image

      group buy 9 years ago from Seattle

      For me, I like real estates and stocks. Especially in real estate, you have the control what you are selling, stocks don't.

    • Pete Michner profile image

      Pete Michner 9 years ago from Virginia

      Thanks for reading Pam! About a year ago the rate for my ING account was as high as 4.2%, when everybody was doing better. So you see it moves around but pretty much always is better than the brick and mortars.

    • Pam Pounds profile image

      Pam Pounds 9 years ago from So Cal Girl in the Midwest!

      Hi Pete! Great got me thinking about moving my cash from a brick and mortar to ING. Didn't know they had such a better APY!

    • Pete Michner profile image

      Pete Michner 9 years ago from Virginia

      Hi! This hub was about safer investments and mutual funds and individual stocks have a bit more risk, but I think I'll write another hub describing mutual funds and stocks in more detail. Thanks for stopping by and reading!

    • Trsmd profile image

      Trsmd 9 years ago from India

      what about Mutual Fund and Stock market?